Cheesecake
Members-
Posts
2,091 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
846 ExcellentProfile Information
-
About me
Rocketry Enthusiast
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
https://github.com/snjo/firespitter/releases Latest release is for 1.11 but should work with 1.12. You only need the plugin inside the download.
-
The craftfiles may be outdated and therefore no longer work. I can't test that right now. But it's not true that parts are missing. I played with Raidernick's mods for a very long time and everything you need is there. You can build everything that is specified. Maybe you can specify here what exactly is missing.
-
I already wrote this to @VITAS yesterday, but now here too: With another PC and Firefox 131.00 the access works. So I have downgraded Firefox to 131.00 on my PC. Including a new Firefox profile. That worked. The page could be called up. I then updated to 132.00 again. After that, the page could no longer be opened. However, all other pages can be called up with 132.00 without any problems. So there is definitely a problem in the Spacedock - Firefox 132.00 constellation.
- 2,151 replies
-
- totm july 2019
- spacedock
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Didn`t work for me.
- 2,151 replies
-
- totm july 2019
- spacedock
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
However, the error still exists. I use Firefox 132.0, like @HebaruSan.
- 2,151 replies
-
- totm july 2019
- spacedock
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hm, strange. I can call up Spacedock with Edge, it loads briefly with Firefox and then nothing is displayed. Cache and temp files deleted, but still not working. No error is displayed either. Just a white page. Edit: Now I have the following message: in english probably (translated): The Firefox website says that it may be a certificate error of the website.
- 2,151 replies
-
- totm july 2019
- spacedock
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Is Spacedock down?
- 2,151 replies
-
- totm july 2019
- spacedock
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
[WIP] Boring Crew Services - Stockalike Starliner Mod
Cheesecake replied to DylanSemrau's topic in KSP1 Mod Development
It works.- 472 replies
-
[1.7, 1.8, 1.9] Kerbalized SpaceX BETA
Cheesecake replied to linuxgurugamer's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
That`s how the real nose cap works. It opens only ~90 degrees, not 180. I also recommend another, more up-to-date mod for SpaceX-parts: -
[1.12.5] Starship Expansion Project - SEP | v2.2.0 (June, 23rd, 2024)
Cheesecake replied to Kari's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
For HLS: https://spacedock.info/mod/3245/HLS project -
Since the Kunlun comes with CryoEngines Extension, this should be adapted rather than the other way around. But the Etna has a different role than the Kunlun. The Kunlun is intended more for a conventional rocket, as it produces quite a lot of thrust at a low weight. The first rocket stage is dropped relatively early here. Therefore, the Isp in the atmo is higher here than with the Etna and the T/W ratio is also much better. A relatively powerful upper stage is also required here to get the payload into orbit. The Etna is used more like the Delta IV or Ariana 5/6 and has a rather poor T/W ratio. In most cases, boosters are required to support the launch. However, it should run as long as possible, while the upper stages are usually not as powerful. The first stage then brings the payload into orbit almost on its own, or at least to a very high orbit, where the weaker upper stage (as mentioned above), which then usually has a higher ISP and burn time, then has enough time to bring the payload to the desired orbit. For comparison: Delta IV Thrust of the first stage: 3140kn Burn time: 245s Thrust of the second stage: 110kn Isp: 462 Burn time: 850-1125s Falcon 9:Thrust of the first stage: 7600kn Burn time: 162s Thrust of the second stage: 934kn Isp: 348 Burn time: 397s Source: Wikipedia