Jump to content

legoclone09

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,335

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by legoclone09

  1. legoclone09
    Tank mass doesn't bother me too much, big ones are usually on heavy lifters. I don't think a rebalance is needed then.
  2. legoclone09
    So we need to balance out 2.5m, this should be based off of the one with the best mass ratio. Since it is better it makes more sense because of advancing technology. The Oscar-B does need a nerf, though. Maybe it can be the same as 1.25m since it is in the same tech cost as 1.25m in ETT.
  3. legoclone09
    I drew this on my iPad a few minutes ago, I used this as a reference.
  4. legoclone09
    It's well worth the outrageous $0.00 price tag. It's far better than Windows.
  5. legoclone09
    Never mind! It works now!
  6. legoclone09
    Never mind that. Now my cat lives in Antarctica.
  7. legoclone09
    Right, I think tanks should be left as-is then. I am pretty sure about stock tanks being balanced. So thend dry mass is for every 100 units of LF+O it i 0.0625 tons of dry tankage, I think this is stock's balance (taking data from the 1.25m tanks).
  8. legoclone09
    Well Damned Robotics was remaned into Infernal Robotics I hink, or it at least has the same features. With what FungusForge said we would need a picture. Here's the camera one: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/12300-019-multiversal-mechatronics-fixed-camera-13/ Infernal Robotics: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/104535-105-magic-smoke-industries-infernal-robotics-0214/
  9. legoclone09
    I agree about dry mass. I think the tanks should all start at 15%, but in structural nodes there are upgrade techs (not part dupes!) that reduce dry mass to a low of 2.5% in a >1000 Science node. @inigma SRBs should be left as-is, only with tech tree changes. The cost so little it's not worth changing them except for amount of fuel which should be a flat 90%. Another problem is how do we calculate volume of all fuel tanks? It would take a long time to open the .mu files to do so, maybe there is a formula we can use with some unused stuff in stock. I might PM HarvestR about that.
  10. legoclone09
    Yeah, I don't like the fact he purposely makes it seem like a full sample, but still if people don't know basic things it's sad.
  11. legoclone09
    Yeah, that site seems really BS.
  12. legoclone09
    There's this segemnt on a show on Fox that has a person interview random American citizens and ask them basic questions. It's called Watter's World if you want to google it. The questions are things like when America was fist discovered, or who the first president was. I've seen it answered that the first preesident was Abraham Lincoln and America was discovered in the 1900s. It's worse considering these people are in college. Most of this was made obsolete, but this thread is kind of derailing.
  13. legoclone09
    Thing explainer says 'Thing' a lot. well, it is called THING explainer.
  14. legoclone09
    No, no, no. The Earth is a toroid, not a flat disk. That's why the ROUND-8 looks like that.
  15. legoclone09
    Haha! That last picture was hilarious. I do love this, can't wait for more!
  16. legoclone09
    Great job! Love it, can't wait for more.
  17. legoclone09
    Yeah, but if it is true (which it won't be, probably), we always have Elon Musk and/or NASA.
  18. legoclone09
    I'm on vacation but working on a logo for this. It'll be terrible though. Probably. EDIT: I'm scrapping that, I can make a mockup of how the early career would balance out in this with ETT since you start with 1.25m and 0.625m parts. Maybe a more linear area at first with sounding rockets and other beginning stuff and then it fleshes out? Like a small subtree in the bottom corner area that has the final area with that go to the start node on ETT. EDIT 2: I can also make a rescale recommended mod area with mm configs to balance out. I will make a standard for rescales, that should be up soon^tm
  19. legoclone09
    Ok, sounds good! Maybe we can get Roverdude's subs in here, we likely will. Also a dock for the sub would be nice, with a KAS line and some anchors to connect to land. It would have to float and be modular with a anchor hub. I might make a simple model for that. Like a square that floats.
  20. legoclone09
    Dry mass could be 1/10th of the fuel in the tank. Also @inigma I have been using ETT lately, I like it way more than SETI, especially with tons of mods.
  21. legoclone09
    Ah, ok. Is it because it is too hard to do or not efficient? I feel like you have said something about that quite a few pages ago. EDIT Will there be a LFO TKS tank? That would be great for various 1.875m ships *looks at Apollo CSM diagrams and Ven's Poodle Tweakscaled*
  22. legoclone09
    Awesome job on that Beale! Loving the new remodels, maybe we can see some IVAs soon?
  23. legoclone09
    Are there any other plans for the mod? You haven't added anything in a while.
  24. legoclone09
    Yeah, also I like KAX more, Firespittsr parts just look ugly to me. It's just personal preference though.
  25. legoclone09
    On the 22nd day of Kristmas my Kerbal gave to me: 22 TR-18s, 21 Not-Rockomax Micronodes, 20 Mun landings, 19 rocket-powered rovers, 18 "borrowed" fuel tanks, 17 trips to Eve, 16 massive mods, 15 Manley videos, 14 reaction wheels, 13 broken songs, 12 SSTOs, this video, 10 blueprints, 9 replicas, 8 Kraken reports, 7 Drill-O-Matics, 6 Science Jr's, FIIIIVE PAAAARRAAAAACHUUUUUUTTES!!! 4 solar panels, 3 hitchhiker pods, 2 SRBs and A COPY OF K S P ! ! ! ! !
×
×
  • Create New...