bonyetty

Mmmm ok. Lol

I roughly counted 12 fixes out of about 100 new features and parts added only about a week after 1.0. Thanks for the link to support my comments.

Seems from the dev notes over time that the senior developers enjoy building new features but dislike bug fixing. Makes sense why the community managers keep changing, they have to deal with the rage quit rants. Also probably why the port to U5 and PS4 said to be unexpectedly difficult. Face palm not enough time and money to fix the bugs early on but plenty to blow when dealing with them over and over again. Some government must have significant shares in sQUAD.

Indonesian costal flats. A biological hot spot both terrestrial and marine.

Or just zoom out when the tweakable menu is displayed.

Are you playing the latest version of KSP as the drag was increased from in the last few patches of the botched 1.0 release.

What is tip control and how do 6 chutes help?

Yep but the one near the launch pad. Did you try to plant a flag while up there. Did the flag 'blow' the same direction as the one you were standing on? On my attempt yesterday I got distracted testing a Duna rover deployment system.

I had Val standing on the flag pole for a second but couldn't click the surface sample button. Will try again tomoz

I'm go a boot up KSP right now and plant a flag on the flag pole.

Oh Mun arch is close by might wander over and give bill a closer look. 2 hours later wife suggests kids toy auto pilot on the W key and she will let me know when he gets there, while I cook dinner. 45 minutes later "Honey Bills at the arch". Fly Bill up to the top of the arch plant a flag. Wife, "so what do you have to do with Bill now?" Ummm walk him back to his ship. Wife "so what new parts dose that get you? Ummm none. Wife "So what do you get when you plant a flag there?" Ummm a flag on the Mun arch. Wife "do you get money for it?" Nup. Wife ">]¥{>}*|>|> you make me ^}¥{€}£ do that for nuthin?" NO, there is now a flag on one of the Mun arches how cool is that. One more to go.

Nup space time is way harder. It takes closely rotating neutron stars to even put a ripple in space time. Matter is the soft squishy stuff.

Yep sleep mode works a treat. Did for New Horizons and many other RL space craft too.

Im about to head to Duna as I have just finished constructing a 'The Martian' fleet. With the info here will send my scanner sat and test Hab into Dunas atmo with a polar Pe of 12 km. I have a heat sheald and also the Hab positioned where it will hopefully protect the scanner for ore landing sites the DAV will need. Will report back success or fail soon.

I'm very stubbornly precise with my manover nodes yet casual and sloppy with manover burns. Roll circular rockets after launch because it makes no difference to kerbals comfort. Give Kerbals way too much room than they require when building 'efficient' craft. Say 3 2 1 out loud most launches.

All set to borrow my fathers 8 inch telescope but cloudy here in Melbourne Australia.

Appears not to be very popular as cursed says 0 downloads about 30 minutes ago.

Kerbals should go splat!

Now that's a stupid statement. I can speak quite well thank you. Meh. I agree as I have attempted to convey previously but this is a forum thread not a blog. Your previous "better comparison" is just as lacking in a detailed comparison.

Um didn't I accept your pedantic coment and corrected my self with the word primarily. No it's a summary of what I believe the relative developers stated as the primary objectives for their game. It would be silly to think a game would have a single objective. You seem to be implying that. Oh KSP is designed to be accessible therefor applying you pedanticness is not fun and orbiter is designed as hardcore sim and thus the devs had no other objectives including fun. I did not use the word only neither did you. I think both yours and my casual comparisons are fair.

Wrong side of the bed this morning maybe? I am agreeing with you. Sheesh how many qualifiers do you expect in a forum post. I did not say one can't be had without the other, fun and sim. Pedantic in this case IMHO.

Very pedantic regex. Suppose I should have said primarily designed to be a sim or fun. Tis a trait suited to more of a simulation(ish) game I guess.

Orbiter. Download it, play it. Its what you think you want. By the time you have completed a successful orbit and landing your desired mods will be ready and most likely be running on unity 5. I guessing you will be back. KSP designed to be fun where as orbiter designed to be a simulation.

Sorry but have to disagree. The left wangdoodle is the source of the issue.

My suggestion would be to try to tiger it out yourself. The satisfaction will be immense. I found it extremely frustrating and watched Scott Manley and now are a little bit regretfull I did. I recon I could have figured it out, but will never know now. You are almost there one more step. Possibly get a mining base on minimus set up between practicing with cheap probes interplanetary to break up the manover node madness.