Jump to content

what's the sabre engine's secret sauce?


Nuke

Recommended Posts

we have all seen the sabre engine in various articles and videos on skylon. and reaction engines tells you how almost everything works, almost. their secret sauce is most definitely their anti-icing system. and we know it works because they have conducted pre-cooler tests. so what do the smarter people of the forum think? how would you keep a giant precooler from freezing up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The secret sauce to the warp drive unit in my carport is also a mystery. 
 

;) 

 

How long have they been working on that thing? I’m the first to complain about Blue Origin, but these guys seem even less interested in actually doing something.

A quick google suggests work since the 80s?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, tater said:

The secret sauce to the warp drive unit in my carport is also a mystery. 
 

;) 

 

How long have they been working on that thing? I’m the first to complain about Blue Origin, but these guys seem even less interested in actually doing something.

A quick google suggests work since the 80s?!

 

For what it's worth, Chris Roberts has been working on on an unreleased uncompleted space sim game for over a decade.

Meanwhile Elon builds actual spaceships and flies them in less time LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Blue Origin. I want them to fly big, cool rockets to space. I want them to land stuff on the Moon, I want Bezos to get people "living and working in space."

I like SABRE and Skylon, seems really cool. But they seem to be doing this with money raised from bake sales or something. I recall reading some story where they got some millions (of Pounds presumably), and all I could think was that it wasn't even what a company in the US would get to make a powerpoint presentation rocket (Dynetics got $253M to submit a paper lander design incapable of landing).

I wish them the best, but at a certain point they need to just build the thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tater said:

I like Blue Origin. I want them to fly big, cool rockets to space. I want them to land stuff on the Moon, I want Bezos to get people "living and working in space."

I like SABRE and Skylon, seems really cool. But they seem to be doing this with money raised from bake sales or something. I recall reading some story where they got some millions (of Pounds presumably), and all I could think was that it wasn't even what a company in the US would get to make a powerpoint presentation rocket (Dynetics got $253M to submit a paper lander design incapable of landing).

I wish them the best, but at a certain point they need to just build the thing.

i think they plan on marketing the heat exchangers for other applications. lots of things require high performance heat exchangers. so any industrial process that needs to remove a lot of heat from a working fluid in a very short period of time is going to benefit from the technology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"You see good sir, when you put money in this end, you get cool-looking spaceships fro the other end!"

3 hours ago, Nuke said:

we have all seen the sabre engine in various articles and videos on skylon. and reaction engines tells you how almost everything works, almost. their secret sauce is most definitely their anti-icing system. and we know it works because they have conducted pre-cooler tests. so what do the smarter people of the forum think? how would you keep a giant precooler from freezing up?

I remembered they use some new techniques to create channels that are about 0.1mm wide. That should allow heat to be rapidly exchanged, cooling the air and heating up the fuel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nuke said:

i think they plan on marketing the heat exchangers for other applications. lots of things require high performance heat exchangers. so any industrial process that needs to remove a lot of heat from a working fluid in a very short period of time is going to benefit from the technology.

I want the spaceplane ;)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's only really useful for crew, but a spaceplane for crew would be an excellent resource. Depp space spacecraft could then mostly stay in space (where they belong), with crew safely brought up like so:

Orion_III_exterior.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, tater said:

I want the spaceplane ;)

Even with Sabre, that would be difficult.  The problem with SSTO is that approximately for every ton your SSTO can lift to orbit, a TSTO can be designed to do the same thing, and deliver the same tonnage to orbit.  And by tonnage, I mean the SSTO payload, plus the mass of the SABRE engines, plus the mass of whatever fuel tank is needed for all that extra delta-v (note that while SABRE 'first stage' might have extreme Isp, it is hydrolox, and that means a fuel tank with volume issues).

Officially, the secret sauce is the air/air cooling system for the intake air.

