Melfice

KSC R&D designs (or at least requests) most of the parts, the various companies produce them. In some cases they're shelf-bought. Seems like a reasonable explanation.

You're the one who watched the video, you tell me? I'm still re-learning how to build aircraft again. It's been a while.

If people've made them smaller, then it's possible. That, or they play on such a ridiculously huge resolution that the option is available to them, but not to you because you play on 800x600 (no, you're probably not, but you get the point I'm making, right?).

Do they have a radar?

There is no reason to believe next update's gonna be 1.0. There's still 0.10 all the way up to 0.infinity before 1.0 rolls around.

KerbPaint, likely.

How is this not a PSA!?

Probably a false positive. Don't use CKAN if you want to be absolutely sure.

I have. There's nothing explicitly saying stealth isn't a thing. Or, if it IS saying it, it's saying it in a very unclear way to me. If I recall correctly from reading earlier posts, Baha was tinkering with a way to have the craft's size determine its radar signature, but I don't recall if anything came of that.

Previous versions can be downloaded from the Changelog page on Kerbalstuff. Just scroll down to the version you want, and there'll be a download button.

The "Build Your Own Missile" feature is still work in progress, and BahamutoD is currently working on the radar feature. It may be a while before he gets to this feature again. Maybe it's the next feature. Time will tell, so be patient.

If it doesn't work with 1.0.4, you'd better tell Randazzo. Seeing as it's been updated for 1.0.4 since, at least, June 30th.

Try not using CKAN, maybe? I'm thinking CKAN is installing it wrong, in some way.

Get a Playstation 2. Get Ace Combat 5. Try not to cry.

Checklist: 1 ) Does it follow the license in the first post? 0 YES | 0 NO | 0 NOT SURE 2a) Did I use any assets whose license prohibit redistribution (without permission)? 0 YES | 0 NO | 0 NOT SURE 2b) Did I ask permission (where applicable) to redistribute said assets? 0 YES | 0 NO | 0 NOT SURE 3 ) Do I think my part is interesting enough to distribute? 0 YES | 0 NO | 0 NOT SURE If you answered 1, 2b and 3 with YES, and 2a with NO: Go for it! Don't even ask! If you answered NOT SURE four times... you may want to find out before continuing. (Just having a bit of fun. Hope you laughed! If not, I'm sorry.)

Have you tried it? It might just work.

So, like Foxster said, it really doesn't matter.

Why be intelligent when you can criticize Squad? It's the cool thing to do, these days.

Tracks are not part of the mod. You'll want Kerbal Foundries for that.

Early access doesn't have the best of reputation these days. I don't blame Squad for wanting to rush out of there.

I agree. My point is, people in here seem to be under the delusion (intentionally, I would say in some cases. You know who you are. Cut that out, or get out. Seriously.) that Squad is the one who decided that 1.0 doesn't mean finished.

Why not? We redefine things all the time. And let's be honest. 1.0 hasn't meant "finished" for quite a while now. Why are you blaming Squad for something that has changed quite a long time ago. "Day one patch", anyone?

See those numbers on the navball? North = 0/360 East = 90 South = 180 West = 270

Glad to have been able to help, acc.

Wrong mod. I think it's B.Dynamics you want.