Jump to content

ThirdOfSeven

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    94

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

56 Excellent

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • About me
    Addicted To Mods
  • Location
    R&D Building
  • Interests
    Programming, Computers, Network, Facts about Universe

Recent Profile Visitors

4,495 profile views
  1. ThirdOfSeven
    Currently testing it in 1.6.1 with tons of mods (including unofficial FAR build and GPP). Game didn't crash yet, they inflate, deflate, produce lift, they fly somewhere slowly. I didn't try this mod before today, maybe something is missing, but for me it looks working perfectly.
  2. ThirdOfSeven
    So it seems not all retractable parts got this improvement about impact resistance when retracted, but only 5 types of solar panels? Is it only in part.cfg but also part modules don't support them?
  3. ThirdOfSeven
    When it is falling from space, bottom side is pointing prograde (direction of speed vector), which is pointing to ground. Ship itself will point retrograde (with its pointy end). Nevermind, it doesn't flip anymore after clean reinstall.
  4. ThirdOfSeven
    It seems to me like Mk1 Pod, despite previous information on "not changing its properties too much" is now flipping in atmosphere (with no SAS) to fly with pointy side down, while it should keep its orientation with thick bottom side to prograde. Is it intended? Anybody else can observe this?
  5. ThirdOfSeven
    No, actually they sink really well, and I need tons of blisters strapped to stop them. Now parts in KSP have their own "buoyancy" field, not sure which value they have by default and I don't think they are related to part scale, that's why. I'm trying to make TweakScale patch to scale it as well to check if it will help.
  6. ThirdOfSeven
    Oh, now it is clear it is x, y, z scale multipliers and some static "weight" added is last value. Anyway, seems buoyancy is not adjusted by this mod
  7. ThirdOfSeven
    I can't find link to source code for plugins anywhere to check (shouldn't it be available, btw?). What MODULE { name = FSResizer specificMass = 5, 5, 0.0, 0.5 /// <--- these specificCost = 472.3465, 605.744, 0.0, 450.0 size = 1 sizeOnly = true } these values mean? Why will any ship with upscaled parts instantly sink? I suspect it is due to mass growing but not buoyancy. Maybe buoyancy parameter should be adjusted on resize too (like it is done by TweakScale)?
  8. ThirdOfSeven
    Hi there. I have two related problems here: [LOG 11:18:05.418] ADDON BINDER: Create binding redirect: BDArmory, Version=1.2.0.1047, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null => BDArmory, Version=1.2.2.2, Cult ure=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null [ERR 11:18:05.419] AssemblyLoader: Exception loading 'AntiSubmarineWeapon': System.Reflection.ReflectionTypeLoadException: The classes in the module cannot be loaded. at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.Reflection.Assembly:GetTypes (bool) at System.Reflection.Assembly.GetTypes () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at AssemblyLoader.LoadAssemblies () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 Additional information about this exception: System.TypeLoadException: Could not load type 'AntiSubmarineWeapon.ModuleAntiSubmarineWeapon' from assembly 'AntiSubmarineWeapon, Version=0.6.5.2, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null'. This happens with latest BDA from SpaceDock at 1.4.5. I know it may be not supported and wanted to rebuild/fix it, but seems like (second problem) Link to source code in starter post and on SpaceDock is broken.
  9. ThirdOfSeven
    I don't really get any error when I try to launch from KK, it just switch to load flight scene but immediatelly quits it and goes back to KSC without launching anything like you described.
  10. AleXX started following ThirdOfSeven
  11. ThirdOfSeven
    Somebody else see this: It seems to me like all the reentry effects are now coming from stuff under fairings, but not from fairing itself. Is it just me or everybody? Most noticeable on GDLV3 stock vessel:
  12. ThirdOfSeven
    Yes, if we go for old KSP EULA, then it has scary things too (but...): But according to https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ14.pdf, I'm not a layer, but it seems to me modifications should not fall to "derivative work" category at all (until you make your own altered distribution of KSP with intent to distribute it, probably). It should bother me more after translating some material or filming gameplay than modders, since it is more likely a derivative work. So new T2 EULA is rights-greedy for sure, and I'm wrong talking about their similarity, since they don't care and seize rights for everything falling under "User-created conteint" as it seems to me now.
  13. ThirdOfSeven
    Absolutely agree, lack of communication is the evil. That true also. But it is also fact that, even if paid, Squad or Take Two has same zero support/maintenance responsibility towards anyone, as we can see. Even if you get donations, you are also free from any further obligations, as listed in almost any license. In both cases it is willingness to continue you work for whatever reason, will it be material profit or spiritual motivation. Of course volunteered work is honorable and should get more attention and must be protected, but I don't see positive or negative movements in this field with new EULA and ToS. Good point. Here I made mistake. So the last sentence in the above text (before quote) is not correct anymore.
  14. ThirdOfSeven
    I'll quote "older" ToS we had, which, literally, allows doing same things: And new... Does it seem different?
  15. ThirdOfSeven
    Reading what is happening here, I don't even know, what is worse today: new ToS/EULA or the reaction of community. On one hand we have changes in terms for KSP, on other hand we have community changing their licensing/hosting/stopping doing anything. Are they different from T2 now? Doesn't look so. They harm their "customers" in same way. Still wish to see something official to calm down everybody, but nope.
  16. ThirdOfSeven
    We at least wanna hear this from somebody working for Squad or Take Two. Also we wanna see who to ask (and have answers before Sun lifetime isn't gone) if we have any particular questions related to their IP and their use. Some FAQ or guidelines about what is permitted to do (or even encouraged to do). We are just people who wanna minimize any risk to get channel strike, content removed, account banned for something listed in EULA or ToS. We don't know if somebody from staff will take some actions on their will without anybody knowing (like they don't know about EULA as you say...). Things like this were happening in the past with other companies (I will not post names).
×
×
  • Create New...