Jump to content

[1.12.X] Tantares - Stockalike Soyuz and MIR [28][15.02.2025][Mars Expedition]


Beale

Recommended Posts

  On 8/28/2016 at 1:29 PM, CobaltWolf said:

oh? I thought you were doing Soyuz then N1, now that you've done LK you will have refreshed your whole moonshot stack.

Expand  

Yes you are on the right trail, sadly I have done as usual and lost track of plans :D 
The N1 and Moon poodles (maybe some science parts?) is the immediate priority soon.

As even more, I had installed a new computer and not yet installed Unity (But, of course Wings3D and Photoshop!).

uq94qLB.png
5MDbwRN.png
ZUtTh0I.png

Edited by Beale
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 8/30/2016 at 2:32 PM, Jack Wolfe said:

After finally arriving at a workable UR700, I can see why they scrapped the design. Using an N1 variant is a lot less convoluted.

Expand  

Plus it had a far smaller chance of giving the entire population of Kazakhstan cancer.

Edited by billbobjebkirk
Removed picture
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 8/30/2016 at 5:13 PM, Jack Wolfe said:

So you were. Good to see you're still around. :)

Expand  

I am really not :) I got into photography instead. i also have a hot girlfriend now... No time for Rocket models :/  Kinda of a shame cause I'd love to make my impression of Spacex MCT... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 8/30/2016 at 5:15 PM, CardBoardBoxProcessor said:

I am really not :) I got into photography instead. i also have a hot girlfriend now... No time for Rocket models :/  Kinda of a shame cause I'd love to make my impression of Spacex MCT... 

Expand  
 

Your talents are missed here, that's for sure. But I agree that a hot girlfriend can be far more interesting that rocket models!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 8/30/2016 at 5:17 PM, Jack Wolfe said:

Your talents are missed here, that's for sure. But I agree that a hot girlfriend can be far more interesting that rocket models!

Expand  

http://imgur.com/kPnLBQz - and my photography is better than my rockets. Certainly better than my stock texture attempts... 

 

does KSP allow for more combined modules these days? I recall being ahead of my time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 8/30/2016 at 5:21 PM, CardBoardBoxProcessor said:

http://imgur.com/kPnLBQz - and my photography is better than my rockets. Certainly better than my stock texture attempts... 

 

does KSP allow for more combined modules these days? I recall being ahead of my time

Expand  

 CBBP! You live! Not to hijack Beale's thread or take anything away from him 'cause his mod rocks, but I agree with Mr. Wolfe your talents are missed. Hope you find time to once again let us fly your creations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 8/31/2016 at 7:51 AM, Z3R0_0NL1N3 said:

There was this post from ages ago, and I thought these sort of panels by curtquarquesso would be coming, and I was hyped. This is something I want to see happen.

Expand  

Yeah! The question is, does @Beale have those files somewhere.

Additionally, @Beale have you seen @curtquarquesso recently? I've missed him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 8/30/2016 at 2:32 PM, Jack Wolfe said:

After finally arriving at a workable UR700, I can see why they scrapped the design. Using an N1 variant is a lot less convoluted.

 

Expand  

I also use the N1 stack to launch LK-700 (MK-700 :-)  ) missions, ends up being a LOT simpler as you pointed out.
Also a LOT cheaper in career mode. Constructing a functional UR-700 work-alike is over a quarter of a million funds, whereas the N1 stack (in my SSP mod anyway) is less than half that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 8/31/2016 at 3:43 PM, CobaltWolf said:

Yeah! The question is, does @Beale have those files somewhere.

Additionally, @Beale have you seen @curtquarquesso recently? I've missed him.

Expand  
  On 8/31/2016 at 3:44 PM, VenomousRequiem said:

Let's just ping @Beale some more and maybe he'll notice us. 

@Beale

 

@Beale

Expand  

BXLueYE.png

To answer: sadly no to both questions, I think the files are long lost (from moving PC and life events).

Sadly too, no sign of curtquarquesso in a very long time now, my right hand man is "MIA:( 
But, of course, people have lives to deal with.

  On 8/31/2016 at 3:58 PM, tjsnh said:

I also use the N1 stack to launch LK-700 (MK-700 :-)  ) missions, ends up being a LOT simpler as you pointed out.
Also a LOT cheaper in career mode. Constructing a functional UR-700 work-alike is over a quarter of a million funds, whereas the N1 stack (in my SSP mod anyway) is less than half that.

Expand  

Would you take offense if I stole the SSP money amounts? :) 
I think they are a lot better than my own.

  On 8/31/2016 at 7:51 AM, Z3R0_0NL1N3 said:

There was this post from ages ago, and I thought these sort of panels by curtquarquesso would be coming, and I was hyped. This is something I want to see happen.

Expand  

Ah!

Thanks for digging those from hundreds of pages ago, I had forgotten them.
The panels were in-game at one point, but I remember two problems:

  • Hard to tell direction the unfold (This can be fixed with different texture).
  • Mentioned earlier, hard to place on anything but a 1.25m cylinder.
Edited by Beale
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 8/31/2016 at 6:58 PM, Beale said:

Thanks for digging those from hundreds of pages ago, I had forgotten them.
The panels were in-game at one point, but I remember two problems:

  • Hard to tell direction the unfold (This can be fixed with different texture).
  • Mentioned earlier, hard to place on anything but a 1.25m cylinder.
Expand  

So the main problem is modularity.. maybe we can have couple sizes of these? Because I know that the mir modules and the russian iss modules had panels that folded in the same way..(also when it's not folded that way it means that you need wider fairing on the proton which makes it look weird)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 8/31/2016 at 7:31 PM, NeoFatalis said:

So the main problem is modularity.. maybe we can have couple sizes of these? Because I know that the mir modules and the russian iss modules had panels that folded in the same way..(also when it's not folded that way it means that you need wider fairing on the proton which makes it look weird)

Expand  

I think maybe...
It's a tricky decision, either design may make some unhappy, I do not really want to support separate alternatives (snug fold + normal fold + sun tracking + static + shenzou panels) 8 variants! 8!

Can also do different style entirely solar panels that fold tighter to fairings?

Soyuz_7K-OK(A)_drawing.png

Edited by Beale
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 8/28/2016 at 1:48 PM, Beale said:

Yes you are on the right trail, sadly I have done as usual and lost track of plans :D 
The N1 and Moon poodles (maybe some science parts?) is the immediate priority soon.

As even more, I had installed a new computer and not yet installed Unity (But, of course Wings3D and Photoshop!).

uq94qLB.png
5MDbwRN.png
ZUtTh0I.png

Expand  

These are nice, but they're so.. bland. Too much grey. I suggest adding more color, especially to the engine block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...