Jump to content

SpaceX Discussion Thread


Skylon

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Racescort666 said:

@CatastrophicFailure, I have been hyped. There was no controlling it. A good weather forecast sometimes does that.

Well, we’re within a week, now. Maybe it’s time to start loading up the ol’ Hype Train. :D

 

Edited by CatastrophicFailure
Ithinkivanithinkican
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, cubinator said:

a spectacular explosion if there's an issue with a booster after separation.

A single booster exploding on a nearly empty tank would not be much of an explosion. Look at the videos of failed landings; the barge at most suffered from some scorch marks and debris.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, cubinator said:

I realized a couple days ago while thinking about how I'm going to write the launch theme that we could see both a successful mission and a spectacular explosion if there's an issue with a booster after separation.

Speaking of boosters, has a controlled separation like they’re planning ever even been done before?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, _Augustus_ said:

A single booster exploding on a nearly empty tank would not be much of an explosion. Look at the videos of failed landings; the barge at most suffered from some scorch marks and debris.

Still noteworthy enough to make a difference in the music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, CatastrophicFailure said:

Speaking of boosters, has a controlled separation like they’re planning ever even been done before?

Big side boosters have been separated before (Shuttle SRB, Delta 4 Heavy, Soyuz). It has to be done in a controlled fashion, of course, to prevent collision. But without using pyros (don't actually know what Soyuz uses), with continuing active guidance and maneuvering of the boosters after separation? Yeah, don't think so. Really doubt that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hyperspace is just misspelled Hype Space, right?

Lets Jump!

 

My buddy Elon will get those engines working on time - or this'll be the shortest launch of all time...

Edited by KSK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably not on-topic :

On 2/2/2018 at 10:24 PM, sevenperforce said:

Elon posited that two FH launches is all it would take to drop astronauts on the moon and bring them back.

Who would a private human launch falls into jurisdiction-wise ?

I guess after Dragon sends people to ISS, maybe Musk can pull up a show or something.

Edited by YNM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, StrandedonEarth said:

Big side boosters have been separated before (Shuttle SRB, Delta 4 Heavy, Soyuz). It has to be done in a controlled fashion, of course, to prevent collision. But without using pyros (don't actually know what Soyuz uses), with continuing active guidance and maneuvering of the boosters after separation? Yeah, don't think so. Really doubt that.

In a sense, the Shuttle SRBs were actively controlled post-sep, since they were tracked and chuted down, but the sep mechanism was single-use, they used pyros, and the SRBs were essentially inert cylinders all the way to splashdown, so it's not really comparable.

The Soyuz  boosters vent the LOX ullage pressure from the nose of each booster, nudging them away from the core.

14 hours ago, cubinator said:

I suppose the engines can gimbal to help the boosters GTFO, as the pushers are surely not as strong as any variant of Sepatron rocket. I'm very excited to see it happen any way.

As far as we know, sep will take place post-MECO-1, so the engines on the boosters will not aid in separation.

The cold-gas thrusters on the top of the boosters can push them away from the core, but the primary concern is that the CoM will be high enough that this would cause rotation, potentially slamming the engine cluster into the core before it can clear. Two possibilities exist: one, that the lower attachment points have a rotational degree of freedom, allowing the upper attachments to be released first so that the boosters yaw away from the core before the lower attachments are released. The other, that the lower attachments have pneumatic pushers to shove the octawebs apart with enough force to counteract thruster-induced rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Zenit boosters for Energia used pyros for joint separation, then used a second set of pyros to separate from each others, then used a drogue on the tail to re-enter nose-first, then cut the drogue and popped mains at the empty CoM, then deployed landing legs and fired a third set of pyros to brake at horizontal touchdown. Probably the most complex solution for sep and recovery, but surprisingly error-proof. 

I recently did strap-on boosters with liquid retrothrusters near the CoM. Used action groups to fire the retrothrusters for separation, then switched back to the main engines for a boostback burn to KSC, then cut the engines, popped drogues, popped mains, deployed landing legs, and fired the retrothrusters again for soft touchdown.

Edited by sevenperforce
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sevenperforce said:

As far as we know, sep will take place post-MECO-1, so the engines on the boosters will not aid in separation.

I remember hearing a while back that they would keep one engine running on the boosters, specifically to “fly” away under control, presumably with help from the pushers for the initial oomph. Whether this is still the plan, I have no idea. They can’t give them too much of a rotational shove or they’ll tumble out of control. 

Intereting aside on the Energia boosters, do you have a source for pics of that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CatastrophicFailure said:

I remember hearing a while back that they would keep one engine running on the boosters, specifically to “fly” away under control, presumably with help from the pushers for the initial oomph. Whether this is still the plan, I have no idea. They can’t give them too much of a rotational shove or they’ll tumble out of control. 

I heard that proposed, but not by anyone connected.

13 minutes ago, CatastrophicFailure said:

Intereting aside on the Energia boosters, do you have a source for pics of that?

Yep!

Spoiler

trajectoire-blocA-grand-en.jpg

blocA-en.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...