minepagan
-
Posts
858 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by minepagan
-
@CobaltWolf I found the problem, it wasn't a mod compatibility or anything - in the CFG, on the line where it defined the oxidizer, there was a / in front of RESOURCE. -
@CobaltWolfthere seems to be a problem with the short 1.875m tank for the Inon upper stage system - it only has Liquid Fuel (180 units). Anyone else having this problem? To be safe I deleted BDB and re downloaded, but the problem persists. Edit: I belive it is the Inon 400 but I am not certain.
-
Yeah it's especially because it has a 'new' mods section, which is featured on its front page, so anyone going there would see it
-
@Tokamakany chance you can upload this to Spacedock? I feel like you'd get a lot of much deserved attention, and (I've heard) it is more, erm, streanlined than using Github.
-
BDB has apollo-style launch clamps in the roadmap
-
You can't throttle them normally, they just have a 'thrust curve' where they start at one thrust and gradually change to another, lower thrust, so their TWR does not change as much.
-
For parachute sliders, just set it to predeploy at 0.42 ATM - that always works, unless you come in wayyyy to steep.
-
I'd rather have the Gemini shuttle or paraglider...
-
Hey guys, I found a good thread for 1.2! BTW this was an old April fools joke NOT actually info on the real 1.2
-
Could you just resize a Jumbo tank, in the interim?
-
*Perfectionism warning* in ETS didn't the S1C have a tank that looked more like a stretched SIVB?
-
And I will just sit here in the pool of my own saliva....did I say that out loud?
-
Could we get one that has 3 ports, but 1 faces out? And one like that for 4 ports?
-
Aww man! I broke blender twice for nothing!
-
Oh I'm going to as well....I'm calling dibs on the Apollo Block III, III+, and IV
-
Yeah, and then you could add the TMA version with 3 crew capacity somewhere along the line.
-
I thought about that - but any way that I thought of meant making using it with the OM was under-powered, like increasing weight, cost, ect.
-
@Beale, since you are redoing the Soyuz parts now seems like the perfect time: In my career playthroughs, I've noticed that the Soyuz DM/Zond capsule is really, really overpowered. It's smaller than the MK1 command pod, only slightly heavier, yet has a 2 kerbal capacity and a built-in heatshield. To make it balanced, it really needs to have a way of having the OM needed, and not just be for show. How about removing the hatch, or making the hatch be on top like the real soyuz/zond? That way you can still use it as a zond, but you can't use docking ports or anything.
-
I'd agree, possibly some white accents on the SM and some hazard stripes/decals all around?
- 22,678 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- totm march 2020
- mod
- (and 2 more)
-
@CobaltWolfHere's a good resource for pretty much any rocket ever: http://andegraf.com/rockets/saturn.htm also, here he has some more pics of 3D models: http://andegraf.com/f501.htm
-
It does, for gameplay balance reasons. However...in the 3d model there are seats for 6. So, I move that @CobaltWolf make the MOL lab be as efficient as the stock lab with 2 crew, and include a patch to give the stock lab access to all 6 seats.
-
Yes, but the stock lab also has seats for 6 kerbals....:-)
-
This thread over the past couple of days:
-
Yes I am Problem is, I don't have Realchute, and if I uninstall Realchute Lite in FAR then my parachutes don't work normally. Like, at all.
