rudi1291
Members-
Posts
276 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by rudi1291
-
That thing looks so weird flying
-
So a guesstimate of When in 2020 KSP will come out
rudi1291 replied to Redneck's topic in Prelaunch KSP2 Discussion
If the 'pre-alpha' footage is what they have now, then spring 2020 seems unlikely. -
Loosely inspired by this i´ve built an catapult launched electric airplane. Launch works surprisingly well. Now to get it safely back down without landing gear...
-
Won´t they need the SuperHeavy to archieve orbit with enough fuel to land?
-
Kerbal Space Program Update 1.5 Grand Discussion thread
rudi1291 replied to UomoCapra's topic in KSP1 Discussion
Not sure if it was mentioned before... but whats with the lighting in the menu scene? It looks like there are two light sources- 388 replies
-
- kerbal space program
- update 1.5
- (and 3 more)
-
"Do you trust this computer?" Documentary ft. Elon Musk
rudi1291 replied to DAL59's topic in Science & Spaceflight
I don´t see a conspiracy. I see a bunch of people who invented something, which they don´t understand, so they are concerned about it. Is that concern justified? -
Interesting indeed...
-
Joining the dots... The Mission System
rudi1291 commented on TriggerAu's article in Developer Articles
Could´ve used that a couple years ago when i learned all about state machines at university This is a great example. Also makes the mission builder a lot more versatile The more i play with it the more i like it -
My security systems tell me that KSP Install has a Trojan onboard.
rudi1291 replied to Sirad's topic in KSP1 Discussion
Windows Defender (built in Win10) tells me the same. Seems like false positive. The file in question is the Assembly-CSharp.dll -
My thoughts on the Mission Builder and Making History
rudi1291 replied to Whirligig Girl's topic in Making History Discussion
I am a bit disappointed by the mission builder. I expected issues, just like every release of KSP had some issues. But not that many, and some of them seem like really obvious oversights. That said, i still expect to have some fun with it. It just could have been so much better Edit: Just tried to do the first stock mission. Game crashed, so far twice. Of to a good start!- 38 replies
-
- 1
-
- mission builder
- making history
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Yesterday i was testing a new plane i´ve built, when i noticed something odd... So i changed the design a bit to exploit make good use of it Here it is on KerbalX: https://kerbalx.com/rudi1291/Speeding-Tank Should i even report it is a bug? This is great, like the ladder bug How this works:
-
Pretty shapes
-
Kerbal Space Program update 1.4 Grand Discussion thread.
rudi1291 replied to UomoCapra's topic in KSP1 Discussion
So, i just found this on the PAW of parachutes: Anyone know what "Canopy Max Rotation Rate" does? It can be set between 60 and 720, but i couldn´t figure out what it does... -
Also one of my favorites from 1.4. This, and the fast switching between SPH/VAB Thanks for bringing that to the base game
-
The only "problem" i´ve found with blocking KSP from accessing the internet is that redshell shows a warning about it in the log.
-
Take Two is not active under the EU-US Privacy Shield, so they probably don´t care about it.
-
Kerbal Space Program update 1.4 Grand Discussion thread.
rudi1291 replied to UomoCapra's topic in KSP1 Discussion
What a pleasant surprise this morning Edit: So far i really like it. Some nice new features. Even the jet engine sounds (Yes, i really think they are pretty good) -
Just for the difference in cost you could probably hire an army of engineers to engineer that payload into two! SLS is just an excuse to spend money. Taxpayer money, which they would have no matter what (as long as they dont cancel SLS), and spending that is better than just sitting on it
-
From the article: " things like un-safed COPVs (composite overwrapped pressure vessels) at flight pressure could have made it a ticking time bomb and hazard to navigation and marine life" Surely blowing it up with lots of other explosive stuff is better
-
Just rewatched the stream. I said it already yesterday, but again: This launch was amazing! A bit sad that the center core didn´t make it, but it was a test, if there´s a problem its better to find it now rather than later. And to be honest, i expected more/bigger problems. Still amazed that the booster seperation worked as well as it did!
-
Wow! Amazing! The image of two landed boosters will make a nice wallpaper! Not sure i can get sleep tonight...
-
T-20 getting closer
-
OCISLY is something like ~350km downrange to catch the falling core... the fairing probably won´t fall that much further downrange.