Jump to content

Spaceman.Spiff

Members
  • Posts

    1,858
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Spaceman.Spiff

  1. Ok. Maybe we need a Near Future Aero(spikes) The RD-0169A for the Amur rocket might be decent. Seems like it would be more of a 1.25/875 though. After a quick look, most of the others are smaller launch vehicles. Aeon 1 (Relativity Space), Mira LM10 (WIP Italian upper stage), and it looks like Firefly Aerospace is also making one. Other than that, there doesn't seem to be a lot out there. Perhaps a methalox RL-10 variant or a J-2XM? Something else I just thought of: A Methalox RAPIER type engine. Probably better for NFA though.This link has a few ideas, but it's mostly russian concept engines http://www.astronautix.com/l/loxlch4.html Sorry for the kind of garbled thought process. That's just how I roll EDIT: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170005557 Some NASA concepts for ya. I think the French 1 MN design might fit the bill. Also I kind of assumed you were already planning a BE-4 and Raptor/vac, but for a Starship Lunar variant, maybe a radial attachable engine in the vein of the NFS landing/abort motors? even more
  2. It's really quite simple. That link goes to a guide that uses imgur. It's free and you don't need an account. How Do I Post Pictures?
  3. Unfortunately the KSP2 team's #1 cheerleader hasn't been active for over a month Maybe we can annoy (joking) some other important people. @Stratzenblitz75
  4. nope. I want to ping someone new for the thread, but I don't want to annoy anyone. I guess it' good ol @Souptime for now.
  5. Granted. whatever that is happens but everything in the universe simultaneously implodes and explodes in a quantum state and then disappears. #phyziks I wish for danny2462 to post a video
  6. banned for negative levels of grammar. (to, too, two)
  7. granted. go open another unrelated thread. I wish for name coloration on the forums
  8. BRRRRRRRRRR Anyways, Yay!!! So glad this is happening! Have you considered a DEAN Aerospike? https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a558199.pdf I think it would be a cool addition. (are you still figuring out scope? If not then I'll stop suggesting things)
  9. I don’t know how much the docking process itself should be changed, but the ports should get nerfed.
  10. Yeah you need to either add the SSPXR Metal (from the Extras that came with the mod) folder to you Gamedata, or you can just delete them. The B9PS warning is harmless.
  11. Maybe someone else has suggested it, or you don't want to, but have you considered rotating crew? Not sure how difficult it would be, but if you did a Kerbin assist then you could send up a fresh crew during the flyby, the capsule would just need a lot of DV to reach escape velocity, dock, and then return to orbit.
  12. That's an interesting concept.... Maybe I can grab some ore now so I can have choice of fuel from exospheric harvesting. I still feel like that would cause TONS of lag. If they were like parts I wonder if they could use TU for PBR shading. That would be amazing
  13. Welcome to the Forum!!! I hope we get to see some of your writing in the Fan Works or Mission Reports section!!!
  14. What’s the difference between a moderator and a forum admin (wondering because I just saw one online.) They have red names. Looks snazzy, but according to Adsii’s Star Trek logic, they’re the expendables
×
×
  • Create New...