Really, the "secret sauce" is the magic of the promise of a "spaceplane".  That gets a lot of attention, but not enough money to really build anything but powerpoint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, wumpus said:

Even with Sabre, that would be difficult.  The problem with SSTO is that approximately for every ton your SSTO can lift to orbit, a TSTO can be designed to do the same thing, and deliver the same tonnage to orbit.  And by tonnage, I mean the SSTO payload, plus the mass of the SABRE engines, plus the mass of whatever fuel tank is needed for all that extra delta-v (note that while SABRE 'first stage' might have extreme Isp, it is hydrolox, and that means a fuel tank with volume issues).

Officially, the secret sauce is the air/air cooling system for the intake air.

Really, the "secret sauce" is the magic of the promise of a "spaceplane".  That gets a lot of attention, but not enough money to really build anything but powerpoint.

TSTO is indeed better (the Pan Am Clipper from 2001 is in fact TSTO ;) )

Spoiler

zrAHQVHrT6uXGNrhHFteti-970-80.jpg

Regardless, even an SSTO is OK for crew if it's logistically easier. Skylon is shown delivering small sats to LEO... they'll lose their shirt if they ever try that. Better to just take humans in comfort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kerbiloid said:

It could drop 007 from (sub)orbit.

Jokes aside, they might have better luck selling that tech to produce an SR-72 or any sort of suborbital strike platform than they do to stretch the mass ratio and produce a truly orbital spacecraft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 years ago Skylon seemed extremly awesome, but then came SpaceX and bley them out of the water. Starship seems to be better in almost every metric, the only niche i see for Skylon would be crew transport since it has some passive security in case of engine failures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, kerbiloid said:

Currently both are 3dMax. Just Staship has a once-flown mockup.

One, Starship SN15 is not a "mockup." The things sitting at JSC for human factors testing are "mockups," mockups don't actually do anything, definitionally.

The trouble of course is that while Reaction seems to be partnering with some larger companies (a good thing, since they otherwise didn't have any real money), the companies they partner with have no entrepreneurial bent to them—in short, they will build what some government will pay them for. I'm not seeing them get an orbital launch vehicle in advance of a world where—ignoring Starship entirely—we have F9, NG, and Neutron all competing for the commercial launch market with reusable boosters. SpaceX has had no reason to drop prices at all, that will require meaningful competition. We don't yet know where the floor is for retail launch cost on systems with reusable first stages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Elthy said:

10 years ago Skylon seemed extremly awesome, but then came SpaceX and bley them out of the water. Starship seems to be better in almost every metric, the only niche i see for Skylon would be crew transport since it has some passive security in case of engine failures.

But not really, it’s just a reusable heavy lift vehicle but it wouldn’t ever be able to be useful I the medium and small lift region and no way would be good for leo crew transport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SpaceFace545 said:

But not really, it’s just a reusable heavy lift vehicle but it wouldn’t ever be able to be useful I the medium and small lift region and no way would be good for leo crew transport.

I have no idea about crew safety, I think that's a long pole for Starship.

Small and medium lift? That's simply a cost issue. SpaceX bid Starship for a $7.95M contract to launch 6 cubesats (Astra won).

SS propellant costs are under $1M/launch, it was said that counting operations, maybe $2M/launch—that is their cost, of course, not what they would charge. Right now, they could charge $5M for that launch, and be cheaper than smallsat launchers.

So even single smallsats are not out of the range of possible payloads (obviously way cheaper if a rideshare already).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, DDE said:

Jokes aside, they might have better luck selling that tech to produce an SR-72 or any sort of suborbital strike platform than they do to stretch the mass ratio and produce a truly orbital spacecraft.

As I understand the engine is relevant for very high speed cruise missiles or an strike platform. 
But its not stuff we hear much of, its long term and classified. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, magnemoe said:

As I understand the engine is relevant for very high speed cruise missiles or an strike platform. 
But its not stuff we hear much of, its long term and classified. 

Reaction engines is deeply rooted in BAE so I bet their is a lot of progress that just isn’t being shared with the public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...