MR4Y

Also, by logic, a bigger SAS has bigger reaction wheels as well, which also justifies it being heavier.

It might be larger, but it's structure is larger and weights more, since it has to support a larger weight. It makes no logical sense that a part that's bigger weights less.

"Can assign Kerbals to any part of the rocket." How? I'm pretty sure this was dropped.

One. Then I got pissed that it was permadeath and stopped playing the game.

I have 107 hours on it. But I stopped playing it. Waiting for 0.21.

It's just an update. For all we know, it might be just one "meh" feature, a graphic overhaul and a bunch of bugfixes. Sell your plinths.

I wouldn't hold my hopes high up. For all we know, the only updade 0.21 could have is the new VAB/SPH graphics and that's it. And not even this is a guarantee.

I fail to see the utility of a thread just to annouce something that people that were looking at the post where Harv said it know already.

Still not impressed. Let's wait for 0.21 to come out, then we'll see what's what. I don't have orgasms over graphic overhauls to be honest.

A crazy suggestion would be that a saved subassembly could behave like it had a root at each attachment point. Sorta like not making a root to a subassembly, but transforming the whole subassembly into a root.

I haven't played KSP for two days now due to emotional issues.

Have you ever seen any ABY and similar testing having it's critical steps performed by humans? Differences in response of even a milisecond can make all the difference in the end.

So far, it looks like a graphic overhaul and that's it. Not impressed.

Nope. We can't be sure of anything. Human beings can't reproduce any task exatcly the same way twice. And when we talk about computer games, that's worse either.

Since the engines are the same, regardless of mass, smaller is better. Logically speaking, you don't need a TWR of 1 in space, but your maneuvers will take more time to do and you're forced to do 50/50 burns.

That only increases the chance of bigger differences. That's why equipment testing is done by machines.

I enter at about 2 km/s, but at a shallow angle. The parachute explodes, but I can nose in the entry with a fuel tank and engine behind me and nothing happens. If I enter with only the command module's bluent side facing the atmosphere with the ablative shield installed, the module expodes. Considering the "nose" of the module is not shielded, there's something wrong here.

Variances in your piloting for both ships and KSP's wonky physics itself makes this test not valid. Since ferram disaproves the use of Mechjeb for more consistent data results, we are left to wonder what the issue really is.

The problem is how one saves a subassembly while still preseving the attachment points? Cause the difference between the subassembly save and the normal save is that the normal save preserves all it's attachment points. So, the tree structure is not the same, or at least don't behave the same.

I'm facing and issue. I can't enter with the blunt side facing the atmosphere. Whenever I try to place it properly, the ship turns incontrolably and the top part faces the atmosphere. The parachute catches fire and explodes, but I can enter the atmosphere this way and nothing happens. It doesn't even overheat.

Well, considering subassemblies are craft files...

The Cupola might hold only one kerbal, but it's one of the heaviest command pods.

I can't land, rendezvous, dock properly or go to other planets. But I can do proper gravity turns and make rockets with as few parts as possible.

That would only be possible if the game had lagrange points and n-body physics.

You seem to be forgetting some things: -You're standing still when you shoot the portal at the Moon. -It's not known how the little amount of vaccum present in the portal's succion would affect Earth's atmosphere. -Portal technology uses Moon rocks. -It's not known how much time has passed since Chell woke up, so the planet might have different properties. -It's not known if the Combine invasion that takes place in HL 2 altered anything in the planet. It's not specified where Portal's events take place in relation to HL's history. -Considering that Portal technology uses moon rocks, it's not known if the testing suit has different properties or is in fact a modifyied space suit. -Considering that it takes 2.5 seconds for the portal to connect to the moon, it's now known if the delay affects the portal's physics. -This is a game.