Jump to content

TimothyC

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    229

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by TimothyC

  1. TimothyC
    Woomera, we have acquisition of stream.
  2. TimothyC
    What is this? An early stream?
  3. TimothyC
    And here is the NASA AMES study that was the source of the above images
  4. TimothyC
    Those are on the roadmap for an indeterminate time.
  5. TimothyC
    Happy big rockets
  6. TimothyC
    We are go for stream start
  7. TimothyC
    BDB is usually only tested against the latest version of the game, or 1.3.1 at the moment.
  8. TimothyC
    The current Inon engine mount supports both single and double engine operations. The covers that used to exist on the double engine mounts for single engine ops are not there any more, and vice versa (I should log an issue on the github for this), but you can use it for both versions. Also, the B version does fit under the Inon decoupler.
  9. TimothyC
    You spin me right 'round baby right 'round....
  10. TimothyC
    I haven't played with NF or SSPxR in a while, but I do say, I love the parts and IVAs.
  11. TimothyC
    An evolved J-2, such as is seen in ETS by the mid-late 1990s.
  12. TimothyC
    @damonvv, @CobaltWolf asked me to tag you. We're live
  13. TimothyC
    We are go for Launch
  14. TimothyC
    We are go for hot fire test (Stream)
  15. TimothyC
    I place an octo2 on a cubic strut between the two OMS engines, and I angle it to 15 degrees. I also have an action group set up to control from this point. The goal is to have it thrust through the CoM, and have the probe lined up with the CoT. This goes roughly where the drogue is on the Mk2 orbiter, so I place said 'chute on probe to help hide it.
  16. TimothyC
    We are go for Dev Stream
  17. TimothyC
    We have a stream! With maybe some game play later.
  18. TimothyC
    BDB Fun:
  19. TimothyC
    Come join Akron's stream!
  20. TimothyC
    The final/definitive version of the LRBs modeled here (the late 1990s saw flyback LRBs proposed, but did not receive the serious consideration the earlier ones from the 1988-1991 time period received) called for a production run of 28 LRBs per year (14 flights per year was considered the post-Challenger max), with no reuse as it wasn't cost effective. Economies of production were expected to drive costs down (28 tank sets and 113 STME/RS-68 analogs per year lets you set up a true assembly line).
  21. TimothyC
    Remember to delete the cached parts config.
  22. TimothyC
    As you have discovered, the hatch on the airlock is located on the end of the part and is axial relative to the part's orientation.
  23. TimothyC
    The fact is, Cobalt doesn't like large SOFI covered tanks, hence no Delta IV.
  24. TimothyC
    The Castor-30 that Antares uses is already included in the mod. For the Antares first stages, that would require parts that are not on the BDB roadmap at this time. Edit: Well, sort of. The NK-33 engines would have about the same amount of thrust as the E-1s would have, and there is 2.5m tankage on the roadmap (for Kolyma's Shadow's Miranda launcher).
  25. TimothyC
    It is new, and offers a proper base for a 1.875m docking port. It also works as a good MOL/MOS adapter.
×
×
  • Create New...