Jump to content

The Armageddon Thread

SuperWeegee4000

By SuperWeegee4000
in KSP1 Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

lajoswinkler

lajoswinkler

Posted
Posted
I haven't seen Gravity, but I doubt it has any chance of stealing the crown from Armageddon. That said, I personally like Armageddon a lot more than it's contemporary Deep Impact. Armageddon doesn't pretend to be realistic, Deep Impact does, and fails. Of course this is where Gravity has issues too.

wat... :huh:

Currently, I've only found Class C and A 'roids. :(

Timewarp and you'll see every kind spawning.

And don't say 'roids, that's means something else. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KerbMav

KerbMav

Posted
Posted
I remember the devs a while ago talking about some kind of reputation system for your space program. If that ever gets implemented then diverting should give you rep, and allowing a large asteroid to hit a populated area for example could cost you rep.

Should come as a mission then, random disasters that can be averted by "not looking" (untracking the impacter) wouldnt make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KerbMav

KerbMav

Posted
Posted
I wonder what the devs were thinking to handle the Asteroid dimensions like Bra-Cup-Sizes...

Not that I dont like it. ;)

Asteroids are classified by their orbit and composition, the latter actually using letters, but not A, B, C ...

I could not find a source for standardized classification by size though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MalfunctionM1Ke

MalfunctionM1Ke

Posted
Posted
I know landing an asteroid on Kerbin doesn't do much, but has anyone tried landing one on Jool yet? I'm curious to see how the game handles this one and see whether it draws the kracken in or not.

Once you skip under Jools "Surface - 0m", the Kraken is never far away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CaptainKipard

CaptainKipard

Posted
Posted (edited)
Kerbal space program: Play it once and Hollywood physics aren't fun anymore.

Very true

Should come as a mission then, random disasters that can be averted by "not looking" (untracking the impacter) wouldnt make sense.

I guess so. I imagine that if that ever materialises, they would have to rework the asteroid sizes maybe and the probabilities of imacts.

Now let's talk more about bras so that we can alienate what few female gamers this community has.

Sexism is fun isn't it?

Edited by Cpt. Kipard
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NecroBones

NecroBones

Posted
Posted
Gravity is much better than Armageddon. Armageddon was officially the WORST space movie, ever.

I even made a thread on imdb where I named all 54 flaws.

Seriously. Usually I can turn my brain off (mostly) and just enjoy the movie for what it is. But Armageddon? I came out of that one ranting about a couple of dozen problems with it. I just couldn't get past it.

The one thing I liked in that movie was the line about the spacecraft being built by the lowest bidder. What could possibly go wrong? Heh. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
samiamthelaw

samiamthelaw

Posted
Posted
Yes, but seeing that the asteroids are seemingly indestructable ...

Are they actually indescructible? I saw them "sink" when impacting water in preview videos. Are they destroyed if they hit terrain too hard?

I suppose what I'm trying to say is, can I destroy an asteroid by ramming it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...