Nergal8617 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 (edited) Testing now, will update when I'm done. Edit: So I'm seeing two problems, one there is insufficient cooling once the drills hit optimum temperature; two at optimum drill temperature you are producing insufficient power so you quickly run out and everything shuts down. Edited February 25, 2017 by Nergal8617 Expansion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamerscircle Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 4 minutes ago, WuphonsReach said: I'm pretty sure that it varies by the type of radiator. The fixed (unextendable) radiators are very location-sensitive and will only draw heat from "nearby" parts (whether that means the parent part + grandparent part, or is a range in meters, I'm not sure). The extendable radiators, OTOH, will cool parts anywhere on the vessel. I updated the craft so that only MKS thermals are being used, the location of the stock were extremely close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voicey99 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 Just now, WuphonsReach said: I'm pretty sure that it varies by the type of radiator. The fixed (unextendable) radiators are very location-sensitive and will only draw heat from "nearby" parts (whether that means the parent part + grandparent part, or is a range in meters, I'm not sure). The extendable radiators, OTOH, will cool parts anywhere on the vessel. Panels will only draw heat from the part it is attached to and any parts attached to that part regardless of distance (inc. offset parts). While the deployable radiators don't have that restriction and have a better total cooling rate, panels are also good in that they can cool parts 1/4 the temperature of their own (compared to 1/2 for the deployables) and have a much higher core heat transfer (I believe this is the max cooling that can be applied to a single part) per unit mass. For example, the small TCS applies three times the total cooling of the small panel to the whole vessel, but draws the same amount from each part as well as weighing five times as much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveBowman Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 All, I have been unable to 'Deploy' any modules, specifically the Expandables, for the last two releases. I am able to deploy them in the VAB, just not in the game. Could I be doing something wrong? Halp me! Please and thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voicey99 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 1 minute ago, DaveBowman said: All, I have been unable to 'Deploy' any modules, specifically the Expandables, for the last two releases. I am able to deploy them in the VAB, just not in the game. Could I be doing something wrong? Halp me! Please and thank you. Screenshot? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notthebobo Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 3 minutes ago, DaveBowman said: All, I have been unable to 'Deploy' any modules, specifically the Expandables, for the last two releases. I am able to deploy them in the VAB, just not in the game. Could I be doing something wrong? Halp me! Please and thank you. Just to verify, you are doing this with an EVA'd Kerbal and have sufficient MaterialKits? See the FAQ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoverDude Posted February 25, 2017 Author Share Posted February 25, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, Baladain said: If you fill up the organics on your converter, and then hit the lock button next to the resource, other functions will not be able to take away that resource, allowing you to keep organic production at 100% Same thing goes for machinery. Keep them locked, and then the usage drain will pull from storage instead of from your converters. Just make sure you have enough in storage to keep things going. That sounds like a bug 1 hour ago, Tarheel1999 said: The stock thermal panels efficiency depend on their location on your craft. They need to be attached to the part which needs cooling or its grandparent part. Did you notice in RD's stream last night that he was very particular about where he put the stock thermal panels? The problem could simply be the stock panels or their placement. For testing purposes, I would suggest removing the stock panels and placing 3 Ranger thermals on your miner and then test it on Kerbin. If this works move down to two Ranger thermals to see if this works. Finally you can go down back to one Ranger thermal and experiment with the location of your stock thermal panels. Doing this way will help you eliminate MKS as the culprit for your cooling problems. The other possibility here is that the EC and Cooling requirements for the drills are for EACH separator. I believe the 500 has 3. So that would actually be 120 ec per drill instead of 40 and 150kw cooling instead of 50kw. EC and Cooling are PER separator. That may be your issue 55 minutes ago, Terwin said: Reported issue: https://github.com/BobPalmer/MKS/issues/1174 Looks like the 2.5 and 3.75 converters are currently making Chemicals when set to Fertilizer(G). Looks like just a copy/paste error in the config. Really liking the idea of the automated parts and looking forward to getting them deployed so I can test them out. Not sure if it is worth sending out new base kits to Duna though, I'll probably try something faster to get to like Moho, not any bases there yet... I also like how the inflatable workshop seems like the go-to part for building out your first base component. I am hoping that the 300% workshop efficiency is not also a typo... Question: does the level of Kolonists have any impact on colony rewards? Anything else? Thanks, will take a look RE converters. And the 300% is not a typo, it's correct given that part's mass/volume. Kolony rewards are Kerbal count based not star based. 15 minutes ago, WuphonsReach said: I'm pretty sure that it varies by the type of radiator. The fixed (unextendable) radiators are very location-sensitive and will only draw heat from "nearby" parts (whether that means the parent part + grandparent part, or is a range in meters, I'm not sure). The extendable radiators, OTOH, will cool parts anywhere on the vessel. Fixed pull from parents and siblings, range is not part of this. Extendables are vessel wide. 8 minutes ago, DaveBowman said: All, I have been unable to 'Deploy' any modules, specifically the Expandables, for the last two releases. I am able to deploy them in the VAB, just not in the game. Could I be doing something wrong? Halp me! Please and thank you. You need to have sufficient Material Kits, and perform the deploy action on EVA Edited February 25, 2017 by RoverDude Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voicey99 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 Derp, I thought he meant radiators. You also need power to deploy modules. It will tell you how much you need to deploy them in the VAB (under USIAnimation). