Jump to content

Spaceception

Members
  • Posts

    3,221
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Spaceception

  1. Oh, okay, no problem. Add-ons will probably sort itself out in a few days anyway from everyone posting in it.
  2. So uh, (Stupid mobile) I've accidentally marked both addon releases and space/sci as read, the s/s threads was a few weeks ago, is there any way to change that back?
  3. So uh, I need to land it again tomorrow, since I undershot it, and ended up in the ocean.
  4. I heard 20th century fox is already looking at it
  5. Alright guys, getting ready for landing at least one module on Fust, wish me luck!
  6. Well, maybe we'll get an explanation later on, it could be a mixture of government and private corporations based in Kenya, hence the name.
  7. Preeeeeety The visuals are really nice, and the clouds make for very nice screenshots I also like the visuals you gave to the Mun, great job! I had to lower graphics though, so it wouldn't lag too much, I also disabled god rays.
  8. I'm not on KSP yet, and I haven't gotten around to downloading this But an Extrasolar patch would be cool when you get the time, I got the gist that this could work with lower end computers.
  9. Will this work with Extrasolar (Not Constellations) by @AndrewDrawsPrettyPictures? The reason I ask is because my laptop is fine for part packs, and the like, but it's laggy for the finer details, so scatterer and EVE wouldn't work for me.
  10. I don't know, I saw a thread for some pseudoscience thread about a free energy engine on the front page and decided to take a look, but the latest post was from last year, did something break? I'm on mobile by the way.
  11. How would you calculate it for a torus? Or would just calculating it for a sphere be a good ballpark?
  12. @Bill Phil that's what I got too, I thought I screwed something up with it, cause that's only 588 km/s, how do you think Robert Forward got close to the speed of light? Showerthought, since the gravity field of the object would be many times greater than earth, maybe it would accelerate you a fair way before you enter the ring, the acceleration of it vastly increasing the closer you get before putting you out the other end, and throwing you away, how fast would you get then? Would it be significant?
  13. Okay, okay, I know what you're thinking, spaceception, that idea is batcrap crazy, and to you I say, no I'm not, Robert Forward is! http://spaceflighthistory.blogspot.com/2015/06/pluto-doorway-to-stars-1962.html?m=1 His idea for why Pluto was so wierd, was that it was a gift from an alien race, what was that gift? A giant ring about the size of mercury with 6x the mass of Earth made from neutron star matter. He proposed that it could accelerate a spacecraft to near the speed of light by passing through the ring in around a minute, with the acceleration of 1000 Earth gravities. And it wouldn't turn you into gourmet jelly because the spinning ring would act uniformly on all the atoms in your body, so you'd just get catapulted to another star really quickly. The problem is, I tried to see exactly how fast you could get, but I don't think I found the right equation (or plugged the right numbers in) because the final speed is way below the speed of light, can anyone else help?
  14. Thanks! Also look at his Twitter, it looks like some stuff is moving forward.
  15. Maybe it could be revived, one of the forum users made an aerospace company for cubesats, I forgot his forum name, but it's Cloud aero, and there's a forum here in the loungr I believe.
  16. Go up near the top to freddinos post, there's another forum link there
  17. For me, (At least in atmo) the Pluto engine only worked after it was throttled up for a little bit, after that, turn on the reactor added into the engine, and it should work. I'm on my phone right now, so I can't check myself
×
×
  • Create New...