CleverLikeMe Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 I've had some issues using mechjeb ascent guidance. Anyone else having this issue? Didn't have a problem with the stock system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasml Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 I want to look at changing this with something like Custom Asteroids Mod (if it still works)FYI - Custom Asteroids seems to be working in 1.0.2 - would be interesting going after asteroids in the leading and trailing Lagrange points of Kerbins gas giant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillAshley Posted May 5, 2015 Author Share Posted May 5, 2015 *snip*So thaks for taking the time and letting me know dude, feedback like this is very important so lets adress the issues:Ok SO! i did a fresh ksp install to check out whats happening, and yes i did indeed screw up Serran's atmosphere. It should have 0.4 atm pressure ASL, but it seems i have got it confused with Sonnah as it seems to share the same stats. I'll fix this immediately.As far as the greatly reduced science science goes, I spoke about this earlier:The problem i have with Minmus, is that it's too easy to pillage for science. During early game, I'd send ship after ship draining all science i can from that small low grav world, with little to no effort at all, and by the end of it the tech tree was (almost) complete! IMHO it ruined things for me, even though it was my fault for doing it, I could never resist the temptation of sending just one more ship to unlock the next node....So when i set out to make New Horizons, i wanted to create a challenge that I didn't find in the stock game. I wanted a completely new experience, one where I would have to work for my upgrades. I can understand this pack isn't for everyone, as every has different tastes, but for those looking for a better challenge and more variety should have a look.The old way always left me feeling overpowered when i went to new planets, I wanted something that would challenge me, force me to make do with just a few parts for an Eve probe, make me improvise a lander for Duna. I took time creating a curve-based science mulitplier system, and adding a modifier for difficulty of reaching/landing on each body. True you can still grind away all the science at the KSC and I'm certainly not going to stop you, but the intention behind everything is that you need to challenge yourself to making do with what you have to explore the system. oh, and Kerbin will get you the LEASt amount of science in the system, you do get more from sonnah/mun/aptur/serran, but not alot more. Perhaps i can release an alternate config option, leaving science based on the stock way if you really want. Although you will be incredibly overpowered really fast. Let me know what you think.I've had some issues using mechjeb ascent guidance. Anyone else having this issue? Didn't have a problem with the stock system.I have heard there was issues with mechjeb previously, was hoping it was because of a conflict or a bad previous version. Unfortunately I've never used it, so I wouldn't know what the issues mean. That being said, what exactly is the issue you're having?FYI - Custom Asteroids seems to be working in 1.0.2 - would be interesting going after asteroids in the leading and trailing Lagrange points of Kerbins gas giant.Sweeeeeeet, I'll get onto it soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddiew Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Exciting looking mod, I shall give this a go when I get home tonight I feel like I've read somewhere that attempts to make Kerbin a moon used to cause orbiting ships to disappear - is that no longer a thing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillAshley Posted May 5, 2015 Author Share Posted May 5, 2015 Used to yes, stand alone kopernicus fixed this issue I'd probably wait till tomorrow if I were you. I''ve found a few problems with atmospheres but need to wait till I finish work before I can upload the new update Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Augustus_ Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Please add that red giant Kerbol as an option and I will download this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillAshley Posted May 5, 2015 Author Share Posted May 5, 2015 Lol you're persistant with the red giant, ay? it's easy enough to do, the only issue would be the size/luminosity of the giant. I'd have to shift all the orbits out, and then write a solar power curve that takes into account the suns light...I'll have a look into it, but at the moment the issue with atmospheres needs fixing ASAP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoloYolo Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Lol you're persistant with the red giant, ay? it's easy enough to do, the only issue would be the size/luminosity of the giant. I'd have to shift all the orbits out, and then write a solar power curve that takes into account the suns light...I'll have a look into it, but at the moment the issue with atmospheres needs fixing ASAPI was thinking maybe, just maybe a comet or two. I would pay you (with a download) and do anything related with this mod. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillAshley Posted May 5, 2015 Author Share Posted May 5, 2015 I actually had an idea for a sub-mod. Like a New Horizons minor bodies pack, designed to work for NH.The idea is on the backburner though, until I'm done polishing the main mod. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptRobau Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 You can remove your SolarPowerCurve cfg as since 1.01 solar power is done without power curves Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillAshley Posted May 5, 2015 Author Share Posted May 5, 2015 Awesome, didn't really check that out at all, cheers!It'll be gone in the next update which should have atmospheres with correct pressure/temp curves I left put of the initial 1.0 release. Hopefully I can get it done tomorrow, depending on any issues I find along the way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therlun Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 (edited) it seems i have got it confused with Sonnah as it seems to share the same stats. That's one thing I forgot to mention. I think renaming some of the planets to make the names less similar would help. Planets should not have the same starting letter and the same number of syllables at the same time. Sonnah and Serran, Laythe and Lave, Arin and Atell being the main offenders. I would also change either Moh or Moho a bit. I get that one is the planet and the other is the moon, but it still slightly distracting since that particular planet/moon naming scheme is only used that once.With enough play-time that effect will diminish and the player will have memorized it, but it does make getting into the new solar system more difficult. oh, and Kerbin will get you the LEASt amount of science in the system, you do get more from sonnah/mun/aptur/serran, but not alot more. Are you sure about Kerbin giving the least amount of science? According to my campaign experience and the .cfgs of Aptur and NH_VanillaScienceOverwrite it doesn't.Aptur Kerbin landedDataValue = 0.71 landedDataValue = 0.83inSpaceLowDataValue = 0.6 inSpaceLowDataValue = 0.7inSpaceHighDataValue = 0.56 inSpaceHighDataValue = 0.66recoveryValue = 0.71 recoveryValue = 0.83That's what I mean when I said Aptur and the Mun are a waste of time. A surface sample from Aptur is worth notably less than one from Kerbin's grasslands (0.71 for Aptur, 0.83 for Kerbin). The Mun has almost the same data values as Kerbin, but is much more difficult to reach and return from.My larger point is that there should be a remote connection between the difficulty and the science reward.Another example: Leaving Sonnah's SOI and just doing high orbit science around the Sun (high space datavalue 13) gives twenty times the yield of the Mun. Which is in no relation to the effort/technology it requires to achieve. Just one trip out of Sonnah's SOI (without returning) will yield as much ore more science than thoroughly scouring (including landings and return trips) the Mun, Aptur and Serran combined.Concerning the science issue the mod has one overarching problem IMO: There is a conflict between the starting position and the need to balance it.Placing Kerbin as a moon around a gas giant with several other moons makes the start more diverse and broadens the early game. It does make the start tougher and more interesting for sure. But the large reduction in science yields for those other moons makes it less rewarding and interesting at the same time as well, running directly against the reason to implement the new start to begin with. One of these issues has to be addressed in an extensive way to bring out the full potential of the mod in my opinion. It is also worth keeping in mind that nerfing science yields has a lessened effect with the new processing lab, which allows you to generate infinite science anywhere if you really want it.The easiest fix would be to remove one of the moons of Sonnah and up the science yield of the other two. But that would make it similar to the normal start again, with Kerbin and two moons, just slightly different in that all three are orbiting around Sonnah.As an extreme solution I would change the starting position of Kerbin in a more drastic way again. I would have some suggestions here, but I don't just want to come barging into the thread and knocking over all your work for the sake of perceived balance.I really enjoy the mod. The changed solar system was what I was looking for. So I indeed hope all my criticisms come across as feedback from an interested player and not as pure complaints. Have fun and thanks again for all your effort. Edited May 6, 2015 by Therlun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillAshley Posted May 6, 2015 Author Share Posted May 6, 2015 *snip*i see where you're coming from, don't worry I'm not taking it as an attack. Balance is something i really want for the system and there's still a lot of work to do to get it right. Feedback is probably the only way I'm finding these errors atm, as with working full time, the time i spend fixing the mod, and other IRL stuff leaves me no time to play the game to find these issues.I had a look at the configs and yeah it seems i have mixed up my numbers somewhere, the spreadsheet i used to calculate everything has quite a few different multipliers...I'll have to go back to my spreadsheet and make some changes to the science again and try to find where things went wrong.How would you best suggest the tweaking of the numbers? obviously raising the starting moons to a higher touch. Maybe I should raise the whole scale which i based my numbers on to a slightly higher level, leaving the curve as you branch outwards through the system. Basically the way i made the scale, planets had an initial multiplier (Kerin was supposed to have 0.5/Sonnah was supposed to be 1 but that seems to not be right/laythe is 5) and then had a difficulty multiplier affecting it, then the modifiers for the different sciences (low/high space, landed, etc.) leaving the final numbers. I'll delay the atmosphere update i was going to release today to go over these numbers more and see how it goes.Haha I think I'm too used to the names, really. They mainly got named back when i was just creating random planets to learn how it's done, way before i attempted a coherent system. Most of them are named after descriptive words i used for them (Ernus=Infernus/Arin=Arid/Derso=desolate) There are a few exceptions, like Lave was named after a argument with my housemate who called it the 'lavender colored planet', and Serran used to be a moon of a planet i ended up scrapping called Terran. Then theres Atell & Eli which used to be in a binary orbit at Vanor, which looked like an old RT setup i had, I called them sATELLite/satELIte. I can see there can be some confusion about the names but I'm extremely bad at naming things, suggest a few names and I'll probably change them Ideally i'd rename Lave, don't quite know about the others, but if things get suggested that fit well I won't turn them down! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolves_Hero Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 (edited) I went to Serran planet but aero brake way too quick from 2300m/s to 15m/s in 1 sec on 50,000m ... broken parts on top. Serran bug or too much air pressure just 17 atm.PresMat Barometer I found 1atm on 50999m in 1 sec then 1500atm on surface holy crap lol.I alway aero brake with atmosphere planets slow down make orbit. Edited May 6, 2015 by Wolves_Hero Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillAshley Posted May 7, 2015 Author Share Posted May 7, 2015 yeah sorry, atmospheres are a bit buggy atm, I've almost got them perfected for the next update but for now thay are a little screwed up. I somehow mixed up serran's atmosphere and gave it 17 atm pressure asl when it's supposed to have 0.4. The barometer readouts always show 100x the atmosphere now, kerbain now says 100 asl. hopefully i can upload the new updated versions today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddiew Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 Used to yes, stand alone kopernicus fixed this issue I'd probably wait till tomorrow if I were you. I''ve found a few problems with atmospheres but need to wait till I finish work before I can upload the new updateAwesome stuff, thanks for the reassurance Finally got time to take a proper look and this planet pack is beautiful indeed ^^ Love the decision to make Laythe an inner planet - makes much more sense as a warm ocean world, and tingles my classic-sci-fi expectations of Venus before it was radar mapped.And at last, Dres is not a lonely potato! Does it still have procedural asteroids? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillAshley Posted May 7, 2015 Author Share Posted May 7, 2015 Thanks mate. to be honest I've been too busy trying to configure the atmospheres properly to see if dress has it's asteroids yeah the idea of laythe was exactly the same as yours, it seemed way more fitting to be an inner planet rather than an outer one...it just needed a little moon to keep it company I'll have the proper atmosphere setting done very soon, got a bit behind it due to work and other IRL stuff. At the moment ships grind to a halt as soon as they hit the outer atmosphere, which is pretty bad lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddiew Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 ...it just needed a little moon to keep it company The moon for an oxygen atmosphere planet is actually very inline with current thinking; it regulates the axial tilt of the parent and provides tides to stir up the ocean currents, both of which are massive boons to living critters It may not be within your reach, but a tad more land area on Laythe wouldn't go amiss, if that's possible/easy? It was always a bit of a struggle to hit those little islands when using FAR (no trajectory predictions) and 1.0.2 kind of pushes towards that same scenario... Don't know whether it'd be as simple as dropping the sea level by a few percent, depending on the landscaping under the surface? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillAshley Posted May 7, 2015 Author Share Posted May 7, 2015 it's doable, but i'd need to custom edit the heightmap to provide more land mass, then do the texturing behind it. If you read the to-do list in the OP I'm actually considering overhauling all stock bodies alternis-kerbol style, but thats once this is nice and stable and balanced which is more important for now!I'm uploading another build now that (hopefully) fixes the issues with the atmospheres of the custom worlds....stops you insta-exploding when entering the atmosphere. Still got a lot of work to do with it, but its a small step forward at least. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddiew Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 Ok, good stuff - quite understand the priority decisions, always go for stability before frills Will pick up the new build after work tonight, thanks for sorting it out so fast ^^(I haven't even started a career since 1.0, so from my personal perspective you can go ahead and take aaaalll the time you need xD)Oh, yeah, meant to ask; is there any kind of delta-v map for New Horizons? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillAshley Posted May 7, 2015 Author Share Posted May 7, 2015 haha its not 100% yet, drag is still a little over the top...but hopefully it stops ships insta-exploding during reentry, which is a good thing hopefully! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillAshley Posted May 7, 2015 Author Share Posted May 7, 2015 Update 1.4.1 live on curseforgeFixed Serran's atmospheric pressure from being 18atm back to 0.4atmTweaked Serran's texture & normals slightlyChanged all atmospheres to a better curve to (hopefully) stop instantly overheating shipsAltered Sonnah system's science levels to a better starting position (more balance needed in future) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ITAsimo456 Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 Don't use KSPRC, it's outdated, it glitched my game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillAshley Posted May 7, 2015 Author Share Posted May 7, 2015 yes, it hasn't been updated yet for 1.0, there are ways to get ksprc working though if you read the ksprc thread. I'd remove the link, but there are still ways to get it installed so it's better to leave it for people that have installed it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddiew Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 Not sure if this is your realm or Kopernicus', but I get very funny effects when flying near Sonnah... I can only zoom into my ship at 5x timewarp or higher - at 1x it sort of runs away from the camera along a diagonal path towards the top right of the screen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.