Jump to content

SpaceplaneAddict

Members
  • Posts

    2,272
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SpaceplaneAddict

  1. Looks like I messed up my point about Spaceplanes. Lock http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/129687-spaceplanes-need-variety/#comment-2358224 that for me, please?
  2. *psst* taking about those spaceplanes. Ta know, things that wing it into orbit? Ha, those. Yeesh, lemme go nab a moderator, my spear seems to have split.
  3. As I write this, KSP 1.1 with Unity 5 is still in development, while our current version, KSP 1.0.5, is still running Unity 4. Ciao!
  4. In order to land on an atmospheric body, I only have two options. Standard Pod, shield and chutes. Or a spaceplane
  5. Ok, ok, so maybe I wasn't clear. I believe rockets themselves, yeah, do need attention. As much as SPACEplanes. Yeesh, I'm not talking about atmospheric full time flight, calm down! I could give a damn about planes, but they have enough. There's the one gap in my opinion that says, hey, look at me! Turn your head, and whaddya know, that space plane stuff sure likes , ahem, space rated! Mainly engines... Like more dual cycle ones, or whiplash alternatives I almost regret making this thread. Almost. Codfled? Surprised here. Weren't they actually, ahem, being beaten up with the nerd hammer the past few updates?
  6. Oh mah gawd. Dem edits doh. Dayumn. And I would register my support, but I don't have FaceBook. Have my official support from the KSPForums instead!
  7. I feel accomplished. God-dang it Jeb! You just HAAAAF to get caught by a Kenlie evaluating the action of murder
  8. @Jakalth, I think I speak for I, Sanic, Dres, and everyone who has completed the Dres Awareness challenge, when I say, damn valiant effort. That, was probably one of the saddest ends to a mission ever. It was beautiful, know that the work you DID do, was awesome, and that appearently the Kraken hates Dres. You fought the Kraken, amazing effort.
  9. You've qulified with a valiant effort, I believe Dres approves. However, I may make a special reprieve in your case, due to all of that effort being lost. PM me if your interested. Welcome, Jakalth, to the Dres Supporter list!
  10. All I want it for is Delta-V readouts and the maneuver plotter, 'cause I don't trust KER, and am stupid about which way to burn to do various things
  11. Two parts for the same performance of one part! Alright, count me in...! No, seriously, The Nuke sucks enough now, why limit more of our currently decent designs? Not to mention drag induced by the shield, making it impossible for my Blade, as an example, to make orbit with the Delta-V it needs. What the nuke needs, is absolutely nothing. It's literaly perfect right where it is, no need to change it, IMO, Gameplay over (minor) realism anyday
  12. But how, you say? Let's figure some out! Good suggestions will be consolidated into the OP. Suggestions: Larger alternatives to the RAPIER, and Whiplash Radial heat tiles that can blend to the craft form Procedural WingS What else?
  13. All of this is great. Voted for option 2, but honestly, neither rockets or planes need most now, a certai hybrid of the two, AHEM, gmthe spaceplane, is slightly and extremely lonely, such as some variety in the engines.. Nevermind, I'll just make a thread for spaceplanes.
  14. Should there be a bonus for landing somewhere, depending where? Also, can we take the tanks with us? Pull them along until they dry?
  15. Just putting it out here, I really hate Tylo right now...

  16. Up your nose! Why can't I find a good LF/O mix balance for a Nuke/RAPIER combo?
  17. Drop tanks and an SSTO, hmmm Also, 12 years?ge the challenge is hard enugh, maybe put that on a "Frenzy" level?
×
×
  • Create New...