RealKerbal3x

So there's no previews or anything? Makes me think that SQUAD is planning something big for 1.7

@MiscelanousItem Welcome to the forums To do that you need 'advanced tweakables' enabled in the game settings. Then you can set it to autostrut to the root, heaviest, parent or grandparent part. Though a word of warning: If you're playing career or science mode, you'll need to have struts unlocked in the tech tree before you can use autostrut.

It adds statics for placement via Kerbal Konstructs. No parts.

Yes, that would be extremely useful. I was once scrolling through the list of named quicksaves for ten minutes trying to find the right one, so having them in chronological order would be a godsend.

I believe @damonvv is waiting for an official render from SpaceX before he starts making a stainless steel Starship. Also, I could be wrong but I think he’s going to add the 2017 BFR back in as an option too.

If you want the three-engine mode you need Kerbal Actuators

@damonvv Looks awesome! A quick question: Is it RAM-free like @Omega482's KK buildings, or is it your original art?

Thing is, that would almost double the amount of part textures in the game, which would mean that RAM use would skyrocket. Also, having variants with completely different geometry to each other could cause issues. You could try Old Parts Redux:

Is it an Apollo style mission? If that’s the case they can just EVA their way back to the orbiter. And by the way, you don’t really land on Gilly, more like dock with it

@Pak Ignore the issue I reported above. Apparently the solution was as simple as reinstalling CA, and after that the dV system started recognising the OMS like any other engine.

Sorry, didn't notice this initially. By interval I mean at what time after deploying satellite 1 into its orbit do you deploy satellite 2? When sat 1 is at apoapsis or some other time?

Yep, still works! (at least for me). Not many mods have actually broken since 1.3.

Nice! But how the kraken did someone get an LES to the Mun?

I’ve tried stock monoprop engines as well as the ones from Near Future Spacecraft, and the dV system doesn’t seem to have any quarrel with them, so it’s probably something about the CA engines that’s confusing it.

The new Poodle is certainly an improvement, but I think that it should have a couple variants, for example a 1.875m ‘bare’ one. Regarding the new Terrier, I think it’s a big improvement over the old version. Plus, the ‘bare’ variant makes clustering engines so much easier.