ZedNova

Here's how I'd rank it. Russia US ESA China Japan India Canada Israel Iran Poland Me North Korea. There's really no way to say my list is wrong unless there's some more details on what we're ranking them by.

I honestly can't say for sure, I've never used it so i can't tell you how much of a performance hit it makes. Likely you'll lose 10 frames or more, but that's a guesstimate.

Yeah the US should probably be an option, since we can't space right now.

It's more of a card you find on laptops, but it's adequate for KSP.

Here's something that might work : http://www.amazon.com/CyberpowerPC-Gamer-Ultra-GUA880-Desktop/dp/B0089KDCIU/ref=sr_1_1?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1414204989&sr=1-1&keywords=desktop Graphics card sucks, but should be able to play KSP fine. Something that you can upgrade for 170 bucks later and have a good gaming rig. Yes, that looks like a good system.

I'd get a cheap PC with a decent CPU, then buy a graphics card separately. That's if you're absolutely not willing to build one.

I'm pretty much speechless...

Here's my budget gaming build: AMD 10-6800k 4.1ghz (Overclocked to 4.6) Crucial Ballistix Sport, 4Gb x2, 1600Mhz. Gigabyte f2a88xm-d3h Motherboard MSI R9 270 OC "Gaming". 2Gb. HDD: 1Tb western digital Blue 7200Rpm. SSD: 128Gb crucial MX100. Rosewill line-m case. The CPU is the only bottleneck in the system, and it's not noticeable unless you're converting video or unzipping huge files. Otherwise all my games run at 60+ FPS. EDIT: Added pictures, although they're not very high quality.

It allows it to land accurately, so it can be refueled, reloaded and reused quickly without waiting for someone to pick the crew up in the sea. It still has parachutes in case the rockets fail.

Nope, .25 added destructible buildings. everything including the launchpad and runway can be destroyed, and you need to pay for it to have it fixed.

You can use both with steam. Yeah you guys should join us, there's only around 6 people in chat at peak times. And that's a shame considering we hand out cookies at regular intervals.

Keyboard mouse, and a joystick occasionally.

So is this working for .25? If not, are there any workarounds?

Doctor who is just supposed to be fun "Sci-fi". The last episode with the 2 dimensional beings was just as outlandish as the moon one.

So that way if you lose your box copy, you still have a digital copy?

Happens to alot of people. Just remember to thank our lord, Gaben Newell: http://new2.fjcdn.com/comments/And+gabe+spake+all+these+words+saying+i+_cb6beb1f40028c7995845d931ad2499f.jpg

Looks great, I'm looking forward to playing it.

Alt+F12 Click hack gravity, infinite fuel.

Kerbals sweat monopropellant.

Soyuz, i'd rather explode into a bunch of pretty sparkles than die slowly from suffocation.

Make sure your rear landing gear is close to the center of mass, without making it tip backwards with no pressure.

You'll be able to run whatever you want at the highest settings no problem with that.

You really think that no one would respond to something like that? This is the internet. People will get offended, and people will care no matter how stupid, irrelevant or just plain unreadable your post is. The only reason threads like that fall off the forum into oblivion is BECAUSE the moderators step in and lock them. Even an honest respectful discussion can and most likely will eventually turn into a contest of who can come up with the best insult. I can easily see this one getting closed.

I just flew it and i'm not sure what the problem is, all i had to do was set the thrust limiter for the main engine to 80 right before the booster separation, then set it to 50ish when i was on the last tank. It's slow and not efficient at all, and i'm not sure it could even get a payload into orbit, but it flies well enough to get into orbit. Note: I flew it with the shuttle part on top of the tank while flying at the 90.

The devs are totally open to criticism. It's just most of the time the threads "Criticizing" them are really just complaining posts that develop into a flamewar.