Jump to content

How do you launch to synchronous orbit with more than 1 launch.


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Athen said:

but I cant launch more that 1 satellite at a time.

 

How come? Have you unlocked fairings yet? There are a few methods to launch multiple satellites on the same ship and an interesting ballet to be performed which allows you to drop them off one by one at their intended positions. Most of those methods involve the fairing parts, and the truss structure and internal nodes to stack repeats of the same satellite on the same rocket. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or, you could launch the 2nd and 3rd satellites into slightly lower orbits than keostationary, wait until each drifts into the correct position, and then circularize.

Edited by FloppyRocket
typos are my friend
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While setup for remotetech, this also works for stock... and for moar than just comm sats... basically anything you want in a constellation

https://ryohpops.github.io/kspRemoteTechPlanner/

 

Basically, with multple sats on one launch, you need to setup a resonant orbit for the delivery vehicle.
That site displays exact parameters for for both Single & Multiple Launch missions. (kind of a misnomer, as Single/Multiple means for the payload vehicle...*not* for the sats/payloads themselves)

Edited by Stone Blue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, klesh said:

 

How come? Have you unlocked fairings yet? There are a few methods to launch multiple satellites on the same ship and an interesting ballet to be performed which allows you to drop them off one by one at their intended positions. Most of those methods involve the fairing parts, and the truss structure and internal nodes to stack repeats of the same satellite on the same rocket. 

My satellites i want to launch are a little too big for the nodes. At most i could launch 2 at a time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Athen said:

My satellites i want to launch are a little too big for the nodes. At most i could launch 2 at a time.

Place a second fairing on the last node of the first fairing.  Place two sats between the fairing bases and the last on on top of the second fairing.  Build a fairing around all three sats from the lower base and leave the upper base without a fairing built on it.  Or create an interstage between the two bases and cap the top one with a pointy fairing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Launch sat 1, put it in the orbit you want.
  • Launch sat 2, put it in an elliptical orbit with Ap at the orbit of Sat 1. Then set up the first step of a rendezvous so on the next orbit, the 2 satellites are near each other.
  • When they are actually near each other, burn with Sat 2 so that its orbit is 1/3 or 2/3 the period of Sat 1. 2/3 is easier. 1/3 may not even be possible.
  • Next orbit, it will be in the proper place at Ap, so burn it into an orbit that matches Sat 1's in period.
  • Repeat for Sat 3, but use Sat 2 as your reference point.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, bewing said:

Launch the sats exactly 2 hours apart, and perform precisely the same ascent each time. Then adjust the orbits to get them to have the correct periods.

That won't work for geosynchronous orbits. Spacing by a fraction of Kerbin's sidereal day works well for spacing longitude of the ascending node, but that's arbitrary for geostationary birds.

What does work is to initially place them into a resonant orbit, and circularize after different numbers of orbits. For example, if you did a 2/3 resonant parking orbit, one would circularize after two orbits, one after one, and one immediately on hitting apoapsis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/2/2019 at 9:51 PM, Starman4308 said:

That won't work for geosynchronous orbits. Spacing by a fraction of Kerbin's sidereal day works well for spacing longitude of the ascending node, but that's arbitrary for geostationary birds…

Why not? You’ll end up with three sats on the same orbit, spaced by 2 hours out of 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, pincushionman said:

Why not? You’ll end up with three sats on the same orbit, spaced by 2 hours out of 6.

Think about it. Imagine you could launch it straight up instantaneously to keosynchronous orbit. 2 hours later, launch the next one- the first one is still straight up, since it's in keosynchronous orbit, so the second one ends up in the same spot. Then do it with the 3rd- you end up with 3 satellites in the same spot. Same thing will happen if you use a normal transfer orbit to get it there, it's just harder to visualize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, pincushionman said:

Why not? You’ll end up with three sats on the same orbit, spaced by 2 hours out of 6.

Let's say you try this.

Your launch site has rotated by 120 degrees... but the first satellite has also rotated by 120 degrees. Both will end up looking at the same patch of Kerbin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, GoatRider said:

Think about it. Imagine you could launch it straight up instantaneously to keosynchronous orbit. 2 hours later, launch the next one- the first one is still straight up, since it's in keosynchronous orbit, so the second one ends up in the same spot. Then do it with the 3rd- you end up with 3 satellites in the same spot. Same thing will happen if you use a normal transfer orbit to get it there, it's just harder to visualize.

 

1 hour ago, Starman4308 said:

Let's say you try this.

Your launch site has rotated by 120 degrees... but the first satellite has also rotated by 120 degrees. Both will end up looking at the same patch of Kerbin.

You guys are right! I tip my hat to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd probably launch direct to required AP and a pair of 4-hour orbits for the first sat, direct to AP and a single 4-hour orbit then circularize for 2nd, and direct to AP and circularize for the 3rd.

On second thought, circularizing and changing your AP to that required for stationary/synchronous at a fixed point will probably work better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...