Trollkowski

Looking very good! I'm sure you've already experimented with it but if you add some flapping to your blades it should help extract some more high speed performance out of them, but it's a tricky pursuit. I would suggest trying different configurations using struts to dampen the flapping (or the game will throw the blades every which way it pleases). There is a really good guide made by Rpatto92 that could be of help in this regard I saw your craft on kerbalx and sadly I experienced the same yawing/"gliding" with my tandem rotor but didn't manage to fix it. I'm sure it's fixable but it would probably take a ton of testing and tweaking. I hope you make impactful gains with this design!

Hi! Would there be a reason why FAR breaks the toggle pwing introduced where you can switch a pwing from a lifting surface to structural? Ive tested it myself and with a clean install of ksp and pwing it works, but if i install FAR after the toggle option doesnt work anymore. I assume this is because FAR handles lifting surfaces differently, but is there any way to make FAR react to this change and properly represent the part as structural? EDIT: I've found a workaround. Simply create a copy of your installation and remove FAR and then remove the lift config from each respective wing part, and then transfer the craft back to your original game. This keeps the lift for those parts at 0.

Update to this; I've tested it myself and it seems FAR is breaking this option. Made a clean install and installed only pwing and it worked. Tried installing FAR next and after that the feature does nothing Update2: I've found a workaround. What you would need to do is create a copy of your installation and remove FAR. Then load your craft and remove the lift from the pwing parts you want. After that, simply transfer your craft over to your main installation (where you have FAR) and the 0 lift on those parts will transfer.

@linuxgurugamer Hi! Any chance you have had the time to take a look at the issue regarding not being able to select a pwing as a structural part and not a lifting surface? I posted logs in an earlier reply I don't mean to be a bother, just checking in!

I appreciate you taking a look! Heres my latest log (i played for a bit so it might be long, let me know if you just want me to launch ksp > go to sph > pick engine and launch) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1csCuZ_k3HIjUZ5lpjB5AdX_sPmDbYTFB/view

Thanks for the suggestion! I double checked and it was set to sea level kerbin. Sadly seems to be an overall problem with the craft I'm building as I just tried adding a stock engine to it and it still displays it as 0.00, so not at all related to ap+

Hi! Any idea why the f22-style engines report 0.00 twr in the sph? I should provide logs but not home at the moment, could update this post later The engines work fine when flying so its not like they dont produce thrust Very likely this could be another mod interfering but the game reports correct twr for engines from other mods/stock

Thank you! It handles decently well I would say. At high speeds (Around 400m/s) it sometimes has a habit of ripping the cockpit apart when performing high G maneuvers due to it being made with procedural wing parts, but it wouldn't be realistic to pull those kinds of G's anyways. I slightly increased the power of the engines it uses (went from ~0.93 TWR to about 1.12) through configs to more evenly match real world performance and I sadly have to use some gimbal to get it to turn well when fully loaded, but if I jettison all bombs and the fuel pods it flies great even without the use of gimbal. I'm planning on uploading it to kerbalX soon enough, including three different 'liveries' (144th FW F-15, California ANG 75th Anniversary, 75th Anniversary of Oregon ANG)

Hi! I'm having an issue placing IR parts in symmetry on pwing and some other parts. The mirrored part ends up in front of the one I placed. See this for example: It seems this issue was fixed a while back but it appears I'm experiencing it on the latest build. Could you please take a look? It for some reason works on some parts, see below for example. Here I placed them on the landing skids from airplane plus and it seems to work fine. I've uploaded my logs here: https://files.catbox.moe/zdrk6n.rar Let me know if you would prefer a different host

Thank you!

@linuxgurugamer Hello! If you have the time, could you please have a look at this? I have uploaded logs here: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/yhmte34rizkj7ivseekui/logs.rar?rlkey=og17y04lrpmm1mif3u08gfkn1&st=t7zdxyqg&dl=0 As you can see in the screenshot below, I am mid press but nothing happens at all, and the COL doesnt change:

She flies!

