Jump to content

EvilSpace

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    42

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by EvilSpace

  1. EvilSpace
    KSP2 after release will probably take not months, but years to fix, maybe even 2-3 before it is a stable product. But... even on release, it will be 100 times better than this indie game from 2011, where at the beginning there were graphics of the 20th century level and parachutes opened in space. The entire life path of KSP1 was like eternal suffering, the end of which is KSP2.
  2. EvilSpace
    I don't see any point in KSP now, it's an outdated product. Vanilla KSP 2 will immediately have its own waterfall and customization of parts, which simplifies modding and deprives the original KSP of any meaning. You did the right thing by finishing Tantares for KSP 1
  3. EvilSpace
    This mod is too outdated (visually), if I were you I would use Near Future Spacecraft, it has a capsule that looks like a capsule from the old PTK NP "Federation" concept. In addition, Contares has a completely incomprehensible balance of the standard system (why?), But NFS works in x2.5 system
  4. EvilSpace
    Not soon, people voted to work on a dull mod for engines (SSME options for example), this discouraged me from using KSP. This is already an outdated game, and I am more than convinced that KSP2 in 3-4 years after the release will be better in everything.
  5. EvilSpace
    No, my parts broke immediately after entering Jupiter's radiation belt. By "shielding" I meant the high quality of the parts, which makes them more resistant to radiation. So far, I've only decided to play with TAC Life Support and Kerbal Heath. There's even a plus to this, as the game has become less littered with a huge number of features.
  6. EvilSpace
    How to play with this? I'm playing KSRSS x2.5, and I can't get close to Jupiter (Galileo) at all, the radiation immediately destroys my antennas and other details. And this is even with maximum shielding.
  7. EvilSpace
    Modern game, modern spaceship, modern graphic.
  8. EvilSpace
    After my testing of the lunar direct ascent lander, the main (and unsolvable) problem was the redundancy of the launch vehicle. In the realities of the KSP (x2.5), the alternative lander lunar direct ascent turns out to be approximately the same in mass as the legendary "Eagle + Apollo", which is why the meaning in Saturn C-8 simply falls off for the lunar missions of the KSP. The only place where Saturn C-8 can come in handy is either martian missions or delivering heavier payloads to LEO. The lander can, of course, be increased, thereby solving the Saturn C-8 redundancy problem, but this is beyond the scope of historical accuracy, since the "canon" uses the usual Apollo capsule. At the very least, I would rather not mess with it, but use the power of Saturn C-8 where it is really needed.
  9. EvilSpace
    At the expense of the Nova C-8, this wonderful (yes, yes, I am very angry when this missile is considered unworthy of the BDB, while a bunch of garbage parts like the Nimbus or would-be spy laboratories are considered "useful") As a last resort, Nova can be built using SSTU or procedural parts (or both) Tonight I was able to sketch Nova proving that the idea is quite viable. I have 32GB RAM and I can install a lot of mods, but for people with less capacity, there is a theoretical way out - just remove the unnecessary parts of the SSTU, leaving only what is needed, thereby reducing the file size. Or use procedural parts. This is a very useful and convenient thing, it does not take up much space and, in my opinion, should be installed by EVERYONE for all occasions.
  10. EvilSpace
    What about Parallax? do you plan to support it? in 2022, KSP 2 is released (perhaps finally with advanced orbital mechanics and axis tilt) and I don't think that it will soon become relevant to invest in the development of this mod for the old game of 2011.
  11. EvilSpace
    Hello. A month ago, I wrote in the support thread about the inoperative function of changing the nuclear fusion mode (swap fuel) After downloading KSP-I 1.29.5 (I am using KSP 1.12), the problem still remains. I don’t know how long ago it appeared, but when you try to switch the fuel mode (whether it be a reactor or a NERVA-type engine), some kind of error occurs. Using the LMCR example, I want to change the Uranium-238 TVR to Plutonium TVR. As soon as I press "Swap Fules" - the part is completely unusable. After applying swap fuel Same with other parts My GameData (Clean install)
  12. EvilSpace
    KSC Switcher (RSS and KSRSS) It also adds the rest of the world's spaceports.
  13. EvilSpace
    Is it possible to do something in x2.5 in order to be able to make launches to the moon during the day? (because now KSCs such as Baikonur or Cape) pass over the plane of the moon exclusively at night.
  14. EvilSpace
    The developer of this mod has already announced the termination of its support. In addition, this is voluntary work and no one is obliged to do anything. Plus Tantares is an arcade mod for Soviet rockets, if you want RD-7XX you should take a look at MAKS from Raiz space
  15. EvilSpace
    Beautiful and damn dangerous spaceship
  16. EvilSpace
    You are absolutely right. For the same reason, I do not like Far Future Propulsion, despite the fact that the quality of the textures there is at the highest level - the balancing was created for casuals. An ion engine producing kilonewtons of thrust is an unacceptable phenomenon for me. Fortunately, the KSP-I is realistic in this regard. However, the annoying mistake of the KSP-I does not even give me the opportunity to switch the fuel mode! I hope this will be corrected in the future, since from now on the thorium cycle in a nuclear reactor on molten salts (for example) is simply NOT AVAILABLE.
  17. EvilSpace
    HELP! "swap fuel" BROKEN I am using KSP 1.12.2 and a clean install (to make sure there are no conflicts) This applies not only to reactors, but also to nuclear engines of the NERVA type, when trying to switch the fuel mode to an alternative one. GameData:
×
×
  • Create New...