Jump to content

kerbiloid

Members
  • Posts

    18,725
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by kerbiloid

  1. They wrote some notes. The Peak Weak (Club) Papers
  2. Skyrim is full of Earls. The Earl Next Door Cookie
  3. Banned because it's a hockey mask.
  4. I guess, he was writing them from a home theater for children, with sweater on the head and a stool as the rear leg.
  5. The Apollo-13 remake should be played by Nicolas Cage, Bruce Willis, and Erik Roberts.
  6. Banned by ewoks. P.S. Sorry for the overkill.
  7. Banned for measuring people with a newpagian ruler. (ninja'd)
  8. Banned for not being part of the latte people.
  9. The board computer has been spammed with forum notificatios, and the ship crashes into asteroid. Several crewhumans survived.
  10. There was a site, can recall its URL, something "http://isdelphidead". It was a blank page with "Is delphi dead?" "No."
  11. There are a lot of superpeople with such superpower.
  12. I was unaware, but this changes nothing on the SRB topic. (I don't follow the hype about the space tourists.) SpaceX rockets have nothing to do about combat missiles. Recon sat launches as maximum. Same recon sats can be launched by SRB rockets like usually.
  13. The Delft University campus? Thrown into sea. For better drama. Said @JoeSchmuckatelli, looking at mirror. Does Monaco have?
  14. The question is not in money. The question is in the working factory. The ICBM/SLBM factory must run without a pause, It needs something to manufacture, something to let the personnel keep up their skills, the equipment be cared and kept always intact. Money don't play much role here. Because if tomorrow, say, "NK" builds a thousand of primitive rockets, no SpaceX can provide ICBM in a year. The last ICBM cryorockets were Titan I and R-9. So, whatever exists as peace time "contracts", the military needs will override any of them at any moment.
  15. Idk. I'm just sure that sky may fall on ground, but the combat rockets will have higher priority than civil ones. Also I believe that no "heavy" lunar base will be built until it gets economically reasonable, which can happen only after fusion reactors appear. So, whatever is better, the lunar base will get on table by 2050s or so, and nobody will force it. Before that only small temporary geological outposts can happen, and that's what SLS can provide as well.
×
×
  • Create New...