Of course not! It might get the SLS mothballed.
EDIT: Reading through the comments raised an excellent point.
:I think the vast majority of people who don't watch every hearing and read through all the minutia every day don't realize what a tightrope Charles Bolden walks on SLS.
He's been ordered by Congress to build SLS, and he's continually accused by Congress (and SLS fans) of slow-walking the program. Congress holds the purse strings, and if Bolden can't convince them he's doing his utmost to make sure SLS is built, they cut his programs.
If SLS doesn't succeed, Congress won't say, "Ya know, we shoved this rocket down NASA's throat, so it's not really their fault; it's ours." Nope. If SLS fails, Congress gets to blame the Administrator, his staff, the President, his political party, and most of all, the agency. Most importantly, Congress has been threatening to take over the appointment of the agency's officers. I presume that would mean they could choose an administrator who favors their particular programs.
So, knowing all of this, Charlie Bolden cheers loudly for SLS every chance he gets. And having seen a little bit of what's going on, , I would absolutely do the same, for the Agency's sake."