what kind of parts would you guys want? (beyond 0.20)

[Veshpa]

i really want a bi and tri rocket adapter for large rockets and an IVA for the hitchhiker Storage

what do you guys wish to see in the game?

[rodion_herrera]

Ok, just to show that I do like mods, and not being a "purist", I actually like the innovative hinges in the Damned Robotics pack--I believe that hinges and arms and all sorts of things that fold away (joints for trusses) should be part of the default structures pack. It makes a lot of sense--it means you can now have spacecraft like SS1/SS2 where you can do "feathered" re-entry, via the folding tail. And of course, for the REALLY creative, it basically means stuff like Robotech/Gundam/Transformers into the fray.

[StainX]

All the Parts from the KSPX Pack would be nice!

[SkyRender]

Outside of what's been announced as coming, it would be nifty to see some inflatable modules eventually. Placing pressurized living spaces up in space with what amounts to a glorified bouncy castle just seems very Kerbal to me.

[Devo]

Magnetic boots, give me those and I'll never ask for anything again.

[trvtannenberg]

Stock payload fairings.

[hawk_za]

stock gps and gps mapping system nothing wrong with mapsat but would be nice to not have to mod the game :>

[Rareden]

more science and discovery, a point to colonizing and such

[BuzzKerman]

dynamically sizeable fuel tanks. The diameter can be fixed, and selectable from the parts lists, but you would be able to adjust length according to your mission profile.

[EleSigma]

Besides other things already mentioned like the movable hinge nodes and more sciencey things. A two-manned capsule to bridge the one and three manned capsule. That and maybe a cupola that isn't a command pod.

[bsalis]

Mechanical parts (ie. Damned Robotics)

That's the main one for me.

Bigger wings would be nice too.

[DerekL1963]

a cupola that isn't a command pod.

This - and other station type pods.

[Kerbface]

-Larger fuel tanks

-Space shuttle style cargo fuselage

-Telescopic non-hinged landing legs

-Hinges and other moving parts

-Quad adapter

-More types of habitats, including inflatable

-Hallways between habitats for bases and more complex ships and stations so Kerbals don't have to EVA

[sidew]

- Fairing (like KW Rocketry)

- Engines with multiple DeLaval Nozzles

- Linear aerospike

- 2 man capsule

[Flixxbeatz]

Stock payload fairings.

I second this.

But I think this won't happen until the in-game aerodynamics gets a total overhaul.

[Brotoro]

A part that provides torque like a capsule does, but is more compact (its silly to have to add a capsule just to get extra torque on an unmanned ship...especially if the game insists on populating the capsule with unwanted kerbals).

[wbcundiff]

A part that provides torque like a capsule does, but is more compact (its silly to have to add a capsule just to get extra torque on an unmanned ship...especially if the game insists on populating the capsule with unwanted kerbals).

do you mean SAS parts? they have more torque than capsules don't they?

[macegee]

More space station and satellite/probe parts.

[Torham234]

more science parts like cameras, more antennas and satellite dishes, measuring instruments, telescopes

[Szkeptik]

A LOT of surface base parts. Even ones that can be built by eva Kerbals on the surface and are immobile in nature.

Landing legs that have variable movement ranges so I can place them on the craft any way I want and have them move just as much as I want them to.

Moving parts like robot arms and cranes, bay doors etc.

[Flixxbeatz]

more science parts like cameras, more antennas and satellite dishes, measuring instruments, telescopes

working science parts.

[xandski]

Longer ladder segments for the side of ships would be a life saver (literally) for me.

Also more science-y things like cameras etc (as mentioned above) although a stock Canadarm would be beyond amazing.

[erkha343]

Cargo holds and cargo containers, and engines with high gimbal, so we can do space shuttle like launchers.

[Sephta]

do you mean SAS parts? they have more torque than capsules don't they?

Yes, SAS delivers torque - but only to keep your rocket steady. Capsules can rotate your ship only with torque - that would be nice on a drone only rocket, as the drone cores don't have enough power to rotate anything. So - a powerd gyro to rotate your ship without RCS would be very nice.

[rodion_herrera]

Oh right...manual gimbal adjustments...but this could be done IF there was some kind of joints/hinge system (manual control) in place, so if only one can be implemented, I still want hinges/flexing (and lockable) elbow joints.