Jump to content

Bloody_looser

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    365

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Bloody_looser

  1. Bloody_looser
    @psvialli Yup, you can. All the mod's mechanics can be tweaked / turned off at the Space Centre screen, click the USI LS icon there.
  2. Bloody_looser
    After directly referencing the bn_upperJaw01 bone via debug for the props, they equipped properly on the female kerbal in the new suit. For male kerbals they work as is. Kinda strange. The mod describes the parts in such fashion.
  3. Bloody_looser
    Hi, @IgorZ I've run into an issue while using the glorious Kerbal Hacks KIS addon. When trying to equip anything head-related (like glasses, headset etc.) on female Kerbals, sporting the new suit, KSP throws in log 'Error: evaTransform not found' and nothing happens. With the old suit everything works as designed. Hand-held items work with both suits. For male Kerbals everything works with both suits as well.
  4. Bloody_looser
    Nvm, was too long away from KSP and should've read changelogs. Keep up the great work.
  5. Bloody_looser
    Ow, yiss. Fair enough, I guess. Using more than a year-worth amount of depleted fuel to produce less than the smallest xenon can fit is not a very utilizable mechanic though.
  6. Bloody_looser
    @Nils277, drill for dirt cfg has a wrong path for the model (in 1.5.3 at least). Btw, would you consider adding base-size KIS containers (10k large and 5k small), since to produce something kinda big - like a drill - one have to rely on third-party containers. Also, what about adding small xenon output as a by-product for reactor operation?
  7. Bloody_looser
    What if introduction of the EVA navball itself was also a bug in the first place?
  8. Bloody_looser
    Nah, that's not long. The very best inflammatory topics used to get tens of pages in a day. Lack of any explanation for the point, made by the OP, however, makes me suspect the same.
  9. Bloody_looser
    Seeing this GIF on the Internets.
  10. Bloody_looser
    Finally, a mod crucial for my gameplay. Thank you, sir. UPD. @Enceos, Mic headset is missing a category in cfg.
  11. Bloody_looser
    Many ITT are badmouthing Flying Tiger, that's not fair. FT should get some credit. When SQUAD announced making ports for console, the community was really sceptical about it. While some were outright hostile, waving around "PCmasterrace" agenda, and others expected an outright fraud, the majority was sceptical about the very possibility of porting KSP to consoles. The modern consoles are nothing more than a really average PC with restrictions and licensing, and such a complex resource-hungry (and not very optimized) game like KSP is not the simplest stuff to port. So, KSP console port was expected to fail and fail miserably. Flying Tiger however managed to pull off the port kinda well. Yes, the port failed as expected, but in a good way. A couple of game breaking bugs is really far from the expected full-blown disaster.
  12. Bloody_looser
    Check this out. It's really old, but still rocks.
  13. Bloody_looser
    Cheaters will rejoice? Or there's some deeper meaning?
  14. Bloody_looser
    Welcome back.
  15. Bloody_looser
    I like the upgrade feature, hopefully it'll make into stock. It'll definitely add depth for building craft series and generations. Since it's tied to .craft file, there's no problem with craft-sharing too. Some decals (like a letter in the model number or smth) for upgraded engines would be nice though, to cut the guesswork on the screenshot - whether it's a simple LVN or 'Legendary LVN of Mighty Thrust'.
  16. Bloody_looser
    Lol, in the first screen it looks like the dish's overheating.
  17. Bloody_looser
    Any news on 'Part Upgrade' thingie yet?
  18. Bloody_looser
    Try asking in this thread, current one is a bit too old.
  19. Bloody_looser
    IMO it'll just create clutter on screen. Those who care about funds/reusability land at KSC. Those, who always land at other side of the planet will see like 20% recover value. And so what? Not recover the wreck craft?
  20. Bloody_looser
    TL;DR version: Looks like SQUAD finally pulling off the fraud to steal my five bucks I've paid several years ago. Or maybe not.
  21. Bloody_looser
    Nope. There's such part over there though.
  22. Bloody_looser
    Well, body lift is bugged in 1.1.2 and it's missing actually. 200 funds is a way too large sum? IMO Mk2 short's cost is totally fine, since it sturdier, has better heat tolerance and provides lift - well, supposed to. With all that features it's just 0,04 tons heavier than mk1 - it's weight of two LV-1 engines. Everything seems balanced enough.
  23. Bloody_looser
    It provides body lift, and it is an advantage. If you look closer at the model you'll see it's mk1 tank in a structural fuselage.
  24. Bloody_looser
    You've made me question that. Moar nodes point still stands though.
  25. Bloody_looser
    @Nils277, FYI @RoverDude's Malemute rover geology lab still doesn't fit into the garage. Edit: Nevermind I screwed-up installation somehow. Also, can we have moar attachment nodes on the inside of the garage?
×
×
  • Create New...