Higgs

Idk about KIS but the idea of KAS as stock is VERY helpful. The sheer fact squad neglected a critical concept of a way to consistently transfer fuel from the mining and processing gear is stunning in its audacity and wholly unacceptable to be brutally blunt. Using KAS makes moving fuels from processing to delivery so much simpler, so again, helpful. Needs to become stock. Also unless something changed the claw be kraken bait

Ya know i think Kerbal Attachment System should be made stock. The fact mining and fuel making is stock but no easy way to transfer fuel from the converter to storage or ship exists stock is a huge lack of completing the triangle.

Kasper check the final line of your final quote. Once hes ready he will share some pictures on twitter.

Duodex let me be as plain as i can be. I want to see this game live and breath a long life of success. If you go to the games official site you see a link to the official forum, this forum. A new player for example would have no clue about this games tweetings or the redditing. I may be old fashioned here but it is my swear it under oath in front of the highest judge in the highest court honest opinion but a forum for a game should be the first stop in the information chain after the primary website dedicated to the game. Not the last stop. I liken this to this analogy: would you duodex expect to get dev notes for say the next update for the next patch for final fantasy xiv here or on its primary site and forum? I expect and see such information there first not a tweet or reddit. I am sorry you do not share my logical viewpoint.

Kinda my whole problem RIC. The thing is, it should be the devs who post them not the players.

I find myself slightly unnerved by todays dev notes. One of the devs may have some pics to share in the near future which is awesome, who wouldnt want a 1.1 sneak peak? Problem is they said it would be over twitter. Like a lot of folks i dont use social media. Why not post here too?

Sounds similar to http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/135020-Spacecraft-explode-over-South-Pole?p=2211767&styleid=1#post2211767 Personally never seen this for myself wonder if its a 1.0.4 thing...

While IR is nice and all it would be nice to have something of the like stock.

Agreed agreed agreed again! On the temp bars i wish there was a menu toggle to kill them forever. Tired of hitting f10 on the first time they show each session

If your in career as it sounds like upgrade the vab, the launch pad for bigger heavier more part count rockets

I'd say with how major an update 1.1 is I fully expect everything to break. On a personal note I hope the stock fairings are replaced by better fairings like the mod procedural fairings, if not, ill still use that mod as its a thousand times better IMHO.

Sorry KasperVld I fail to see the logic in showing featured streamers when they are NOT playing KSP. I think it muddies the water.

Eladdv in all seriousness you keep saying (near as i can gather) they shouldnt make mods stock yet several of porkjets mods have been added as stock. No reason they cant add the superior mod to the buggy version they built. If you want to talk realism, real fairings do not break into tiny chunks. I cant find the video but a nasa launch shows a fairing jettison into 2. The squads fairings break into 20+ pieces. Just saying

heres the thing, squads rendition of procedural fairings is messy, not intuitive and more often than not lamented by the players (from what ive seen) while the mod Procedural Fairings is all around superior. They imho need to dump their fairings for the mod. Just saying

Thanks to EladDv something just hit me. The game as we know has stock fairings when a mod exists called procedural fairings?

I dispute your assumption.

No offense but thats a gaudy and a not so elegant ship in my eyes. Also my rig may implode on that many parts. Id never on record expect a ship or anything to work with out a given mod set. Stop assuming what i think, you will find yourself wrong 99.999999% of the time

Regex show me please where i said anything about being fine with free? Do i use mod part packs? Yup novapunch and proc fairings, but thats beside the point. I would however see if i could duplicate from what i have on hand. As to you 5th please understand if i lack the mods or w/e then its not perfect for me or as i said just now to regex id see if i can duplicate with my stuff on hand.

Regex YOUR personal experience is NOT indicative of 100% of all players in ALL situations. But look at it this way: what if someone designs a ship you find you simply cannot live with out for reasons, but it was designed using DLC parts but you for w/e reason dont know. You dl said ship but it dont wrk. Not having dlc made you not be able to use a ship that would have been the ideal ship for you. Enter your counter here, exit higgs

Not against dlc at all but in this case the idea of almost forcing realism onto players who dont want it is bad. Yes DLC paid or not is in theory optional but almost kinda tries to force itself

No public testing of the ps4 version? No testing by players who know how to play? Welp thats gonna be a huge mistake. I officially believe that will lead to failure. I hope i am wrong but i seriously doubt i am. Refusal to tap a vast and knowledgeable resource often leads to mistakes that lead to failure. Again hope i am wrong but again doubt i am

If ur talking about the station above your post the panels look stock with large stock radiators

QFT! i think mp is an unneeded complication. Especially when you look at disparate systems and how high part counts bog stuff down

The glitchy as all funky service bays.

Never really thought about to be honest. But having tripped over this thread and thinking on it, i have to agree more icons are needed