rudi1291

Thanks for sharing the answers.

That thing looks so weird flying

If the 'pre-alpha' footage is what they have now, then spring 2020 seems unlikely.

Loosely inspired by this i´ve built an catapult launched electric airplane. Launch works surprisingly well. Now to get it safely back down without landing gear...

Won´t they need the SuperHeavy to archieve orbit with enough fuel to land?

Keyframe based editor? Thats nice and allows for great flexibility... Does this only work on the new robotic parts or also on existing parts with animations/actions?

Are engines bound to these axis groups or are they hard coded? Is it possible to rebind engines to another axis group than 'main throttle'?

Not sure if it was mentioned before... but whats with the lighting in the menu scene? It looks like there are two light sources

I don´t see a conspiracy. I see a bunch of people who invented something, which they don´t understand, so they are concerned about it. Is that concern justified?

Interesting indeed...

Could´ve used that a couple years ago when i learned all about state machines at university This is a great example. Also makes the mission builder a lot more versatile The more i play with it the more i like it

Windows Defender (built in Win10) tells me the same. Seems like false positive. The file in question is the Assembly-CSharp.dll

I am a bit disappointed by the mission builder. I expected issues, just like every release of KSP had some issues. But not that many, and some of them seem like really obvious oversights. That said, i still expect to have some fun with it. It just could have been so much better Edit: Just tried to do the first stock mission. Game crashed, so far twice. Of to a good start!

Yesterday i was testing a new plane i´ve built, when i noticed something odd... So i changed the design a bit to exploit make good use of it Here it is on KerbalX: https://kerbalx.com/rudi1291/Speeding-Tank Should i even report it is a bug? This is great, like the ladder bug How this works:

Pretty shapes

So, i just found this on the PAW of parachutes: Anyone know what "Canopy Max Rotation Rate" does? It can be set between 60 and 720, but i couldn´t figure out what it does...

Every major release since (and including) 1.0 required at least one hotfix. 1.4.1 has already been announced, but since thats required for MH and needs to be released at the same time anyway, its questionable whether that will have many bugfixes. A 1.4.2 is very likely, but i don´t think its necessary because Take Two wanted 1.4 released before the end of their fiscal year (although that might have played a role). And to be honest, compared to some other releases, 1.4 doesn´t feel that bad to me

Also one of my favorites from 1.4. This, and the fast switching between SPH/VAB Thanks for bringing that to the base game

The only "problem" i´ve found with blocking KSP from accessing the internet is that redshell shows a warning about it in the log.

Take Two is not active under the EU-US Privacy Shield, so they probably don´t care about it.

What a pleasant surprise this morning Edit: So far i really like it. Some nice new features. Even the jet engine sounds (Yes, i really think they are pretty good)

The release notes mention a particle system upgrade. And when 1.4 was first announced, there was speculation, that they might use it for engine plumes. Maybe thats that in effect?

Just for the difference in cost you could probably hire an army of engineers to engineer that payload into two! SLS is just an excuse to spend money. Taxpayer money, which they would have no matter what (as long as they dont cancel SLS), and spending that is better than just sitting on it

From the article: " things like un-safed COPVs (composite overwrapped pressure vessels) at flight pressure could have made it a ticking time bomb and hazard to navigation and marine life" Surely blowing it up with lots of other explosive stuff is better

Just rewatched the stream. I said it already yesterday, but again: This launch was amazing! A bit sad that the center core didn´t make it, but it was a test, if there´s a problem its better to find it now rather than later. And to be honest, i expected more/bigger problems. Still amazed that the booster seperation worked as well as it did!