Jump to content

Do YOU use mods??


KSP FAN5000

Do you use mods?  

232 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you use mods I do :3

    • Yes, Always
      179
    • Yes, Sometimes
      41
    • No, Never
      14


Recommended Posts

Kerbal Engineer and Docking Alignment Indicator are mandatory. Depending on my mood and the complexity of a mission, I also add MechJeb once in a while. However, I played two years (don't ask me how many hours) using only stock in order to learn the basics. Oh and Chatterer, I turn that one on from time to time just for the fun of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kerbal Engineer, SCANsat, and Toolbar.  I occasionally use HyperEdit, but only in sandbox, never in career.

I find that a good way to run "simulations" on a career craft is to copy the craft file over to my sandbox game and then HyperEdit to the destination body.  Real-life spacecraft engineers run copious simulations, such as wind tunnel and computer simulations, so this is my KSP equivalent.

I would like to try some of the mods that make KSP prettier, but I need to upgrade my computer first.  :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/6/2016 at 2:04 PM, Diche Bach said:

So quick question to anyone watching this thread who uses lots of mods: do you notice appreciable performance degradation associated with using mods?

Expand  

Yes. Part mods usually have little effect other than longer load times and more memory used. Plugin mods vary from "negligible effect" to "slows the game down unacceptably". VFX mods can have a big effect, especially if your video card is weak. Other plugins depend on the complexity of what they add and how well they're coded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/6/2016 at 2:10 PM, Red Iron Crown said:

Yes. Part mods usually have little effect other than longer load times and more memory used. Plugin mods vary from "negligible effect" to "slows the game down unacceptably". VFX mods can have a big effect, especially if your video card is weak. Other plugins depend on the complexity of what they add and how well they're coded.

Expand  

Wouldn't it be _AWESOME!_ if Squad did on their end what they could reasonably do to mitigate these issues?

It is a bit puzzling to hear your prognosis though. I'd say most of my mods are either parts mods (the USI pack, InterstellarExtended, the NearFutures set, etc., KW_Rocketry), or what I'd call "widgets" for lack of a better word (e.g., Chatterer, biomatic, that sort of thing, even MechJeb I suppose). Only VFX I run that I am aware of is Scatterer. Then there is TweakScale, which I suspect is the main culprit for my performance issues, and is in sort of a class by itself I suppose.

I see my biggest performance issues when large complex ship designing is involved, not in situations where I'd think Scatterer would cause problems (e.g., while in flight on Kerbin).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/6/2016 at 2:59 PM, Diche Bach said:

Wouldn't it be _AWESOME!_ if Squad did on their end what they could reasonably do to mitigate these issues?

Expand  

They do, and have.

  1 minute ago, Diche Bach said:

It is a bit puzzling to hear your prognosis though. I'd say most of my mods are either parts mods (the USI pack, InterstellarExtended, the NearFutures set, etc., KW_Rocketry), or what I'd call "widgets" for lack of a better word (e.g., Chatterer, biomatic, that sort of thing, even MechJeb I suppose). Only VFX I run that I am aware of is Scatterer. Then there is TweakScale, which I suspect is the main culprit for my performance issues, and is in sort of a class by itself I suppose.

Expand  

USI and Interstellar both include plugins, they're not purely part packs and add new mechanics. All those "widgets" add a bit of load, in aggregate this can be significant. Tweakscale shouldn't be very performance heavy.

  1 minute ago, Diche Bach said:

I see my biggest performance issues when large complex ship designing is involved, not in situations where I'd think Scatterer would cause problems (e.g., while in flight on Kerbin).

Expand  

Large, complex ships are going to hurt performance no matter what you do. In a modded install you can mitigate it to some degree by closing delta-V windows in KER or MechJeb, this will keep the vessel simulation for delta-V from running.

Really though, you should do some testing with individual mods to find what is causing the biggest performance hits for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say that B-9 Aerospace, while their parts are amazing, is one of the biggest performance hitters due to the fact that their textures are large and unoptimized. Hasn't stopped me from getting it though. The HX parts can let you build awesome spaceships, especially when used in conjunction with Lack Luster Labs for adding detail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I use mods. Here's a partial list to what I use and why:

  • Kerbal Engineer Redux: it provides a wealth of information on craft performance that the stock game does not provide.
  • MechJeb2: I use it to master new KSP skills. Right now, I am using it as a means of perfecting planned landings near the KSP. In the past, I have used it to learn how to dock, how to plan for rendezvous, and various orbits, such as polar, 45 degree, etc.
  • Planetary Base: It does more than just provide neat parts for planetary bases. I've even used it for ship superstructure...
  • @Fengist's Sink It! and Maritime Pack: Both mods have made a lot of craft out of these two mods.
  • Environmental Visual Enhancements (by @rbray89): Nothing says making perfect Kerbin skies like this mod. Although I do like the older version that had heavier clouds...

There are more mods I use, but mainly to fill niches I feel the game is missing. I'm getting a new laptop in February and will add a few more mods.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/6/2016 at 2:59 PM, Diche Bach said:

Wouldn't it be _AWESOME!_ if Squad did on their end what they could reasonably do to mitigate these issues?

