Bersagliere81 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 I love so much this mod. It is one of my must have. Hoping for a Real Fuel compatibility Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 On 10/18/2016 at 1:37 PM, Bersagliere81 said: I love so much this mod. It is one of my must have. Hoping for a Real Fuel compatibility Expand Can't wait to see what you come up with! I'm sure @Beale will link the configs or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minepagan Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 (edited) On 10/15/2016 at 7:25 AM, trooperMNG said: the author I forgot to quote deleted his comment. He was talking about a forum member who's in trouble because of hurricane Matthew. Never mind Expand Deleted by mods. Said that 1 post (own thread) was enough. Sorry. Edited October 18, 2016 by minepagan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotAgain Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 I've just tried to boot this up in 1.2, and it seems to work, other than the fact that it sends my save (on year 4, day 87) back to year 1, day 1. Is there any way to temporarily fix this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted October 22, 2016 Author Share Posted October 22, 2016 On 10/22/2016 at 6:55 AM, NotAgain said: I've just tried to boot this up in 1.2, and it seems to work, other than the fact that it sends my save (on year 4, day 87) back to year 1, day 1. Is there any way to temporarily fix this? Expand Thank you for experimenting. Do you have any other mods installed? / Did you have any other mods installed on this save? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drakenex Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Any kind soul who can point me to a TAC MM patch for Tantares? Can't find anything good. Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pTrevTrevs Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 On 10/22/2016 at 6:55 AM, NotAgain said: I've just tried to boot this up in 1.2, and it seems to work, other than the fact that it sends my save (on year 4, day 87) back to year 1, day 1. Is there any way to temporarily fix this? Expand It may be possible to change the time back by tampering with the persistent file, but I've never tried it, nor have I ever heard of anyone who has. *[citation needed] intensifies* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotAgain Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 On 10/22/2016 at 2:20 PM, Beale said: Thank you for experimenting. Do you have any other mods installed? / Did you have any other mods installed on this save? Expand Yes, I do. I'm going to try a clean install and try the same thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotAgain Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 (edited) @Beale, I've tried loading Tantares in a clean install, and (bar all the missing craft due to the other mods not being present) it works fine. I shall now embark upon my quest to discover which of my mods is conflicting with Tantares. Edited October 23, 2016 by NotAgain SPaG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kopapaka Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted October 23, 2016 Author Share Posted October 23, 2016 (edited) On 10/23/2016 at 7:41 AM, NotAgain said: @Beale, I've tried loading Tantares in a clean install, and (bar all the missing craft due to the other mods not being present) it works fine. I shall now embark upon my quest to discover which of my mods is conflicting with Tantares. Expand Great! For future reference, I think a part mod like this will very rarely cause problems (Even when using an out of date version what you have done). On 10/23/2016 at 5:41 PM, kopapaka said: Expand Great direct ascent lander! The one part is taking so long! But, progress is progress. Note Edited October 23, 2016 by Beale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny88 Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 That conical tank framework is so pretty. Love the engine bells too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joeybafoey Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 I'm lovin' it! Once she's out, I'm going to do a 99.99% accurate playthrough with the knowledge I've gained from Nick Stevens' book. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotAgain Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 On 10/23/2016 at 9:12 PM, Beale said: For future reference, I think a part mod like this will very rarely cause problems (Even when using an out of date version what you have done). Expand I know, I'm checking it individually against all the mods I have installed to find out what's causing the problem. This could take a while... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjsnh Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 On 10/23/2016 at 5:41 PM, kopapaka said: Expand Similar to the DA-profile mission I use for minmus, but I usually use the 1.875 cargo bay just below the capsule and put the science experiments inside, to give the whole thing a more clean look on top. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legcutter Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 (edited) On 10/23/2016 at 9:12 PM, Beale said: Expand Hi Beale, this new N-1 is looking great! One small thing about this particular detali - note the engine shroud at 2:25 And many warmest thanks to you for making the main reason i'm still playing 1.1.3 Edited October 24, 2016 by Legcutter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 Should we really be using that video as reference? The animation is awful, especially on the lander, which makes me question the detail of the rest... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legcutter Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 (edited) On 10/24/2016 at 4:22 PM, CobaltWolf said: Should we really be using that video as reference? The animation is awful, especially on the lander, which makes me question the detail of the rest... Expand Energia corp. site confirms this to be the third stage (block V) of N-1 rocket, so awful animation is applied to good models. Edited October 24, 2016 by Legcutter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joeybafoey Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 (edited) On 10/24/2016 at 4:22 PM, CobaltWolf said: Should we really be using that video as reference? The animation is awful, especially on the lander, which makes me question the detail of the rest... Expand We should. Nick Stevens, the fellow who made the animation, is one of but a few western experts on the rocket. If you're interested, in fact, I suggest buying his book, "N-1: For the Moon and Mars" (my copy came yesterday). https://www.amazon.com/N-1-Soviet-Superbooster-English-Russian/dp/0989991407 I asked @Beale about the engine plate a few pages back and he said he wasn't including it for the sake of simplicity. Edited October 24, 2016 by Joeybafoey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted October 24, 2016 Author Share Posted October 24, 2016 (edited) 2.5 => 1.875 => 1.25 Block G sits inside. Edited October 24, 2016 by Beale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niemand303 Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 On 9/10/2016 at 7:09 AM, NeoFatalis said: This was posted in this thread about a year ago and was made by SnowWhite but the last time she visited the forums was in May and she wasn't very active then either Expand I can ask him if he'll continue working on it or at least share the model. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoFatalis Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 On 10/24/2016 at 10:53 PM, Niemand303 said: I can ask him if he'll continue working on it or at least share the model. Expand That would be awesome Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calvin_Maclure Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 On 10/24/2016 at 10:53 PM, Niemand303 said: I can ask him if he'll continue working on it or at least share the model. Expand That's hot! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 On 10/24/2016 at 4:22 PM, CobaltWolf said: Should we really be using that video as reference? The animation is awful, especially on the lander, which makes me question the detail of the rest... Expand I agree, the flight animations are pants. But overall the modelling is some of the best I've seen. That is, until @Beale rocks our sock off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joeybafoey Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 On 10/25/2016 at 12:12 AM, Jack Wolfe said: That is, until @Beale rocks our sock off. Expand I'm ridiculously excited for this. I thought I was excited for the last Percy Jackson book however long ago, but I won't lie, this may top that. On 10/24/2016 at 10:39 PM, Beale said: 2.5 => 1.875 => 1.25 Block G sits inside. Expand Is that a stock fairing base? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.