BFGfreak

If you think that's scary, just wait until you discover that when squad said everything is destructible, they meant EVERYTHING (including segments of the runway) Well the good news is that it takes 3 or 4 destroyed segments to bring your runway "out of commission", so I guess there's that if you don't mind trying taking off before you get to wh

Well if you can get this to play nice with EVE I'd be really impressed.

Danny2462 laughs at the kraken, for he can summon it at will.

But other than the whole testing on launchpad bit, everything is set up properly? I'll see about making one that goes into space and test it from there. Edit: Ok, I flung it out into space and it works. Produces really cute levels of thrust which would explain why it was having trouble on kerbin's surface

I'm not sure if I just had a bad install, but those new mag nozzles don't seem to be doing much of anything, also the scale seems to be a little off.

Yeah I didn't apply because I knew you needed people who would be able to reproduce Danny2462's latest video to find out what happened.

Great, you broke the 4th wall.....

You lose all your Lanius to RNG events leaving you with your lone human.

And he hugs the disintegration beam like a boss. PS, he lives.

OK, very funny astronomer, now stop posting pics of space engine

Hey Porkjet, I asked this on your development thread, but I figure it wouldn't hurt to ask here as well, anyway have you thought about adding a mk2 to size 2 part?

First off, I think you'd get much better attention if you labeled your poll a little less whimsically. Secondly we could definitely use more rasta...I mean raster modules, this in addition to how many kerbal life mods fail to see the light of day makes me think you should probably get your foot in the door with raster screens and when you feel a bit more comfortable with the inner workings of KSP you can try some of these other suggestions.

What about a checkbox/toggle that changes the AoA sliders between prograde and retrograde so that things that fly in rear end first can still take advantage of what aerodynamics they have for their reentry profile.

burn baby burn.

Fast yes, but is it quiet?

I had one of these things just murder my tire a week ago, scariest feeling I've had.

you should do day/year/month just to .... everyone off.

How do you pay a water bill for a planet made entirely out of water?

If you don't mind me asking, what's the word on the TAC release and what do you plan on tackling next?

So I'll just create an umbrella 30 kilometers wide.

Well if you all are going on about names, what about changing it to "Interstellar Lite"? That said after playing this a little bit more I'm warming up a bit more to this, I'm sure I'll start thinking of balance changes once I get bigger fleets going, but other than that I haven't noticed any issues.

Well it's quite simple, if weird things start happening to you and then you disappear never to go back online then we'll know it was in fact slenderman. If not, then it could have just been Jack Skellington scouting out locations for Nightmare before christmas 2

Well if you want my 2 cents, what about having the fusion reactors be superior in both thrust and ISP compared to fission but lacking in electrical since they require power to maintain fusion so while it is generating more power than fission, a high percentage is going back into the fusion reactors thus allowing fission to remain competitive both in initial and fueling cost, power generation, and potentially weight. That way when you go with electrical engines or cheap economy rockets you'll prefer fission over fusion, while grand tour craft with loads of liquid fuel will lean towards fusion; warp capable ships will use antimatter since using it for anything else is overkill both in power usage and how friggin expensive it would be to maintain an antimatter fleet compared to a fleet of fission vessels.

Because he did fall into that pit thanks to it.