Jump to content

toric5

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    579

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by toric5

  1. toric5
    any idea if the mks merge will be save breaking? (will I be able to do a clean upgrade from the current constelation to the future mks)
  2. toric5
    anyone had any issues using this with 1.5?
  3. toric5
    any news on this? Is the conselation release considered 'finished'?
  4. toric5
    Is this compatible with community resource pack? (does it add minable and atmospheric resources where needed?
  5. toric5
    Would it be possible to further integrate this with things from USI-LS (life support recyclers, the really basic greenhouses) and stock modules (stock and third party drills and convers)? I really dotn like how the USI drills and converters need maintenance, but my ISRU magic rock distillery somehow can run forever.
  6. toric5
    I know I could use the wildcard, but I wnated to avoid changing the module name if i didnt have to... I havnt gotten around to playing ksp mutch, dont even have a modded install ATM, but If this works in your game, feel free to PR it. If the patch order is an issue, add more Zs. I dont think it would be good to make this a [FINAL] patch...
  7. toric5
    well, sounds like its time for me to get a 1.3.1 save going then. sounds very odd. @Wyzard, can i get your module manager cache and your .log?
  8. toric5
    Roverdude has a rather excellent Orion drive mod.
  9. toric5
    yes. click the green button that says 'clone or download' and then click 'download ZIP.
  10. toric5
    I thought that was depreciated... if not, ill get a PR up. (just going to pull it from history.)
  11. toric5
    repo, of course.
  12. toric5
    been using the latest release for a bit, and only issue #111 is something we can fix. (we could just run the python on the models) but we should get vens input on that. other than that, everything seems release ready.
  13. toric5
    ahh, ok. i was confused, as none of the configs in the mod used that line... closing my issue on git, then.
  14. toric5
    Is there a way in settings to 'rename' the equipment resource? I am trying to change the equipment resource into matkits, for compatability with MKS. better yet, can we make the resource needed to repair configurable per module/part? that way, you could have a fuel tank that just needs a patch of metal welded on to be repaired, wheras an ISRU may need Machinery (quite hard to manufacture in MKS) to repair.
  15. toric5
    look at his dev thread, already has one: Is WIP.
  16. toric5
    when will it be on git?
  17. toric5
    I installed kerbalism and disabled most of its features, Im only using its backround processing, antenna changes, and reliability models. is there any weirdness i might expect?
  18. toric5
    how would i set up kerbalism so that it leaves life support to MKS, but acts as backround processor, part failure model, science transmission changes(without replacing stock comment for KOSs sake?), and its scripting. what parts of these are possible?
  19. toric5
    HYPE TRAIN COMING THROUGH!
  20. toric5
    would it be possitble to make the probes with RCS on them play a bit nicer with tools like the manuver planner and KER? currently it does not register them as engines (even though i like using them as engines for tiny probes...), making it impossible to really plan manuvers.
  21. toric5
    @SuicidalInsanity, logged a suggestion as a github issue. would be willing to do some .cfg work if i have the time and you like the idea.
  22. toric5
    you are right. funny. It was working a while back, lemme see what i changed. also just realized i forgot to add costs to the patch EDIT: Never mind. its because the patch for adding fuel to the size 2 NTR hasnt been merged yet.
  23. toric5
    nope. leaving that one to someone who can do volume calcs. (you)
  24. toric5
    @Ven, submitted a pull request including the patches i made in my somewhat short lived fork. I did not mean to forcibly take over your work, i (falsely) assumed that your PMs meant that you were indeed done with the mod. Please accept my apology, and I hope I can continue to work with you and other modders where I can.
  25. toric5
    could i get this locked?
×
×
  • Create New...