Benjamin Kerman

The first one is wrapped in a KERBALCHANGELOG node, but when it's saved, the outer node is removed.

I have some code below that loads cfg files, reads them, and then sets one value inside. private void LoadChangelogs() { Debug.Log("[KCL] Loading changelogs..."); ConfigNode[] changelogNodes = GameDatabase.Instance.GetConfigNodes("KERBALCHANGELOG"); //searches for any instances of files with a changelog node UrlDir.UrlConfig[] cfgDirs = GameDatabase.Instance.GetConfigs("KERBALCHANGELOG"); bool firstVersionNumber = true; foreach (UrlDir.UrlConfig cfgDir in cfgDirs)//loops through all of the files found { bool show = true; ConfigNode cln = cfgDir.config; cln.TryGetValue("showChangelog", ref show); if (!show) { continue; } string mod = cln.GetValue("modName"); string modChangelog = ""; List<string> version = new List<string>(); foreach(ConfigNode vn in cln.GetNodes("VERSION"))//adds version nodes to the string { if(!firstVersionNumber) { modChangelog += "\n"; } firstVersionNumber = false; version.Add(vn.GetValue("version")); modChangelog += (vn.GetValue("version") + ":\n"); foreach(string change in vn.GetValues("change")) { modChangelog += ("* " + change + "\n"); } } modChangelogs.Add(new Tuple<string, string, string>(mod, modChangelog, HighestVersion(version))); if (!cln.SetValue("showChangelog", false)) { Debug.Log("[KCL] Unable to set value 'showChangelog'."); } Debug.Log($"[KCL] {cfgDir.parent.fullPath}"); //Returns something like "C:/Users/BenjaminK/Desktop/KSP/1.5.1/GameData/CoolMod/Coolmodchangelog.cfg" cfgDir.config.Save(cfgDir.parent.fullPath); //Saves the file with the one field edited firstVersionNumber = true; } changesLoaded = true; } Unfortunately, this changes a nicely formatted changelog like the one described here into this. Any suggestions as to what I can do to fix this?

It should be distributed like ModuleManager, but I haven't implemented any versioning or multiple .dll restrictions yet. The .dll is self contained, so it can be open in the main folder as well, like Module Manager, but it would probably be better to have it in it's own folder for licence packaging and the like. Sure thing. I'll have that in the next release.

Man that's a 0/10 for me, you must be new

jumping joyously. Evan P. Shmirtd, the __________________ man to walk the Earth.

9/10 pretty cool element there and you spelt it right I think

banned for having furry feet

Teenagers

πινγκ

Maybe try checking out some of the code of Kerbal Crash System? It does part deformation and probably model changing as well. EDIT: Reading through the code, it looks like Enzo used https://github.com/EnzoMeertens/KerbalKrashSystem/blob/master/Source/KerbalKrashSystem/KerbalKrashSystem/KerbalKrashSystem.cs#L401 to change the shape of the part, and a similar function (called a couple lines above) to change the collider.

Banned for not knowing those complicated words

I think I saw another thread about this, so I'll pull a parrot and repeat what I saw there Did you check the box that said something along the lines of 'install .NET frameworks>3.5'?

It seems unlikely to me that SQUAD would endorse SpaceDock without ensuring that SpaceDock is never going to do down as long as KSP is around and active (by providing funding and/or computer parts) because if you're going to have a mod hosting site, you're going to have a mod hosting site that is always up and fast, because otherwise it becomes another problem that they have to deal with (people complaining about the hosting site being down or slow and that it then is SQUAD's fault). I personally work out of GitHub and another private repo server, making releases there. It serves as an issue tracker and it's easy to use...

A better insulation could be done using a vacuum, but it would be hard to maintain the external structure...

You're also free to include KCL in your releases, the license allows for that.

Hey @damonvv, noticed a problem with your changelog files You need the KERBALCHANGELOG node around all the versions, and a bracket was missing :p Corrected one for 1.2.0.2 is here: https://pastebin.com/86f0U48L I haven't found a way of getting the nodes and values out without destroying the changelog formatting (removing the outer KERBALCHANGELOG node) in the process, and I'm looking for a solution to that... For now, you just have to make sure that everything's in a KERBALCHANGELOG { } node before a release and all the other standard cfg stuff

Doesn't look like it, however it is only up to KSP v.1.4.x, so feel free to use it on that version and try it on KSP 1.5.x, but don't bother the author about updates!

Maybe changing the animation from the flameout node in the massiveSRB part cfg? flameout { PREFAB_PARTICLE { prefabName = fx_exhaustSparks_flameout_2 transformName = fxPoint oneShot = true } AUDIO { channel = Ship clip = sound_explosion_low volume = 1.0 pitch = 2.0 loop = false } } to flameout { PREFAB_PARTICLE { prefabName = fx_smokeTrail_veryLarge transformName = fxPoint oneShot = true } AUDIO { channel = Ship clip = sound_explosion_low volume = 1.0 pitch = 2.0 loop = false } } Where the prefabName is changed to the original fx (or any other fx that you want)

You are recommended to paste the log into something like pastebin.com or upload it to Dropbox or Google drive. If you can do this, we can help with whatever problem there was, and hopefully report it to the mod author so it can be fixed.

If you could provide us with your KSP.log and some picutres of what mods you have installed that would be good, beyond that we can't help you. See below for more details

Update! v.1.1.1 of Kerbal Changelog has been released Bug fixes * Fixed incorrect version displayed in title bar and runtime error associated with it See https://github.com/BenjaminCronin/KerbalChangeLog/ releases for the latest versions, built for KSP 1.4.x and KSP 1.5.x.

Heya @Gaarst, got a new mod for you! Not quite sure where it should go, maybe in modders utilities or something?

Ah you're in luck. @Dagger just released his mod Tilt'em, which does exactly that!

Update! v.1.1 of Kerbal Changelog has been released Feature additions * Added a quick view page to see which mods have new changelogs to read (Suggested by linuxgurugamer) * Added the mod's latest version to the title bar (please see README.md for information on how to format the version string so that KCL will recognize it as a valid version and display in in the title bar) (Suggested by MrCarrot) See https://github.com/BenjaminCronin/KerbalChangeLog/releases for the latest versions, built for KSP 1.4.x and KSP 1.5.x.

Wondering if this method is the right way to go about adding energy to a part, and if so, what units the argument double energy is in. If not, a pointer to some overlooked method of adding energy to parts is appreciated. EDIT: I have made a fool of myself. A simple google later and I have found this: EDIT 2: Turns out my original question still stands: What units is "energy" in in ModuleCoreHeat.AddEnergyToCore?