Hi! Is there a way to add the propeller sounds (going from low > high rpm) directly to the rotors? My issue is that Ive built a couple of helicopters but they dont actually produce the blade/propeller noise as the blades and props arent directly connected to the rotor. If I attach blades directly to the nodes on the rotors they do play the sound though. I had a look in the configs and I figured I would simply replace this part: @PART[rotor_01,rotor_01s]:FOR[RocketSoundEnhancementDefault] // EM-16 Light Duty Rotor { MODULE { name = RSE_RotorEngines volume = 0.35 Motor { SOUNDLAYER { name = ElectricMotor_Small-300hz audioClip = RocketSoundEnhancementDefault/Sounds/ElectricMotors/ElectricMotor_Small-300hz loop = true spread = 0.3 spool = true spoolSpeed = 0.16 volume = 0.0 0.0 volume = 0.25 1.0 pitchFC { key = 0 0 0 6.14 key = 1 3.07 0 0 } } } } } With this (but changing the name of the part to the rotor): @PART[mediumHeliBlade]:FOR[RocketSoundEnhancementDefault] { RSE_Propellers { baseRPM = 450 maxBlades = 8 volume = 0.0 0.0 volume = 0.75 1.0 SOUNDLAYER { name = Heli_Blade_Small_450-2b audioClip = RocketSoundEnhancementDefault/Sounds/Propellers/Heli_Blade_Small_450-2b loop = true spread = 0.5 volumeFC { key = 0 0 0 0 key = 0.1 1 0 0 key = 0.25 1 0 0 key = 0.5 0 0 0 } pitchFC { key = 0 0 key = 0.5 2 } } SOUNDLAYER { name = Heli_Blade_Small_450-4b audioClip = RocketSoundEnhancementDefault/Sounds/Propellers/Heli_Blade_Small_450-4b loop = true spread = 0.5 volumeFC { key = 0.25 0.0 0 0 key = 0.5 1.0 0 0 key = 1.0 0.0 0 0 } pitchFC { key = 0.25 0.5 key = 1 2 } } SOUNDLAYER { name = Heli_Blade_Small_450-8b audioClip = RocketSoundEnhancementDefault/Sounds/Propellers/Heli_Blade_Small_450-8b loop = true spread = 0.5 volumeFC { key = 0.5 0.0 0 0 key = 1.0 1.0 0 0 } pitchFC { key = 0.5 0.5 key = 2.0 2.0 } } } } Would this work or am I gonna break some things? EDIT: Doing the above worked beautifully! Instead of replacing the entire module I instead simply added the parts labeled "SOUNDLAYER" from the propeller config to the rotor config. This stacks the blade sound on top of the rotor sound which makes it sound a lot better in my opinion.

Finished the apache! On to the next one

One thing ive noticed by the way that might be helpful for when you do figure out how to scale robotics is that they seem to get wobblier as their mass decreases. Might just be my installation but, when trying to adjust the mass of the rotors through the configs for example they get more wobbly the lower of a value i put in. So perhaps keeping the same weight/mass as they scale might be something to look into

Thank you Lisias! I will give it a try once it is released!

Gotcha, so its most likely another mod interfering? Heres my KSP.log file if you would like to take a peek!

Sadly dont know what that is, Ive simply installed the latest version of tweakscale and have done no editing in the configs for tweakscale

Hi! Im experiencing an issue with rescaling breaking ground robotics, when I do they appear fine at first but after launching the craft and going back to the sph the nodes are floating way in the distance and after launching the cylinders/hinges and whatnot still have the same range of motion making the whole thing look very weird The diameter in the scaling option also doesnt match whatever its connected to, the rotor for example shows 0.800m while connected to structural pieces that are 0.190m I have quite a lot of mods installed but I was mainly wondering if this is a known issue and if there is any fix for it or if there might be some kind of conflict in the mods? I can provide logs and whatever is necessary IR seems to scale well but is limited to a few different sizes sadly