SmiteZero

You made a database? Couldn\'t you pull the info from the part.cfg?; Would have been easier and it will always be up-to-date.

-10 because it\'s been done before and done better. (And it doesn\'t make much sense except to be an animated, shallow facsimile. *cough* *looks at own sig*) An extra -2 for dumb spoiler.

You know, Tib, as I was typing that I was thinking exactly the same thing. Could get pretty messy. The other option then is just to let people find the listed parts themselves, or the poster to find them and make links. Still a PITA, but the app still does it\'s job and tells you what it\'s made of at least. It\'s a shame there\'s no better way to automate it safely.

Listing the internal part name, the folder name the part is in and the actual part name from it\'s config would probably be enough. As far as the user cares, they don\'t even need to see the internal name, or even the part name - They just need to know where to get it, but listing names would give good feedback. Think you could add an option to auto-zip the craft and all contents into appropriate folders in an archive? That would make it perfect for everyone sharing ships. Anyone know if you can use the Windows archiver from the command line? Pkzip maybe?

Actually, I think I had it first. Not that I\'m aware of anyone else that has it still, so, I\'m not really sure what you mean. : Don\'t hate, bro.

If you\'re pulling the part name from the .craft, may as well look up the part and list other information.

-3 - Shameless self-promotion.

They\'re mostly NovoSilisko\'s Probo parts. I want to know about the yellow tanks.

Thank-you! Utoob users are jerks!

Beaut. Can\'t wait to have these.

It means the colours are non-complimentary in the style you chose. EDIT: Forgot to rate. Don\'t ban me bro! 3/10 - Be it fiery impact crater or the stillness of eternal sleep in the deep cosmos.. Well, the point is that I\'m not sure their fate is worse.

And this is one reason I don\'t model for KSP. ..Or for the glossy mags. *boom ching*

Huh? If the thread was entitled 'Tell us about yourself' then, okay. ...But it\'s not. So, Nice try. Sorry I offended you earlier. You\'re obviously still upset about it.

I still think I must be using the oldest computer here. Single core Athlon 64 (2.21Ghz) with 2gB RAM and 256MB video.

-1 +2 pity points for having to deal with being colourblind.

Hahaha. Madness.

I guess it\'s something to do with the number of chromosomes? Or something?

Of course you\'re correct. Point still stands.

You\'ve never seen Armstrong drop a hammer and feather on the surface of the Moon?? ??? It\'s also a common classroom science demonstration using a vacuum chamber with a penny and feather or something of disparate weights. All objects get accelerated by gravity at the same speed.

But as they said, you\'re not ON Kerbin/Earth, you\'re in space, in a vacuum. Everything falls at the same speed, only the resistance of air matters.

I know it\'s not docking..

...

I hate you. Stop reminding me. I want docking, too.

Well done. Now put a satellite or two in orbit around the Mun for comms and start building a base.

Then you need to fly more efficiently. Launch>Orbit>Transfer>Orbit>Land. Direct ascent is what\'s killing you.