Jump to content

Jcking

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    331

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Jcking

  1. Jcking
    You sure about that? (granted the crew access arm for Saturn IB is not in a place that would be traversable by the crew, but I think it was like that for the old parts as well).
  2. Jcking
    MLP works perfectly for the in development saturn parts, having already been set up for a more appropriately sized saturn since before the Apollo Saturn Revamp has started. As for the ring around the Saturn I engine mount go to ModularLaunchpads/Compatibility_Patches/BluedogDB_MLP_Patches.cfg and delete lines 9-15 (keeping the node_stack_bottom line!)
  3. Jcking
    Some notional images of Juno V with Atlas, Titan, and a new made second stage with Jupiter.
  4. Jcking
    That's not the only thing missing but it serves the job well enough as a size comparison.
  5. Jcking
    This is a known issue and is caused by switching the sim bay with the panel removed.
  6. Jcking
    Github has been having this issue of only downloading the default branch recently. If you have an account, fork it and switch the default branch from master to apollo-saturn-revamp. Here's my fork if you don't want to go through with that. https://github.com/Jcking0/Bluedog-Design-Bureau/tree/apollo-saturn-revamp
  7. Jcking
    You are in fact supposed to use the Soyuz parachute for Voskhod builds (beale did make a dedicated Voskhod chute, but cut it because it was identical to the soyuz chute).
  8. Jcking
    So that's what S-IVC came from. I only know it from a NAR Mars / Venus flyby proposal (the one with the 3 LMDE csm).
  9. Jcking
    300km will circularize with S-IVb and enough delta V to get to the Mun.
  10. Jcking
    This has been happening with other mods, and it seems it's a problem with Github itself. downloading the individual files still works however (though it is rather tedious).
  11. Jcking
    I've encountered that problem downloading alternate branches of other mods on github. Seems to be a global issue with github, however downloading the files that were created / updated in the recent commit has worked for me to get around this issue (though it is rather tedious).
  12. Jcking
    I think it's E-1
  13. Jcking
    I wish I did have physical access to those, but those images were from a NSF thread in which somebody posted the illustrations from them. https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=37347.80
  14. Jcking
    Bit of a stretch, but is the INT-20 cargo/propulsion module something you would consider?
  15. Jcking
    There's always the AAP Block III SM (A block II SM with a fourth fuel cell, enlarged cryogenic tanks, and 2600 lbs of extra RCS propellant; allowing a 45 day stay in LEO or a 35 day stay in LLO).
  16. Jcking
    Some artwork for SLC-6 (MOL configuration) seem to suggest that the angled concrete structure might be used for crew access (alternatively it might have been the mobile service tower that provided crew access like Atlas). Personally I just use the X-Large crew elevator and one of the mini crew arms in place of the Titan III service structure to act as a crew access point.
  17. Jcking
    Open ParallaxTerrain.cfg (located in the Parallax_StockTextures folder), and delete everything from line 2 to line 43 (from Body to the closing brace a line above the next Body) to disable Parallax for Kerbin. The rest of the planets follow the same format, so you can repeat until satisfied.
  18. Jcking
    This mod is scaled for a 2.5x kerbin sized solar system. As such, the mass (and capabilities of the rockets and payloads) are more limited than IRL.
  19. Jcking
    Go to KerbalismConfig/System/ScienceRework/Patches-HardDrives.cfg and scroll down to line 285-295 (there should be a comment that says "remove the ability for probe cores to store samples"), and change the value from 0 to 1 (this is a global patch that would affect all probe cores). You could also add exceptions to the probe cores in question, but I would recommend not doing this as BDB support for kerbalism is out of date, and any experiments without configs will be treated as samples (e.g. the electrostatic experiment on the Ranger probe).
  20. Jcking
    Upon further investigation, it turns out that the Atlas Surface Attach extra was messing with the Saturn S-1E/1F tank's ability to be radially attached, as both had the line: bdbTankType = bdbBalloon (unlike the other Saturn tanks). deleting the extra (or that line) resolves the issue.
  21. Jcking
    Has anybody been able to attach the S-IE and S-IF tanks to other parts radially? The part attach rules say that they should, but they refuse to do so.
  22. Jcking
    Switch the hold down arm supports from Saturn V to anything else.
  23. Jcking
    The part is already in BDBNIC (at least the Github Dev branch of BDBNIC).
  24. Jcking
    No for either. I believe he tweakscaled existing parts.
  25. Jcking
    Yes. SAS will try to keep the craft pointing towards wherever it was set. SAS should be turned off during the entirety of the reentry, as the capsule will naturally stabilize.
×
×
  • Create New...