Kryten Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 sorry for bumping this post but i have a few questions i need to ask is there any way to keep all of the parts with out messing up the original vanilla parts thanks Bryan Ashenden AKA meteorite 101 Change the \'name\' parameter in the .cfg\'s of the conflicting parts to something else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest meteorite 101 Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 but i want to keep the stock parts with out messing up the game i love this pack but he should had made kerbal space program friendly. just saying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OtherDalfite Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 but i want to keep the stock parts Nova\'s pack is made to replace stock parts. Keeping them would only make things silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryten Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 I know-in order to do that you need to change the \'name\' parameters and folder names of the parts that would overwrite existing parts (e.g. liquidengine1), so that you can put them into your parts folder without overwriting the stock parts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryten Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 Nova\'s pack is made to replace stock parts. Keeping them would only make things silly.He might just want to use things like the fairings or lander legs, and not be bothered by the balance changes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest meteorite 101 Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 yep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Zoom Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 If it\'s just a few parts that you want, I suggest that you open up the zip file and copy (drag and drop) ONLY those parts into your Parts folder.That\'s how I got my first set of lander legs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OtherDalfite Posted January 8, 2012 Share Posted January 8, 2012 He might just want to use things like the fairings or lander legs, and not be bothered by the balance changes.But, but, YOU\'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO DO THAT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaSilisko Posted January 9, 2012 Author Share Posted January 9, 2012 Right. This will make Sordid happy:Scheduled:Mk3 pod remodelMk4 pod remodel (slight)0.75m Vostok pod (separate release, if you suggest it be named Kostok I\'ll kill you) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OtherDalfite Posted January 9, 2012 Share Posted January 9, 2012 if you suggest it be named Kostok I\'ll kill you)So.. tempting. Any pics on it yet? Pics help with name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icefire Posted January 9, 2012 Share Posted January 9, 2012 Ball Bearing Pod. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OtherDalfite Posted January 9, 2012 Share Posted January 9, 2012 Name it 'The Egg' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaSilisko Posted January 9, 2012 Author Share Posted January 9, 2012 So.. tempting. Any pics on it yet? Pics help with name.Through the shoutbox, I have decided I will call it Volk (latin-ized russian for Wolf) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GroundHOG-2010 Posted January 9, 2012 Share Posted January 9, 2012 Through the shoutbox, I have decided I will call it Volk (latin-ized russian for Wolf)Good name. Better than The Egg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NovaSilisko Posted January 9, 2012 Author Share Posted January 9, 2012 Not shown is the vanilla RCS tank and thruster that would be attached. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ThatCrazyPilot Posted January 9, 2012 Share Posted January 9, 2012 That\'s a nice ????!Now add a ????. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GroundHOG-2010 Posted January 9, 2012 Share Posted January 9, 2012 I would much rather have a ??????? ?????. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ThatCrazyPilot Posted January 9, 2012 Share Posted January 9, 2012 I would much rather have a ??????? ?????.Sounds more like a launching vehicle to me =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GroundHOG-2010 Posted January 9, 2012 Share Posted January 9, 2012 Sounds more like a launching vehicle to me =PThey are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicontis Posted January 9, 2012 Share Posted January 9, 2012 That new pod looks very spiffy, albeit a bit high on the polycount... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC3craze Posted January 9, 2012 Share Posted January 9, 2012 That new pod looks very spiffy, albeit a bit high on the polycount...Doesn\'t look that bad, but then again running KSP is like throwing cotton at my CPU.But this is a gaming rig, so yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technical Ben Posted January 9, 2012 Share Posted January 9, 2012 You\'ll be amazed what KSP seems to handle as to Poly counts with no worries. As lone as it\'s not stupid large or unnecessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC3craze Posted January 9, 2012 Share Posted January 9, 2012 You\'ll be amazed what KSP seems to handle as to Poly counts with no worries. As lone as it\'s not stupid large or unnecessary.This guy is right, if its too large, Unity doesn\'t like to load it. I have run tests with huge spheres will bunches of polys. But of course Nova will optimize it as much as he can.Keep making parts Nova! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technical Ben Posted January 9, 2012 Share Posted January 9, 2012 Well, the thing about the sphere is, as long as it\'s a low poly sphere, it will probably top out a few more polys than the default command pod. As it has less 'detail' added, but more smoothness... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OtherDalfite Posted January 9, 2012 Share Posted January 9, 2012 I would much rather have a ??????? ?????.Sure. Let\'s name it something that you can\'t type on an English only keyboard. > Also, no need to be a dick about the name I offered. I was only kidding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts