Nertea Posted October 31 Author Share Posted October 31 On 10/30/2024 at 9:31 AM, Professor K said: Some additional troubleshooting: Even after the re-install, the harvester itself is showing all the resources in u/s. The scanners and the map screen info are in u/m3. I set up an atmospheric processor from the base SpaceDust parts and it also listed the resources in u/s, although both the OX and Argon present did harvest as expected. I found this line in the English localization, which looks like it should be the UI line used for the Resource PAW lines. Possibly the mod's code is not reading it and dropping back to an internal default? #LOC_SpaceDust_ModuleSpaceDustHarvester_Field_Scoop_Resource = <b><<1>></b>: <<2>> t/s -K I grabbed the mod off this official release page: https://github.com/post-kerbin-mining-corporation/SpaceDust/releases/tag/0.5.4 to confirm there wasn't a release issue. This is what I see (base game with no discoveries so only shows the two resources): The units shown are only a symptom of the problem, not the problem - note also how different your numbers are - they look like they're from an old version. I'm going to need logs, modlists, etc, but I really suspect you have a older copy of some SpaceDust stuff in your GameData (maybe a second one from another mod that's bundling it badly?). Another thing - you need to tell me where in the game world you're getting those readings from so I can replicate the problem. edit- also another weird thing: you have in that screenshot exospheric distributions of Oxidizer and LF. I don't ship those in this or any of my mods, so something else is going on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nertea Posted October 31 Author Share Posted October 31 Oh, while the forum was down there was a release: Fixed Antimatter Costs Science setting only working in Career and not Science mode Fixed an extra F in the Antimatter Loading window and tweaked the decimals displayed Removed antimatter cost from settings config file in case it confuses people Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor K Posted October 31 Share Posted October 31 3 hours ago, Nertea said: The units shown are only a symptom of the problem, not the problem - note also how different your numbers are - they look like they're from an old version. I'm going to need logs, modlists, etc, but I really suspect you have a older copy of some SpaceDust stuff in your GameData (maybe a second one from another mod that's bundling it badly?). Another thing - you need to tell me where in the game world you're getting those readings from so I can replicate the problem. I think you hit the proverbial Kerbal on the head, or at least partially. A search for SpaceDust in mods other than yours turned up a SpaceDust folder in the Parts folder of "Cacteye 2 Refocused" that included a set of localization files from a 2022 version of SpaceDust. The author appears to have been attempting to integrate the functions of your mod's telescopes into that mod while removing yours from the parts list. No stray DLLs though. Removing the CactEye mod from the sandbox setup seems to have fixed the unit display issue. Unfortunately, removing CactEye would break my ongoing game, so I need to figure out what exactly is happening and try to fix it. At first perusal I think simply removing the localizations from the CactEye spacedust folder will do the trick, there doesn't seem to be anything in them that's not in the latest "real" one. These and the original screenshots are all from orbit around Kerbin with force Discover and Identify turned on in the SpaceDust config. Quote edit- also another weird thing: you have in that screenshot exospheric distributions of Oxidizer and LF. I don't ship those in this or any of my mods, so something else is going on. That was me experimenting with adding ring shaped bands in order to learn how to add them for an additional planet pack I have. I was adding them to Kerbin to make testing easy. I do have an odd issue with that as well, although I was hoping that resolving my original issue would resolve it. It has not. Without my additional bands, specifically the OX one, I see an atmospheric band of OX, as shown in the first image above. With my band in place, the Atmospheric band disappears and I see two identical exospheric bands of OX as shown below. Turning on display of either of the two duplicates shows the same exosphereic band. // Defines Oxidizer definitions for Kerbin exosphere // KERBIN // So many fuel tanks have been vented and otherwise lost around Kerbin that it has low concentrations of gasified oxidizer to collect // ============= SPACEDUST_RESOURCE:NEEDS[SpaceDust] { resourceName = Oxidizer body = Kerbin RESOURCEBAND { name = kerbinOrbit title = #LOC_SpaceDust_Band_Orbit // Discoverability Data // -------------- alwaysDiscovered = true alwaysIdentified = true bandType = Exosphere // Maximum and minimum abundances (variation is by game seed) // In t/m^3 minAbundance = 0.0000000000276 maxAbundance = 0.0000000000306 // Scale abundances by air density useAirDensity = false // Distribution Data // -------------- // Distribution model to use, can be Uniform or Spherical distributionType = Spherical // These parameters are specific to the Spherical model // ------- // Altitudes are in km from sea level // Maximum altitude for a distribution altUpperBound = 650000 // minimum altitude for a distribution altLowerBound = 80000 // peak of a distribution altPeak = 300000 // maximum variation of these altitudes (variation is by game seed) altVariability = 10 // Falloff for altitude, can be Linear or None altFalloffType = Linear // lats in degrees // Maximum latitude for a distribution latUpperBound = 10 // Minimum latitude for a distribution latLowerBound = -10 // peak of a distribution latPeak = 0 // maximum variation of these latitudes (variation is by game seed) latVariability = 1 // Falloff for latitude, can be Linear or None latFalloffType = Linear } } -K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nertea Posted November 14 Author Share Posted November 14 Sorry every time I've remembered about this the forum has been down. So your issue is... solved? Sorry hard to tell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor K Posted November 14 Share Posted November 14 (edited) 21 hours ago, Nertea said: Sorry every time I've remembered about this the forum has been down. So your issue is... solved? Sorry hard to tell. I know the feeling on the forums. As to my issue... Well, the old labeling is gone, but the numbers themselves haven't changed. I'm still seeing concentrations that require game years of harvesting to gather usable quantities of basic resources like LiqHydrogen. I've "solved" it for myself by simply patching the concentrations in the config files with my own MM patches to increase the levels to where they work for me. If you're interested in researching it further, just let me know what data you need and I'll do my best to put it together. -K Oh, I am still having the issue with the ExoSphere OX band somehow overwriting the planetary OX band as well. I haven't found a solution to that. Edited November 15 by Professor K Added info Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nertea Posted November 15 Author Share Posted November 15 23 hours ago, Professor K said: Oh, I am still having the issue with the ExoSphere OX band somehow overwriting the planetary OX band as well. I haven't found a solution to that. Can you attach the config files you're using? 23 hours ago, Professor K said: As to my issue... Well, the old labeling is gone, but the numbers themselves haven't changed. I'm still seeing concentrations that require game years of harvesting to gather usable quantities of basic resources like LiqHydrogen. I've "solved" it for myself by simply patching the concentrations in the config files with my own MM patches to increase the levels to where they work for me. If you're interested in researching it further, just let me know what data you need and I'll do my best to put it together. This is a case where we might have to check expectations. The way I've set it up is that liquid hydrogen is slow to collect because it's literally just free fuel that allows infinite travel. If I let you plop an extractor in Kerbin orbit, it's just a free fuel factory now. That has to be slow... Here's a poorly pasted table of the exospheric bands that are in the default spaceDust distributions, with a what if for how long it takes a single scoop in about the 'middle' of the distribution to collect a gram of product. Resource Name Time for 1g of product, d Antimatter kerbRing 2,012.3405978 Antimatter kerbRingHigher 192.2191496 Antimatter joolExo 17.4879609 Antimatter laytheAreaRing 415.5530293 Antimatter laytheRing 332.4708279 LqdHydrogen kerbinExo 2,207.00 LqdHydrogen SunExo 331.18 LqdHydrogen joolExo 0.1126180 So in this case if you're scooping at kerbin, I expect it to take years to get anything in LH2 land. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephensmat Posted November 15 Share Posted November 15 8 minutes ago, Nertea said: So in this case if you're scooping at kerbin, I expect it to take years to get anything in LH2 land. I've been having trouble with my KSP save, so I started a new Career. FFT is one of the Mods I brought with me. I'm nowhere near Jool, or Antimatter engines yet. That said, Jool feels like the right place for Antimatter and Liquid Hydrogen harvesting. You start with chemical rockets and all. If you can get production into Jool orbit, then you've officially 'mastered' that style of spaceflight, and get to upgrade so that moving around the system is no longer the hard part. Like going from Apollo, to The Martian, to The Expanse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor K Posted November 16 Share Posted November 16 16 hours ago, Nertea said: Can you attach the config files you're using? This is the config file that appears to trigger the issue. Without it I get the stock Kerbin atmospheric OX band, with it I get two identical exospheric OX bands and no atmospheric band. Please ignore the units, the screenshots were taken before fixing the labeling issue. I can't seem to figure out how to attach a file in this forum, so here's the config file in a code block. // Defines Oxidizer definitions for Kerbin exosphere // KERBIN // So many fuel tanks have been vented and otherwise lost around Kerbin that it has low concentrations of gasified oxidizer to collect // ============= SPACEDUST_RESOURCE:NEEDS[SpaceDust] { resourceName = Oxidizer body = Kerbin RESOURCEBAND { name = kerbinOrbit title = #LOC_SpaceDust_Band_Orbit // Discoverability Data // -------------- alwaysDiscovered = true alwaysIdentified = true allowRemoteDiscovery = true allowRemoteIdentification = true bandType = Exosphere // Maximum and minimum abundances (variation is by game seed) // In t/m^3 minAbundance = 0.0000000000276 maxAbundance = 0.0000000000306 // Scale abundances by air density useAirDensity = false // Distribution Data // -------------- // Distribution model to use, can be Uniform or Spherical distributionType = Spherical // These parameters are specific to the Spherical model // ------- // Altitudes are in km from sea level // Maximum altitude for a distribution altUpperBound = 650000 // minimum altitude for a distribution altLowerBound = 80000 // peak of a distribution altPeak = 300000 // maximum variation of these altitudes (variation is by game seed) altVariability = 5 // Falloff for altitude, can be Linear or None altFalloffType = Linear // lats in degrees // Maximum latitude for a distribution latUpperBound = 10 // Minimum latitude for a distribution latLowerBound = -10 // peak of a distribution latPeak = 0 // maximum variation of these latitudes (variation is by game seed) latVariability = 1 // Falloff for latitude, can be Linear or None latFalloffType = Linear } } -K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor K Posted November 16 Share Posted November 16 16 hours ago, Nertea said: This is a case where we might have to check expectations. The way I've set it up is that liquid hydrogen is slow to collect because it's literally just free fuel that allows infinite travel. If I let you plop an extractor in Kerbin orbit, it's just a free fuel factory now. That has to be slow... So in this case if you're scooping at kerbin, I expect it to take years to get anything in LH2 land. That may well be the issue for me then. While I realize it's more realistic and understand why you set it up that way, my personal play style doesn't usually involve the time warping through very long stretchs to have things happen that I see many others use. It's an easy enough thing to patch for myself though now that that I understand how the system works and I thank you for taking the time to look into it for me and explain the system. While I've only started using Spacedust and FFT with this playthrough, I've been using your NFT mods for quite a while and they are some of my favorites. -K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nertea Posted November 17 Author Share Posted November 17 On 11/16/2024 at 7:18 AM, Professor K said: That may well be the issue for me then. While I realize it's more realistic and understand why you set it up that way, my personal play style doesn't usually involve the time warping through very long stretchs to have things happen that I see many others use. It's an easy enough thing to patch for myself though now that that I understand how the system works and I thank you for taking the time to look into it for me and explain the system. While I've only started using Spacedust and FFT with this playthrough, I've been using your NFT mods for quite a while and they are some of my favorites. -K That's not quite what I meant - I don't think players should timewarp for resources much if it all, so the existence of this band at a very low concentration is meant to do a couple things Telegraph that it's something you can do in general "hey I can collect LH2 in orbit"! Indicate via its low useability that there's probably better places to look for it. Provide a close-to-kerbin proving ground where you can test the harvesting, even if it's not very effective. Provide a nice 'treat' for the player if they were to go away and do missions for years, they come back and have some free fuel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KspNoobUsernameTaken Posted November 18 Share Posted November 18 1 hour ago, Nertea said: Telegraph that it's something you can do in general "hey I can collect LH2 in orbit"! Indicate via its low useability that there's probably better places to look for it. Provide a close-to-kerbin proving ground where you can test the harvesting, even if it's not very effective. Provide a nice 'treat' for the player if they were to go away and do missions for years, they come back and have some free fuel This is a very interesting thought process, makes sense. I will note that part two didn't really "click" for me until I read through the config files, I just assumed that harvesting is kind of a gimmick and not useful. Also, I feel like there should be a more descriptive message for when there are collectable resources in the area, but the concentration is lower than the minHarvestValue of your collectors. That caused me a lot of grief before. (Not sure if you changed this in a newer version) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nertea Posted November 20 Author Share Posted November 20 On 11/16/2024 at 7:00 AM, Professor K said: This is the config file that appears to trigger the issue. Without it I get the stock Kerbin atmospheric OX band, with it I get two identical exospheric OX bands and no atmospheric band. Please ignore the units, the screenshots were taken before fixing the labeling issue. I can't seem to figure out how to attach a file in this forum, so here's the config file in a code block. // Defines Oxidizer definitions for Kerbin exosphere // KERBIN // So many fuel tanks have been vented and otherwise lost around Kerbin that it has low concentrations of gasified oxidizer to collect // ============= SPACEDUST_RESOURCE:NEEDS[SpaceDust] { resourceName = Oxidizer body = Kerbin RESOURCEBAND { name = kerbinOrbit title = #LOC_SpaceDust_Band_Orbit // Discoverability Data // -------------- alwaysDiscovered = true alwaysIdentified = true allowRemoteDiscovery = true allowRemoteIdentification = true bandType = Exosphere // Maximum and minimum abundances (variation is by game seed) // In t/m^3 minAbundance = 0.0000000000276 maxAbundance = 0.0000000000306 // Scale abundances by air density useAirDensity = false // Distribution Data // -------------- // Distribution model to use, can be Uniform or Spherical distributionType = Spherical // These parameters are specific to the Spherical model // ------- // Altitudes are in km from sea level // Maximum altitude for a distribution altUpperBound = 650000 // minimum altitude for a distribution altLowerBound = 80000 // peak of a distribution altPeak = 300000 // maximum variation of these altitudes (variation is by game seed) altVariability = 5 // Falloff for altitude, can be Linear or None altFalloffType = Linear // lats in degrees // Maximum latitude for a distribution latUpperBound = 10 // Minimum latitude for a distribution latLowerBound = -10 // peak of a distribution latPeak = 0 // maximum variation of these latitudes (variation is by game seed) latVariability = 1 // Falloff for latitude, can be Linear or None latFalloffType = Linear } } -K It looks like there's a logic bug with specifying multiple SPACEDUST_RESOURCE entries with the same body and resource versus just adding more RESOURCEBAND entries. This can be fixed. edit: this has been fixed and a new release of Space Dust is out with it. I will update the bundled FFT one eventually, I am fixing a couple things in FFT first. On 11/17/2024 at 4:15 PM, KspNoobUsernameTaken said: This is a very interesting thought process, makes sense. I will note that part two didn't really "click" for me until I read through the config files, I just assumed that harvesting is kind of a gimmick and not useful. Also, I feel like there should be a more descriptive message for when there are collectable resources in the area, but the concentration is lower than the minHarvestValue of your collectors. That caused me a lot of grief before. (Not sure if you changed this in a newer version) Yeah newer versions have a more descriptive message (eh, there was one but it was bugged) and also fix the litany of logic bugs that resulted in those appearing at all (the intent was to only really have that cutoff if people wanted to enable it). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor K Posted November 21 Share Posted November 21 23 hours ago, Nertea said: It looks like there's a logic bug with specifying multiple SPACEDUST_RESOURCE entries with the same body and resource versus just adding more RESOURCEBAND entries. This can be fixed. edit: this has been fixed and a new release of Space Dust is out with it. I will update the bundled FFT one eventually, I am fixing a couple things in FFT first. Thanks Nertea! I installed the updated version and can confirm that it fixed the issue for me. -K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroOwl Posted November 27 Share Posted November 27 Hello everyone, Hope it is a good place to ask a question about supplementary mods that should go well with Far Future Techs. I installed FFT for my career because I wanted to have something to aspire to at the end of the tech tree, something to invest all that science and have an "endgame" when you understand that even with 0.5 sci a couple of good/full other planets missions get you through the old tech tree. This is my first more seriously modded playthrough, before it was only TACLS. What I seem to understand, though, is that FFT alone won't fly so well. What else am I recommended to have apart from FFT? I want to still preserve that "here is stock, and here is the future" division, but it looks like I would need Near Future Launch Vehicles and Heat Control to properly use the FFT, right? Do I need something else from the supporting side for the experience to be reasonable? In particular, do I need any additional ISRU mods if I want to set up new fuels production chains. I installed Rational Resources. Maybe I'm looking in the wrong place, but it looks like not everything is covered (e.g. nothing produces Enriched Uranium). Not all fuels/propellants are supposed to be harvestable? My current GameData. Thank you! And thank you Nertea for your amazing work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dressian Exploder Posted November 27 Share Posted November 27 If you don't have Rational Resources Parts as well as the actual plugin, that might be a good place to look. SpaceDust should also allow for harvesting of resources in space. Heat Control is pretty much a necessity for FFT, as you've identified. That should pretty much have you covered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aborted Yolk Posted November 28 Share Posted November 28 Does anyone know of a way to make NUK fuel? Or fission pulse units? For the Hamilton nuclear pulse engine? I'm just wondering if I can build a base that can make fuel for it as I use a bus style hauler that runs on this engine and it sucks that the only place I can refuel it at is homeworld it would be nice if I could synthesize fuel for it and launch refuel missions into space around my other planetary bases Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eclipse 32 Posted Tuesday at 12:43 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 12:43 AM (edited) my ship's heat loop is refusing to cool at all. i can't tell what's producing heat, i turned off the engine, and there's nothing else in the system that's active except for a bunch of stock large radiators. i have a ramscoop on the front, but it's off, since the loop is too hot. my ship is low on fuel, so i need to activate the scoop, but it's too hot to turn it on. is there a cheat to reset global system heat? EDIT: it's only loop 0 that's borked, everything else is fine Edited Tuesday at 12:51 AM by Eclipse 32 did some testing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IAlsoPlayKsp Posted yesterday at 06:45 AM Share Posted yesterday at 06:45 AM (edited) Is there any way to make Fission Pellets and Fission Fragments less ambiguous? For instance, the Casaba antimatter engine, according to its right-click menu, burns "Fi P". The tank that holds this however, is labelled a "Nuclear Pellet" tank. It also doesn't help that another tank (which looks quite similar mind you) called the fissionable tank holds "Frag" which is burned by the Asimov engine. It also definitely doesn't help that B9PartSwitch labels Frag as "Fissionable Particles" and there is an entirely separate other tank for "Fi P" which I guess is pellets. Also the Vulcan smelter labels Fi P (pellets) as FiPellets and Frag/FissionableParticles as FiParticles. I'm not quite sure what my main point is, but I think one could make it a lot more clear / newbie-friendly. Not a big issue tho, and I won't complain if you don't fix it On 11/28/2024 at 3:18 PM, Aborted Yolk said: Does anyone know of a way to make NUK fuel? Or fission pulse units? For the Hamilton nuclear pulse engine? I'm just wondering if I can build a base that can make fuel for it as I use a bus style hauler that runs on this engine and it sucks that the only place I can refuel it at is homeworld it would be nice if I could synthesize fuel for it and launch refuel missions into space around my other planetary bases There is not, to my knowledge, a way to make NUK. (Though I'm not quite sure why you would pick this engine; it has rather low efficiency, high cost to run, and as you said, no ISRU refueling capabilities. I'd recommend a less powerful/efficient engine that can be refueled, or just using a terrifyingly efficient engine like the X-6 Clarke if your up for it. These are just my two cents though, you do you! ) Edited yesterday at 06:48 AM by IAlsoPlayKsp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IAlsoPlayKsp Posted yesterday at 07:03 AM Share Posted yesterday at 07:03 AM On 12/16/2024 at 7:43 PM, Eclipse 32 said: my ship's heat loop is refusing to cool at all. i can't tell what's producing heat, i turned off the engine, and there's nothing else in the system that's active except for a bunch of stock large radiators. i have a ramscoop on the front, but it's off, since the loop is too hot. my ship is low on fuel, so i need to activate the scoop, but it's too hot to turn it on. is there a cheat to reset global system heat? EDIT: it's only loop 0 that's borked, everything else is fine Could I please see a picture, maybe a craft file or something, because loop 0 is perfectly fine for me. This issue is happening in flight, not just in the editor, so I can only think that there may be some thermal component you didn't notice. Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eclipse 32 Posted yesterday at 04:01 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:01 PM 8 hours ago, IAlsoPlayKsp said: Could I please see a picture, maybe a craft file or something, because loop 0 is perfectly fine for me. This issue is happening in flight, not just in the editor, so I can only think that there may be some thermal component you didn't notice. Thanks! i message here from a different computer then i play on, and my dad owns the computer i play on, and i don't want to fight with transferring screenshots, or just finding them in dad's tangled mess of a files app. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IAlsoPlayKsp Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 1 hour ago, Eclipse 32 said: i message here from a different computer then i play on, and my dad owns the computer i play on, and i don't want to fight with transferring screenshots, or just finding them in dad's tangled mess of a files app. I'm not quite sure how to phrase this online without sounding a bit passive aggressive, but you have just gave us an issue with absolutely zero way for us to track it down, recreate it, or even see the problem... what was the point of asking the question? No one can solve it without info. Please provide adequate info next time (GameData, ksp.log, pictures even) or don't ask it all. Sorry if I sound rude but it's a bit of a pet peeve of mine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eclipse 32 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago it's fine, i understand. i don't even know what's going on, how to reproduce it, nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.