Mission Idea: Emulating Real Life in Kerbal Space Program [WIP] [Submit a Payload] [Become a Launch or Payload Provider]

[Skylon]

Just now, icantmakemodels said:

With tweakscale or procedural parts?

Tweakscale

Or both if procedural parts are allowed

Edited June 4, 2017 by Skylon

[icantmakemodels]

@TheEpicSquared, add Procedural parts to the modlist? Not sure if it works for 1.1.2 or 1.3, but if it does, add it.

[StupidAndy]

and the winner of the <RETRACTED> contract is

while the extra orbit stuff would be nice, the winner is...

@Skylon, for making it 3,000 funds cheaper, you will be notified of the orbits soon!

[Oliverm001x]

20 hours ago, Skylon said:

Or a 1.875m core

That is correct

20 hours ago, icantmakemodels said:

Let me make sure I have this straight: Phase two allows 1.25m cores with 0.625m SRBs radially attached, with a maximum total height of 25m.

Phase two enables the construction of 1.875 meter core rockets with the height of 30 meters (still under discussion), with the potential of up to 6 radial SRBs. Sounds positive! Can't wait for the imaginative ideas to flow in.  

[icantmakemodels]

So where do I find 1.875m fuel tanks?

[Uace24]

If anyone on this forum page would like to participate in a Mission Controll emulator for Real Life missions shoot me a PM or post on this fourm page

forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/158759-international-space-exploration-agency-next-launch-june-24t-launch-controller-positions-open/ 

Edited June 5, 2017 by Uace24

[tsgaerospace]

38 minutes ago, icantmakemodels said:

So where do I find 1.875m fuel tanks?

Tweakscale or procedural tanks

 

[Skylon]

54 minutes ago, icantmakemodels said:

So where do I find 1.875m fuel tanks?

You either use tweakscale or use 1.25m with radial SRBs (I'm assuming 1.875m with SRBs is disallowed for now, correct @Oliverm001x?)

Or wait for 2.5m

Edited June 5, 2017 by Skylon

[tsgaerospace]

15 minutes ago, Skylon said:

You either use tweakscale or use 1.25m with radial SRBs (I'm assuming 1.875m with SRBs is disallowed for now, correct @Oliverm001x?)

Or wait for 2.5m

so i guess my srbclfob is disalowed

srb core, lfo on the sides

example

 

[53miner53]

@Skylon @StupidAndy, Copper 1.1 has a 2000 price increase on full reusability due to attempting to make it more capable and structurally sound. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

Edited June 5, 2017 by 53miner53

[StupidAndy]

56 minutes ago, 53miner53 said:

@Skylon, @StupidAndy, Copper 1.1 has a 2000 price increase on full reusability due to attempting to make it more capable and structurally sound. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

so 18000?

[53miner53]

Just now, StupidAndy said:

so 18000?

Yes.

[StupidAndy]

7 minutes ago, 53miner53 said:

Yes.

ah that's not that bad

also another question:

if a person is a LP and a PP, does the PP budget affect their LP budget, so if someone launches a payload on another rocket, does the LP lose funds?

 

Edited June 5, 2017 by StupidAndy

[tsgaerospace]

8 hours ago, StupidAndy said:

ah that's not that bad

also another question:

if a person is a LP and a PP, does the PP budget affect their LP budget, so if someone launches a payload on another rocket, does the LP lose funds?

 

PPs don't have funds if I'm not mistaken

[StupidAndy]

8 hours ago, tsgaerospace said:

PPs don't have funds if I'm not mistaken

yes, i know, but if a LP launches a payload on another rocket do they lose funds from paying the LP

[icantmakemodels]

 

4 hours ago, StupidAndy said:

yes, i know, but if a LP launches a payload on another rocket do they lose funds from paying the LP

I would assume so.

 

@TheEpicSquared, He1+Xsat1 Launched yet?

EDIT: Also, for satellites matching /Xsat[123]/, make sure they're 120 degrees from each other.

Edited June 6, 2017 by icantmakemodels

[Skylon]

Can you add this to the launch manifest and the launches previously requested? When you get to a computer. Maybe just link the requests just to remind you in the launch manifest

[Oliverm001x]

On 2017-6-5 at 5:31 PM, Skylon said:

You either use tweakscale or use 1.25m with radial SRBs (I'm assuming 1.875m with SRBs is disallowed for now, correct @Oliverm001x?)

Or wait for 2.5m

We use tweakscale which is in the mod list for reference page at the front, with SRBs allowed!

[StupidAndy]

so now that its summer-ish and coming for everyone in school probably

will this be going a bit faster? its a bit annoying where we have massive amounts of activity in one day and for the next few its nothing

you are FORCED to play Kerbal! no exceptions!

oh and a question...since we are about to roll out Mk2s, can I jump in the LP business and make a Mk2?

Edited June 10, 2017 by StupidAndy

[tsgaerospace]

an idea for a new rule:

when a launch failiure occures, a launch escape should be in place and be activated, if not present you face a penalty for putting your kerbals in danger, if they die by a faulty launch escape system you get a bit bigger penalty and if they die by the lack of a launch escape system you get an even bigger penalty 

or something like that

[Skylon]

12 minutes ago, tsgaerospace said:

an idea for a new rule:

when a launch failiure occures, a launch escape should be in place and be activated, if not present you face a penalty for putting your kerbals in danger, if they die by a faulty launch escape system you get a bit bigger penalty and if they die by the lack of a launch escape system you get an even bigger penalty 

or something like that

I believe all capsules require redundant launch escape systems already. Good idea though!

[tsgaerospace]

9 minutes ago, Skylon said:

I believe all capsules require redundant launch escape systems already. Good idea though!

it is not specified in the OP

but still i´m adding a les to my capsule

[StupidAndy]

how about if you kill a Kerbal, its a penalty

but if you kill a Kerbal TOURIST its a bigger penalty

[tsgaerospace]

3 hours ago, StupidAndy said:

how about if you kill a Kerbal, its a penalty

but if you kill a Kerbal TOURIST its a bigger penalty

What about if it's a tourist the penalty gets upgraded by one degree and if you kill a tourist by the lack of a les you get an even bigger penalty

The penalty is per each kerbal

Edited June 13, 2017 by tsgaerospace

[StupidAndy]

9 hours ago, tsgaerospace said:

What about if it's a tourist the penalty gets upgraded by one degree and if you kill a tourist by the lack of a les you get an even bigger penalty

The penalty is per each kerbal

yeah! that's a good idea

but why would you not have a LES anyways?