Mad Rocket Scientist Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 (edited) 15 (-1) EDIT: Invalid Edited March 10, 2019 by Mad Rocket Scientist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barzon Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 16(-1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 Just now, Aperture Science said: Barzon, literally no change 19 (+) Just now, Dman979 said: 16 (-1) Aperture Science had the last valid post. 18(-1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Rocket Scientist Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 17 (-1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barzon Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 (edited) 16(-1) Edited March 10, 2019 by Barzon Kerman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 (edited) 18 (+1) Just now, Mad Rocket Scientist said: 17 (-1) Just now, Barzon Kerman said: 17(-1) barzon no Edited March 10, 2019 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 Jeez, it sure would be a shame if someone was keeping track of the errors and saving them to use when some team was close to winning.... 18 (-1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barzon Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 I'm sorry... 17(-1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Rocket Scientist Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 (Non game post: @Aperture Science are posts with edited numbers valid?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Mad Rocket Scientist said: (Non game post: @Aperture Science are posts with edited numbers valid?) You're not to edit after someone else has posted in front of you. If the number was edited after the next post, discard it. 9 minutes ago, Dman979 said: Jeez, it sure would be a shame if someone was keeping track of the errors and saving them to use when some team was close to winning.... 18 (-1) I'm currently on mobile, so I'll go over all of those when I get access to a computer. Might also make a rule that prevents that by adding a max time to report the error. Edited March 10, 2019 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkOwl57 Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 16 (-1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 1 minute ago, DarkOwl57 said: 16 (-1) 17(+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkOwl57 Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 16 - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Rocket Scientist Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 My analysis of the situation is in the spoiler. Spoiler 24 minutes ago, Aperture Science said: Barzon, literally no change 19 (+) This post was valid. 23 minutes ago, Dman979 said: 18 (-1) As was this one. 23 minutes ago, Barzon Kerman said: 17(-1) This post was 18 (-1), but it was edited before... 22 minutes ago, Aperture Science said: DISREGARD POST, EDITED BEFORE I POSTED ...this was posted. Thus, Barzon's 17 was valid. 22 minutes ago, Dman979 said: 16 (-1) This should be valid, since the last post was Barzon's 17, which was edited but valid. 21 minutes ago, Aperture Science said: 17 (+) Ditto. 21 minutes ago, Mad Rocket Scientist said: 15 (-1) EDIT: Invalid This post is invalid, since it missed Aperture's 17, and was edited to reflect that. 20 minutes ago, Barzon Kerman said: 16(-1) This post does not point out my invalid post, but may still be valid, since it is replying to Aperture's 17. 20 minutes ago, Dman979 said: Aperture Science had the last valid post. 18(-1) I don't think this revert was valid, since the quoted incorrect post (Dman's 17) was in reply to Barzon's post which was edited to 17. Since Barzon's 17 was edited before the next posts, Dman's 17 was valid, even if it was replying to an edited comment. Everything below this would be invalidated by this revert being wrong. 19 minutes ago, Mad Rocket Scientist said: 17 (-1) Assuming the revert was correct, this is valid. 19 minutes ago, Barzon Kerman said: 16(-1) This post was edited to 16 from 17 after Aperture's 18, which invalidates it. 18 minutes ago, Aperture Science said: 18 (+1) barzon no This post reverted to my 17, quoting Barzon as 17, and continuing from from my 17. 17 minutes ago, Dman979 said: Jeez, it sure would be a shame if someone was keeping track of the errors and saving them to use when some team was close to winning.... 18 (-1) This post is invalid, since it reverts to the last time the number was 19 (Aperture, at the very top of this post) without quoting the last correct and the incorrect posts. 15 minutes ago, Barzon Kerman said: I'm sorry... 17(-1) This post would be valid unless it is invalidated by one of the errors above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barzon Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 So what number are we at? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Rocket Scientist Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 1 minute ago, Barzon Kerman said: So what number are we at? No idea. I'm going to wait for a GM to give us some clarification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 1 hour ago, Dman979 said: [quotes] Aperture Science had the last valid post. 18(-1) Invalid correction. The quote was ninja'd by the edit that discarded the move, making Barzon's the last valid post. 1 hour ago, Barzon Kerman said: 16(-1) 17 (+1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barzon Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 16(-1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lapis Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 (edited) edit: i was looking at the wrong page Edited March 10, 2019 by lapis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barzon Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 THE RULES HAVE BEEN UPDATED (REGARDING PLAYERS, RULE 5) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Invalid post: 6 minutes ago, lapis said: 55(+1) Last valid: 12 minutes ago, Barzon Kerman said: 16(-1) 17 (+1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lapis Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 18 (+1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barzon Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 17 (-1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerbolExplorer Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 18(+1) MAYDAY MAYDAY WE ARE GOING DOWN! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barzon Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 17(-1) @Gargamel and @Dman979 I need your help! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts