Staticalliam7

Jeposjaggermeisteral

Kerbin is hard enough to get off, but good god, 4Gs?

oops I accidentally didn't follow my own thread lol hmm ok

There are. You probably installed via CKAN? Then you need the second mod also - "Parallax - Stock Planet Textures" I did not use CKAN (I prefer to install manually) and I have both mods

Why are there no configs for kerbin?

can you help me not fail spanish lol

The good news is, there hasn't been a single (announced) delay in over 10 months! To contrast, there were delays every 3-6 months through 2019 and 2020, so it seems like they have a release timeframe that works and a good handle on what they're doing. Don't say that! You are going to jinx us all! Simple solution: Step one: Get a sledge hammer Step 2: Smash said mac Step 3: Build a pc Step 4: Download Steam Step 5: Download KSP 2 Step 6: Profit.

yes and I recommend it a lot because the plumes look great Cool! I was wondering if waterfall had jet plumes, but to be completely honest, when i downloaded it I was too busy admiring the rocket plumes

How do i land

banned for having a name I can't pronounce

oh hi was i not supposed to click this?

Got bored and decided to run my pfp through deep dream generator. Here are the results:

Unfortunately, no. You will have to buy it separately. Also, if you buy it, just get Complete Edition. I got the base game and now I wish I had got the full game..

Let me introduce my awful rig: Watercooled Core i7 8gb of DDR3 RAM Had 16 but killed 8gb of it because i'm an idiot and static shocked them to death) Overclocked GT730 (+275mhz) 2TB HDD Dual boot of Ubuntu 21.04 and Windows 10 Now, as you can see, I have a serious bottleneck here. Why? Because everything is so overpriced I can't buy a damn graphics card. I do actually plan on upgrading to 32GB of ram (motherboard maximum) Also, if you are curious, my graphics card sits at 40C and 60 at max load

(Couldn't find a good place for this) I've seen some people make infographics for their rockets, and was wondering how they did this?

Very nice! Are you using Waterfall for the jet engine plumes (Haven't got around to testing out jet plumes yet lol)

Fully agree. I'd like to be able to use the lH2 only version in thicker atmospheres, when high TWR isn't needed, such as on something like Titan. I'd also like to be able to maximize vacuum dV even when using the high TWR afterburner mode, such as when landing on Tylo. Well, I think automatic switching would be convenient, like the autoswitching on the rapier... but I can also imagine wanting manual control over it, such as making somewhat shorter vacuum landers: retract the nozzle before touching down. I can see 2 ways this works: 1) a toggle for the nozzle, and a toggle for the afterburner. The first dynamically changes the atmosphere Isp curve for the engine, the 2nd dynamically changes the overall Isp, thrust, and resource consumption (adding O2). I'm not surehow much of a change to the game engine this would require 2) a multimode engine with 4 modes. If I'm not mistaken, already we can have 3+ engine modes in the game code, even if we only have engines with 2 modes (rapier, panther). This would be a little awkward to switch between modes, as you'd have 4 modes to cycle through to get the one that you want. I imagine that mostly during a burn, you'd be going from high TWR and atmo pressure, to low TWR and low atmo pressure, so I'd have the order go: i) Afterburner, nozzle retracted; ii) Afterburner, nozzle extended; iii) No Afterburner, nozzle extended; iv) No Afterburner, nozzle retracted; This would allow easy cycling during a burn from the surface of a planet with an atmosphere. In this case, generally you'd want: 1st, high TWR and the nozzle adapted to a high ambient pressure. 2nd High TWR, but an extended nozzle as the rocket climbs. 3rd low TWR and high Isp as you circularize your orbit. The no afterburner, nozzle retracted case isn't needed. If you want to land on something like Mun, you'd probably not want the afterburner, so you'd go from no burner, extended to no burner, retracted (for touchdown) - this order works again. But it would be inconvenient when you want to land with the burner on, but the nozzle retracted, supposing you come in with burner on and nozzle extended (such as on Tylo), you need to press the cycle button 3 times rapidly to get to the burner+retracted mode for landing. Similarly, taking off from Mun with the mode initially being: no-burner, retracted - if you want to switch to no burner, extended, you'd cut the engine, and have to cycle 3 times to get to the mode you want... So if we can't just have independent toggles for the burner and the nozzle, 4 modes to cycle through would be a bit annoying. When I saw this, I immediately thought of a different solution. Add 2 sliders: Afterburner throttle (restricts the amount of afterburner LOX flowing), and a Nozzle slider to extend and retract the nozzle

Simplerockets 2 does a wonderful job of realistic startups (which makes nuclear take painfully long to throttle up and down), However, for ksp, Just do this. Much easier

"Hey look! There's life on Mars now! Wait, since I now live on a different planet, I would be considered a alien. Which means, when I return, I can start a alien invasion". Or, "Where's the oxygen?" OR, "Oh wait, this is Mars? My GPS must be broke" Or, "Where's my sticker doc?" Yes. Very strange movie I still want same day shipping...

thou shalt not spin any faster than 68 rpm

Lets hope the FAA approves of the flight. Fingers crossed

lets goooooo steam deck gang! but seriously, Steam Play will probably support both games. (And if not you can always make it....)

i'm planning something whos more OP

The steam beta feature can go back to like,1.2 but besides that i don't know