Expand  

Optimising the API, cleaning up old cruft and adding new better ways has been included in more or less ever devnote and every release.

(Possibly because almost every dev at Squad also moonlights as modder :wink: ).

Edit: But no matter what they do, the quality of each mod is up to the author and noone else.

Edited by Curveball Anders
clarity
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/6/2016 at 3:05 PM, Red Iron Crown said:

They do, and have.

USI and Interstellar both include plugins, they're not purely part packs and add new mechanics. All those "widgets" add a bit of load, in aggregate this can be significant. Tweakscale shouldn't be very performance heavy.

Large, complex ships are going to hurt performance no matter what you do. In a modded install you can mitigate it to some degree by closing delta-V windows in KER or MechJeb, this will keep the vessel simulation for delta-V from running.

Really though, you should do some testing with individual mods to find what is causing the biggest performance hits for you.

Expand  

So far I've tested about 50 of the 76 I had installed and seeing a progressive degradation of performance (slower loads, slower scene changes, progressively higher "idling" RAM usage [idling meaning, just sitting there look at a blank canvas in the VAB and alt-tabbing out to have a look at Task Manager . . . all very scientific stuff, using the "one-one-thousand, two-one-thousand, . . ." MkII timer mechanism . . .) I'm pretty sure several of those ones in that last set of ~26 will have to be left for a future more-RAM augmented rig :(

The basic method I've been following and the data I've collected:

1. copied my old GameData folder and renamed it GameData6Sept2016

2. copied the Squad folder and created a new GameData folder and plopped Squad into it.\

3. Launched game and collected a few "eyeball" measures of performance indicators, then closed game.

4. Add a couple mods (ones I feel are absolutely "essential" to me enjoying the game) and repeat step three.

Here is what I've got so far (when I say "Mode Switch" what I really should say is "Scene Change")

  Reveal hidden contents

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use a LOT of mods. I use planet packs almost all the time because I've gone everywhere in the stock system quite a lot and whilst I will still never get bored of sending missions to places like Duna or the Jool system, I like to have much more variety than the few planets provided in the stock game. I use a lot of parts mods because I design vehicles mainly for aesthetic purposes and that's somewhat difficult with stock parts. And of course, I use a couple of utility mods (MechJeb, Kerbal Alarm Clock, Editor Extensions Redux, etc) to enhance my gameplay experience and also in some cases my screenshot taking abilities (particularly with MechJeb because I can set up a rocket to launch autonomously and then get screenshots at all the critical moments in flight).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kerbal Engineer

Hyperedit (for testing purposes, not during "real" missions)

Scatterer (for pretty stuff)

Environmental Visual Enhancements/EVE (for pretty stuff)

Thinking about adding distant object Visual enhancement

Atomic Age pack - installed but I don't really use it as I like to have my designs mostly stock, the nuclear lightbulb seems OPd (full scale performance in a 1/10th scale system)

For now: Kerbal Research and Development - just trying it out for fun... but it makes parts pretty OPd after a few upgrades. I'll scrub it later.

 

Personal Mods:

A planet I call "Rald", with Duna as its moon, Ike moved to Sun-Kerbin Pseudo L4

2 dwarf planets to keep dres company: Pact and Vot modeled after Pallas and Vesta

Ballast tanks

Ducted electric fans

Air augmented rockets/ ramrockets/turborockets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/4/2016 at 10:12 PM, Diche Bach said:

Do you suffer performance issues?

Expand  

The game hasn't slowed noticeably but I've cut maybe 10fps off the space centre screen compared to what I would get playing stock, and the initial game loading takes 4–6 minutes with an HDD.

The only mod I've used that severely taxed my PC was Custom Asteroids in 1.0.5; it may be fixed now though, and configuring it to use the stock spawn system reduces the load greatly according to the mod's developer.

 

  On 9/4/2016 at 10:12 PM, Diche Bach said:

Would you mind post a screen cap of your GameData directory with all the mod sub-directories visible?

Expand  

I would. I will however say that I've cut down a lot of my mods for particular things I want, which can go as far as using only one planet from an entire system overhaul mod, and I'm only using 14 parts from Bluedog's ~250 part mod.

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've gone back and forth on this. I have played extended times both with and without mods. When I did use mods, I used a LOT; I still have some older versions archived with 160+ mods on each (some even from when 64-bit was unofficial and actively boycotted). There are some amazing mods out there.

I do not use mods anymore, at all, and I feel no urge to load any. It is amazing how much more time I gain to actually just play and enjoy the game, when I no longer have a need to try keep up with mods (it loads a whole lot faster too!).

KSP is quite an awesome pass time without a single mod loaded. Some bugs and shortcomings can be annoying at times and can make me long for moar or better, but the game reels me in every time anyway. And despite wild claims to the contrary: everything in the game can be done successfully without mods. In fact, people routinely come up with things to do in the game that no mod provides for. The Sandbox is real - long live the pure stock experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...