r4pt0r

i support this, and propose it extends to almost all planets. a green pixel or 4 for jool, so on and so on.

on that orbital view look at the mun relative to ksc. its closer to the horizon than minmus is. orbital pic does match up.

when a mission to eeloo can take 3 years i must disagree.

ideally this asteroid addition means they will add a part called a landing spike, that roots you to the ground of whatever you're on.

OP's first post is a kluster-wreck lol. but anywho 1. theres confusion as to your meaning on the ladders. please post again. 2. i can only assume that you want a accurate topographical map of the asteroid nasa intends on lassoing, as the game planets dont actualy exist. as to the asteroid i don't believe they have scanned it in a manner to have a topography type map. 3. as to extra solar systems i point you to this month old article http://www.pcgamer.com/2013/12/23/kerbal-space-program-dev-on-random-solar-systems-the-joy-of-failure-and-the-cult-of-steam/ 4. yes SQUAD really rocks (or asteroids for that matter)

ive seen mods that scales the size of the communotrons up, i feel the same principal would work for your endevor. someone will inevitably do it if it isnt hardcoded.

yeah that or a monolith with all the winners names somewhere?

i agree this should be stock.

i really feel the devs could be better suited spending time on something else. this really seems like a mod kind of thing.

it seems to me that russia is docking things together that were all orgininaly launched from earth. your point is invalid.

while we can all hope and pray that orbital/extra-planetary construction is never added to the game (other than docking things originating from kerbin surface of course), id like to mention that while ksp may have an economy in the future, it should not be an economic simulator. it is a space sim/game.

precisely why i don't have kethane installed. I'm glad the devs shelved resources so that their time can be better spent on the actual game.

"Kerbol (officially called the Sun, and also known as the Star) is the central star of the Kerbol System." -KSP wiki your fake name is invalidated. inb4 "but anyone can edit a wiki"

>miner why is every one so keen on mining and resources? i think its entirely unreasonable to add a game-play mechanic in our space sim that no real nation has even remotely attempted. part of the challenge is navigating the system using only kerbin originating fuel. that necessitates mission planning and sending orbital refueling stations to other bodies. does it not put anyone else off that we are supposed to be able to mine raw rocket-fuel presumably less than 50 yards underground on foreign planets and moons using very portable parts?

Daily reminder that the sun in KSP is called the sun. thats also why solar panels arent called kerbolar panels too.

every DR.1 triplane has the same flight envelope/charecteristics. as would every Albatros D.III

lemnon kerman. after being the first kerbal to the mun, and the first kerbal to minmus, i planted a flag on the top of the mountain in the middle of the below pictured ocean crater and named it Mt.Lemnon

@8000m/s you aren't docking with anything lol

im saying that a pilot cannot change the stats of a craft. 2 kerbals in 2 copies of the exact same ship should have the exact same flight characteristics. one wouldnt be stronger because an engineer is onboard. that makes no sense. one ship wouldnt turn faster because one kerbal has more flight points or whatever you want. cuz that would not make sense. both would have the same parts and by extension the same abilities.

its just the name brah. kerbals have no different sexes, theres no need for it. they poof into spores when they die, thats how i like to think they reproduce.

you're implying that we dont play as jeb or whoever is in command module? that in truth we are ksc just giving commands to distant kerbals? that i cant agree with. also having james kerman on my ship should not magicaly raise my reaction wheel torque, just as having millie kerman should not make my ship more impact resistant. its about designing your ship better. half the game is in the VAB. add another reaction wheel if its a big ship. add banks of them if you want. If edison were alive today his lighbulbs wouldnt be any more efficient than mine if we had the same lightbulbs. although he would probably try to steal my un-patented idea for electronic socks...

this guy gets it. the joke would be that it doesnt start with a k.

this is exactly what i dont like about the idea. if i just floor my cars gas pedal, i better have the same acceleration as if the stig did the same motions. >this is assuming its an automatic car

maybe only a visible slight fog, to represent sublimation. very faint, and dont let it effect gameplay at all. only graphicaly.

lol and vexx posted and missed it. oh well, even jeb makes mistakes sometimes.