Jump to content

rbray89

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,719

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by rbray89

  1. rbray89
    I always thought it was made of cheese?
  2. rbray89
    What I'm working on now: Looks like I'll have to replace the terrain and ocean shaders first though, as they aren't doing depth buffer writes in the terrain shader for some reason. I hope it isn't a good reason. In related conversation, does anyone have good grass/mountain/sand/water textures that I can use?
  3. rbray89
    Exactly. I have a potential fix in mind, but not for a while. I also just added a basic FAQ section in the OP, which was LOOOOOOONG overdue.
  4. rbray89
    Haha, very true. The mod spotlight is both a blessing and a curse it seems.
  5. rbray89
    Haha, glad to hear it is working well for you!
  6. rbray89
    Hmmm... I have used the nasa parts without problems. Which parts EXACTLY are giving the issues?
  7. rbray89
    Yes and no. If they make a pack to replace the defaults, then they should specify in the instructions to delete the original config file (or overlap it) but for other effects (atmosphere, etc) they should have separate config files.
  8. rbray89
    Exactly. It will show up in the GUI as a new config file. For now, there is no way to ADD new configs through the gui, but you can cycle through and edit them that way.
  9. rbray89
    They do. What part/parts exactly? What OS are you running?
  10. rbray89
    Possibly. That's all I can say for now until I start more work.
  11. rbray89
    You have to install the gamedata folder into your KSP install, or copy EVERYTHING from the mod gamedata folder into your ksp gamedata folder.
  12. rbray89
    Space center or in-flight.
  13. rbray89
    I don't believe I updated the binary, so yes, it should.
  14. rbray89
    No, it should still work. - - - Updated - - - Yes, I'll do that soon.
  15. rbray89
    Haha, I really didn't give much thought into where my plugins would go, and really should of thought about it more. They just need to be cleanly installed due to the separation of the plugins from content/configs.Once that is done, everything is good, and the new versions of the two mods can just be installed by over the old versions without issue.
  16. rbray89
    DXT is faster in terms of graphics performance (less color data to move around, sample, etc.), so I would seriously consider getting it implemented.
  17. rbray89
    Not yet. I want to keep them in map view, but I'm thinking of a "Radar" type view that would let you see through atmospheres.
  18. rbray89
    Haha, it SHOULD work, but I'm sure you'll let me know if it doesn't
  19. rbray89
    Updated the Release. Fixes the config mechanism, adds better support for multiple config files.
  20. rbray89
    No problem, It is understandable.
  21. rbray89
    Hmmm... do you know what was in the layers preventing it from saving? do you have the output_log.txt file? Sorry, I tried to get the saving working well, but there was a considerable amount of "rework" with the new config mechanism and gui changes.
  22. rbray89
    Can you go into KSP_data and post your output_log.txt file please? It should tell me everything I need to know.
  23. rbray89
    Nice! I'm hoping to make this native in the shader though. The "shadows" are a nice touch.
  24. rbray89
    Exactly. Some of those packs use PNG instead of MBM, which means I can't detect that they are supposed to be treated as normal maps.
  25. rbray89
    Found the culprit Will be fixed in next release.
×
×
  • Create New...