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarheel1999 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 @gamerscircle I tested your craft. You were running out of power. I added another reactor and it worked fine. Note Rover's comment above that EC and core heat are per separator. So you will need to have sufficient cooling and power for 12 drills (4 physical drills x 3 separators). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voicey99 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 The figures being per drillhead confused me as well at first, this is something that could be better explained ingame (e.g. in the part desc). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilph Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 40 minutes ago, gamerscircle said: Picture please? Here is the 2.5 nuke on a big refinery. Only have 3 of 6 radiators on and never needed more Here is a 1.25 off the side of an AM. I do the same on my orbital stations. Usually dont need more than two radiators Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamerscircle Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 4 minutes ago, Tarheel1999 said: @gamerscircle I tested your craft. You were running out of power. I added another reactor and it worked fine. Note Rover's comment above that EC and core heat are per separator. So you will need to have sufficient cooling and power for 12 drills (4 physical drills x 3 separators). Oh oh.. so.. since each drill has "3 / three" configurable resource separators , then the ec cost isn't per drill, it is per resource separator? That is confusing when you read it in the editor. Well, okay, so does that still apply to the video that I posted where one drill [w/three separators] and 3 thermals was too much power? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voicey99 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 @RoverDude Mind if I PR in some slightly extended drill descriptions to address this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoverDude Posted February 25, 2017 Author Share Posted February 25, 2017 @voicey99 - go for it And now is a good time as I am gathering some stuff for a patch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarheel1999 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 11 minutes ago, gamerscircle said: Oh oh.. so.. since each drill has "3 / three" configurable resource separators , then the ec cost isn't per drill, it is per resource separator? That is confusing when you read it in the editor. Well, okay, so does that still apply to the video that I posted where one drill [w/three separators] and 3 thermals was too much power? I had 2 drills with one nuke and 4 drills with 2 nukes working on kerbin. Maybe cooling is different on Kerbin and the Mun. Regardless, do the maths again and design for the power/cooling requirements for 4 drills with 3 separators. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voicey99 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 Just took a look at the new MPUs, and I've noticed that they have LF and OX modes but not an LFO mode, and that LF and OX are produced in equal quantities despite *always* being used in a 9:11 ratio. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sh1pman Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 Just now, voicey99 said: Just took a look at the new MPUs, and I've noticed that they have LF and OX modes but not an LFO mode, and that LF and OX are produced in equal quantities despite *always* being used in a 9:11 ratio. Did you see RD's last stream? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voicey99 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 Just now, sh1pman said: Did you see RD's last stream? Did he say something relevant or something? Not all of us are in the same timezone (or watch the vods). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoverDude Posted February 25, 2017 Author Share Posted February 25, 2017 TBH I will probably swap out Ox mode for LFO for the next patch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarheel1999 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 2 minutes ago, RoverDude said: TBH I will probably swap out Ox mode for LFO for the next patch Cool beans Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voicey99 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 Created #1176 for the extended descriptions. Also threw in a couple of commits to remove the vesseltype = Base tag from the Kerbitats, since they are used just as widely on stations and ships as they are in bases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baladain Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 1 hour ago, RoverDude said: That sounds like a bug If it is, please don't fix it. It's not game breaking, since your converters still consume the resources, they just consume it from storage instead of from the supply on the converter itself. This also has the added benefit of being able to lock machinery at a specific level on each converter, thus allowing it to function as a governor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilph Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 Hi, just to verify, the new drills and MPUs no longer need a Logistics module to push to PL? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voicey99 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Gilph said: Hi, just to verify, the new drills and MPUs no longer need a Logistics module to push to PL? They haven't since 0.50.9. They can't pull, though. Edited February 25, 2017 by voicey99 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilph Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 2 minutes ago, voicey99 said: They haven't since 0.50.9. They can't pull, though. I thought 0.50.9 removed the pilot requirement, but you still needed the module Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.