Sigma88

or maybe you were smiling but then tripped and fell on the asphalt

I never had issues with those and transpatency Is there a better option?

kopernicus versioning have been made very explicit to avoid any kind of confusion:you need to make sure the first 3 numbers from Kopernicus version and KSP version are the same: KSP 1.3.0 Kopernicus 1.3.0-4 COMPATIBLE KSP 1.3.0 Kopernicus 1.2.1-4 NOT COMPATIBLE the best way to make sure you don't encounter bugs would be to use the Kopernicus version that was live at the time of the latest release in this case, since the mod has not been updated from the author for almost a year, it's probably best to refer to information provided in the post linking to the new version developed by a different author (in this case, @Galileo ) TLDR: I think the latest version of kopernicus will be just fine if you are using OPM_Galileo

I use photoshop, but I assume gimp would work very similarly make sure you select the correct types: DTX5 (colormaps) DTXnm (normals) DTX1 [L8] (heightmaps) also, remember to mirror the images vertically as DDS are loaded differently than PNG I have no issue using DDS for heightmaps, you just need to select the correct type (L8)

Kopernicus is version locked which means running kopernicus 1.2.x on ksp 1.3.x will result in kopernicus disabling itself

Balls

No you can't do that with MM but I've made a mod that can be used to do what you want https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/160151-wip130-sigma-scidefrenamer/

if you don't experience the issue with only kopernicus, but need to istall EVE/SVE/SVT it means it's either a bug of those mods or an incompatibility issue between those mods and kopernicus. if that's the case I'm not familiar enough with those mods to give you support, so you might want to try asking the devs of those mods. BUT @Galileo already told you it's a SVT issue and that he will fix it when he has time, so I'm not sure what more I can do for you

If you do a clean install of kopernicus (Only ksp and kopernicus requirements, no other mods) You should find that the sun is unaffected. If you are still seeing issues on such an install click the nyan cat in my sig and follow the instructions

I posted the answer to this exact question in the last post before yours I suggest you take a look at least at the last post on a thread before asking questions that might be already answered

Galactic Neighborhood v0.4.3 fixed compatibility for a couple of planet packs and added custom loading screens all the links are available in the OP If you want to follow the development of my mods: If you want to buy me a cup of coffee: Changelog: v0.4.3 - Fix for multiple planets with Kerbin template - Added Sigma88LoadingScreens plugin - Fixed GPP compatibility - Fixed AlternisKerbolRekerjiggered compatibility

just a heads up to @Tynton and anybody that might be interested I am considering adding compatibility for this mod into my GalacticNeighborhood I usually ask the dev (Tynton in this case) for a name and type for the star, but given that you already have a custom star I will use that one did you use a particular real life star as an analogue?

a small bit of info for those that might still want to use tracking solar panels: currently there is a "bug" in kopernius where the solar panel at the moment of deciding which star to track, will focus on the star that is more centered in its field of view. we have already changed it so that from next release the solar panels will choose the star that provides the most Ec/s in the meantime, it's sufficient to rotate your craft until the solar panels face the closest star (ciro) of course with stations it will be a bit more difficult, but at least you have an option while you wait for the next kopernicus release to drop

no, KSP needs the center of the universe to be a star called "Sun" This is why I used that setup in the first place, If it was as simple as giving it another name I would have probably done that