munlander1 Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Just now, TheEpicSquared said: notamod Probably, but it'd be hard to tell. /notamod Why are you commenting if your not a mod. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sal_vager Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Perhaps a sly admission of guilt at liking his own posts from a secret non square and mundane account? But yes some people have done that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frybert Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 45 minutes ago, munlander1 said: Has anyone made a separate account to like their own posts? Yes. Other nefarious reasons as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munlander1 Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 17 minutes ago, Frybert said: Yes. Other nefarious reasons as well. How were they caught? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEpicSquared Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 32 minutes ago, sal_vager said: Perhaps a sly admission of guilt at liking his own posts from a secret non square and mundane account? But yes some people have done that. Naw, I'm clean. A simple square wouldn't do something so terrible, would he? (Well, I did once get a minor warning for using asterisks in place of a swear word in my location, so I guess nobody's safe ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deddly Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 1 hour ago, munlander1 said: How were they caught? Easy, we just [redacted], usually taking a few [redacted]. Works great if you add a squeeze of lemon juice too, because [redacted] tentacles and [redacted] of doom. We're all gonna die Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munlander1 Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Nice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spacetraindriver Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 How exactly do these rank..."Dots" work? Is it based on rep or something else? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Rocket Scientist Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 2 hours ago, Spacetraindriver said: How exactly do these rank..."Dots" work? Is it based on rep or something else? Post count. I don't know the thresholds, but its definitely post count. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legoclone09 Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 Hmm... based on how I act on the forums how do I qualify to be a moderator? If I did ever want to be a moderator I would have to actually post in the KSP-related areas, though, not just The Lounge and Kerbal Network. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanamonde Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 The parts of the forum you frequent isn't relevant. I myself hardly ever go to the modding subs, since I prefer to play stock and so am not very familiar with the questions and situations which can arise there, which is alright since there are several moderators who are heavily into mods and very familiar with that kind of thing. So as always, the requirements are 1) over 18, 2) fairly clean warn history, 3) helpful attitude, 4) good communicator. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkOwl57 Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 Why'd you guys change up the forum guidelines? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deddly Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 4 minutes ago, DarkOwl57 said: Why'd you guys change up the forum guidelines? The guidelines were a bit unclear on a few points for everyone, including moderators. Hopefully it's better now. It's all in the announcement, really: "We hope that these new guidelines will make it easier for regular users to understand what is appropriate conduct for our community and for moderators to moderate in moderation." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cratercracker Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 What does this ''balls'' mean (those under user's name) P.s-(lol i got 2 balls)(gets banned)(no really i just had to do this pun,forgive me pls) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkOwl57 Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 1 minute ago, cratercracker said: What does this ''balls'' mean (those under user's name) On 2/26/2017 at 3:15 PM, Mad Rocket Scientist said: Post count. I don't know the thresholds, but its definitely post count. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deddly Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 A few posts moved into a separate thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
passinglurker Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Can we add excessive use of caps lock to the forum rules please? Now that the dev's set the example it's gonna open the flood gates to click baity thread titling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deddly Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 @passinglurker we try to aim less for oppression and more for protection, reactive rather than proactive, if you know what I mean? You're referring to something that has happened one time. Imagine if we were to add a rule each time someone does something we don't like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted March 3, 2017 Author Share Posted March 3, 2017 Are reaction images not banned anymore? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diomedea Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 17 hours ago, Dman979 said: Are reaction images not banned anymore? They aren't listed anymore as a specific item in the rules (which is actually better IMHO, too many had different ideas of what a reaction image is). That means images appropriate to a ongoing discussion won't be questioned anymore for possible application of a rule that was never intended to curtail all ways of expressing a legitimate viewpoint in pictures. If the content isn't appropriate to a discussion, all of the rules in section 2.2. "Forbidden Content" apply to images too. What is objectionable with reaction images is actually described in those rules, e.g. 2.2.d about rudeness or harassment, or 2.2.m about unnecessarily boosting post counts, with something that does not contribute in any way and actually distracts from the true subject in a thread (if not even worse). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted March 3, 2017 Author Share Posted March 3, 2017 So, a simple image response (with no other text) is now OK? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diomedea Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Could be OK if appropriate to a ongoing discussion, e.g. it helps others understand a concept. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frybert Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 1 hour ago, Dman979 said: So, a simple image response (with no other text) is now OK? They are no longer banned outright. Just use common sense and don't over do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deddly Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 No outright ban on reaction images... http://giphy.com/gifs/party-EMagb4SC9LAU8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted March 3, 2017 Author Share Posted March 3, 2017 MRW reaction images are allowed https://i.imgur.com/hHuNlPM.mp4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.