Jump to content

Giggleplex777

Members
  • Posts

    2,505
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Giggleplex777

  1. What's the TWR of your lander? If it's lower than 3, I recommend landing it like this:
  2. I'll post it in Pico Space Program. Meanwhile, here's it on its Zenit launcher:
  3. Can we do an Apollo 8 style mission? I don't feel like landing on the Mun today (or tomorrow). 10 points for me it will be!
  4. Welcome to the forums! I see that you have made lots of progress for someone who started a week ago.
  5. They're not very efficient, but they are the only engines that could do the job. I just ended up slapping a lot of fuel to the first stage. I'll try that. Also:
  6. I built this 300+ part monstrosity and it's only capable of small hops. But it works!
  7. I built and tested stock variable-incidence wings:
  8. I have not yet made a cyclogyro (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclogyro).
  9. Those are my favorites too. I have much more to post if only I can get imgur working again.
  10. I'm sorry for your loss. Here's your Imgur album (Quote to see how you do it).
  11. It affects unfortunate users with low-end computers the most (obviously) but it might ever so slightly decease performance with even the best rigs. Also, looking up at the sky reduces lag too.
  12. New Horizons: And this launch vehicle, the Atlas V 551: I also made the whole Atlas V series: 400 Series: 500 Series: And even Atlas-Centaur:
  13. Apparently, lag slightly decreases the performance of crafts in KSP. Turning the settings down and putting the max Delta time to 1.00 should yield better results.
  14. Looking through my screenshots and I found this: It's powered by 24-77s and it kinda looks like an octopus.
  15. I first landed on the Mun before we had landing legs, so my rocket fell over and everything was destroyed except for the command pod.
×
×
  • Create New...