FahmiRBLX

Nope. Yet me again. *Missile blows up on launch pad* @JERONIMO

One. Divided by 8,900,000. Does Boeing planes always bounce during landing, and are Airbus planes basically flying busses?

Just done testing my first nuclear missile. Unfortunately both blew up upon reentry. Pictured is actually the second launch of the missile; I didn't make it to take a picture of the first launch. Since the first launch is done by hand (i.e No MechJeb) the missile spun outta control that I ended up with an inclined orbit. Anyways, a picture is worth a thousand words. Retrograde burn to avoid missing the nearest adjacent peninsula East of KSC. Jettisoned the bomb. Didn't made it to the other side. Anyways, I used North Kerbin Division for the warhead, and it's the TSAR-Bomb-A.

Why not both?

53 (+) Aircraft nose up, 20 degrees, to sustain flight with a single engine.

53 (+) "Engine 1, losing power. Tower, N-777X requesting emergency landing on any runway, Squawk 7700".

53 (+) "Positive climb, gear up."

47 (+) Aw, shoot, it's 3 AM. *Yawns*

46 (+)

133 Remind me if it's about to be 135. I'd like to put a picture of a P-50 for that.

First of all, I'm trying to get most of us discussing for a more appropriate designation for every role. Like some people may prefer the designation 'X-Wing' instead of just the letter 'F' for fighters. Take note that it's still WIP. Model numbers and namings are up to users. As long as (What I'm hoping for) the designation letters are at the beginning or end of the model name. 3. Read the Notes section carefully. It's not mandatory.

Just one question : Any ideas on what's the relationship between mods (I mean game mods, not Moderators) and the designation? I meant this standardization to apply on a whole craft, not a single mod. And crafts might comprise of several different mods.

Well the mentioned situation is that when noth sides of the Mk1 cabin has something attached either by radially on the surface or via nodes. While @Frankenshtine's situation is that no EVAs can be performed even with both sides are left empty; just pure air.

Well all of us could discuss on letters for different aircraft roles that all of us agrees, and hence the reason I put this on KSP Discussion at the first place. And hence turning the '15 Standards Problem' situation by unifying them as one, hence we got a single standard we all agree. Though when you said that you moved the thread to Spacecraft Exchange I thought I posted the thread in the wrong subforum.

44 (+) My class is about to start, can someone hold my torch?

I know that, hence the word aircraft in the OP, which means only applies for aircrafts. For rocket buffs, they don't need to build their own plane for. EDIT : OP has been updated.

41 (+) *Blasts every single anthem that exist on Earth*

This applies for the whole aircraft, not individual parts.

Wait I thought the Klaw denies crew transfers.

*Facepalms* -snip-

I'm not gonna say that thehinge wing is redundant, but is, seriously no joke, a genius solution in terms of making variable-geometry wings without the expense of more drag and no lift. I even hyped for that part to make a variable-swept wing fighter. Seriously, you should bring that hinge wing into the next update. To decipher : ... . . / ... .--. --- .. .-.. . .-.

Because some of the awe is acceptable but the full awe is unacceptable because the full awe affects emotions. If "Hymn For The Weekend" exist, what about "Hymn For The Weekday"? If it exist, how will it sound?

Well at least it's not that mandatory, but at least we could have the not-so-mandatory tail number prefix going on. Letters and numbers after 10K- is up to builders.

Just tested my CRJ-1000-based SSTO and I couldn't make it to orbit. Maybe I'll shall try a different ascent profile or re-engine the four Lotuses with Whiplashes. Check my profile status for more info.

[WIP] What I'm doing here is not to simply execute a roleplay here, but to standardize things out. Ever became sick of non-standardized stuff around the uploaded planes? Anyways, this only applies to planes, feel free to call whatever for your rockets. Important : Model Prefixes are open for discussions. VERY IMPORTANT : Before anyone complain, read this whole post. This standardization isn't mandatory, but tail number prefix is a bit prioritized. Number One Aircraft Tail Number Some might came with the idea on applying tail numbers of their planes in Mission Reports, but the prefixes aren't exactly the same. So now, I petition that the tail number prefix of the whole Kerbin is 10K-*. Case closed. Number Two Model Prefix So what we have around here? Airliners, freighters, helicopters, bombers, ground attack, gunship, SSTO, submersiles, lighter-than-air, sea-based, Green propulsion, etc? Bear in mind this have similarities with the standard United States aircraft designations. If the aircraft serves for more than one role, the aircraft shall have both alhabets representing its roles. Example, a ground attack aircraft and bomber has AB-* or it is also a fighter, hence ABF-*. Or it's an experimental fighter VTOL SSTO, hence XVSF-*. Numbers, letters or words before and after this is up to you. Example : Frontinco-North American YF-86M Venom Sabre, Royal Aerospace P-Box II, GAI P-K38/52, etc. Alphabet Role A Ground Attack B Bomber C Freighter D* Lighter-Than-Air (Airships) (e.g Heisenberg Mod) E Reconnaissance F Fighter G Gyrocopters & rotary-wing aircraft with separate engine for forward propulsion. H Helicopter I Ornihopter J Gunship (Must use with prefix A-, such as AJ-*) (Applies to heavily-armed ground attack aircraft, in other words, buff planes) K Other body-optimised (Planes you make to fly in atmospheres other than Kerbin or didn't perform good enough (Or efficient enough) on Kerbin but good on Duna, Eve, etc.) (Only for planes optimised for atmospheres unable to support Jet Engine operations) L Rocket-propelled aircraft M N O Glider P Airliner Q Unmanned R Conversion S* SSTO T Trainer U* Utility (General Aviation or No purpose) V VTOL W Research (Planes that fly to take experiments from a body) X Experimental (Let's say you're making your first Breaking Grounds electric plane, but you're still tweaking it around to get things right, a lot) Y Almost-final version (The one, let's say, you're making a Duna SSTO, but the 'final' design isn't used for the real deal) Z Electric propulsion (Xenon or Electric Propeller) Note This will apply to future planes. Don't hesitate to not to go to KerbalX only to change your airplane naming but you may change it as you wish to follow this standard or not. Letters with no 'explanation text' in the above list means no roles designated to the alphabets. Letters in the above list, marked with Asterisk (*) means they're less encouraged, but still encouraged at a 'lower' level. You may choose to not to use this, but I encourage the usage of this guideline. The whole guideline isn't mandatory, but again, encouraged. Don't hesitate to reply if you have suggestions or thoughts.