Mission Idea: Emulating Real Life in Kerbal Space Program [WIP] [Submit a Payload] [Become a Launch or Payload Provider]

[Skylon]

  On 6/4/2017 at 3:29 PM, icantmakemodels said:

With tweakscale or procedural parts?

Expand  

Tweakscale

Or both if procedural parts are allowed

Edited June 4, 2017 by Skylon

[icantmakemodels]

@TheEpicSquared, add Procedural parts to the modlist? Not sure if it works for 1.1.2 or 1.3, but if it does, add it.

[StupidAndy]

and the winner of the <RETRACTED> contract is

while the extra orbit stuff would be nice, the winner is...

@Skylon, for making it 3,000 funds cheaper, you will be notified of the orbits soon!

[Oliverm001x]

  On 6/4/2017 at 3:28 PM, Skylon said:

Or a 1.875m core

Expand  

That is correct

  On 6/4/2017 at 3:23 PM, icantmakemodels said:

Let me make sure I have this straight: Phase two allows 1.25m cores with 0.625m SRBs radially attached, with a maximum total height of 25m.

Expand  

Phase two enables the construction of 1.875 meter core rockets with the height of 30 meters (still under discussion), with the potential of up to 6 radial SRBs. Sounds positive! Can't wait for the imaginative ideas to flow in.  

[icantmakemodels]

So where do I find 1.875m fuel tanks?

[Uace24]

If anyone on this forum page would like to participate in a Mission Controll emulator for Real Life missions shoot me a PM or post on this fourm page

forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/158759-international-space-exploration-agency-next-launch-june-24t-launch-controller-positions-open/ 

Edited June 5, 2017 by Uace24

[tsgaerospace]

  On 6/5/2017 at 2:37 PM, icantmakemodels said:

So where do I find 1.875m fuel tanks?

Expand  

Tweakscale or procedural tanks

 

[Skylon]

  On 6/5/2017 at 2:37 PM, icantmakemodels said:

So where do I find 1.875m fuel tanks?

Expand  

You either use tweakscale or use 1.25m with radial SRBs (I'm assuming 1.875m with SRBs is disallowed for now, correct @Oliverm001x?)

Or wait for 2.5m

Edited June 5, 2017 by Skylon

[tsgaerospace]

  On 6/5/2017 at 3:31 PM, Skylon said:

You either use tweakscale or use 1.25m with radial SRBs (I'm assuming 1.875m with SRBs is disallowed for now, correct @Oliverm001x?)

Or wait for 2.5m

Expand  

so i guess my srbclfob is disalowed

srb core, lfo on the sides

example

 

[53miner53]

@Skylon @StupidAndy, Copper 1.1 has a 2000 price increase on full reusability due to attempting to make it more capable and structurally sound. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

Edited June 5, 2017 by 53miner53

[StupidAndy]

  On 6/5/2017 at 7:16 PM, 53miner53 said:

@Skylon, @StupidAndy, Copper 1.1 has a 2000 price increase on full reusability due to attempting to make it more capable and structurally sound. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

Expand  

so 18000?

[53miner53]

  On 6/5/2017 at 8:14 PM, StupidAndy said:

so 18000?

Expand  

Yes.

[StupidAndy]

  On 6/5/2017 at 8:15 PM, 53miner53 said:

Yes.

Expand  

ah that's not that bad

also another question:

if a person is a LP and a PP, does the PP budget affect their LP budget, so if someone launches a payload on another rocket, does the LP lose funds?

 

Edited June 5, 2017 by StupidAndy

[tsgaerospace]

  On 6/5/2017 at 8:22 PM, StupidAndy said:

ah that's not that bad

also another question:

if a person is a LP and a PP, does the PP budget affect their LP budget, so if someone launches a payload on another rocket, does the LP lose funds?

 

Expand  

PPs don't have funds if I'm not mistaken

[StupidAndy]

  On 6/6/2017 at 5:07 AM, tsgaerospace said:

PPs don't have funds if I'm not mistaken

Expand  

yes, i know, but if a LP launches a payload on another rocket do they lose funds from paying the LP

[icantmakemodels]

 

  On 6/6/2017 at 1:29 PM, StupidAndy said:

yes, i know, but if a LP launches a payload on another rocket do they lose funds from paying the LP

Expand  

I would assume so.

 

@TheEpicSquared, He1+Xsat1 Launched yet?

EDIT: Also, for satellites matching /Xsat[123]/, make sure they're 120 degrees from each other.

Edited June 6, 2017 by icantmakemodels

[Skylon]

Can you add this to the launch manifest and the launches previously requested? When you get to a computer. Maybe just link the requests just to remind you in the launch manifest

[Oliverm001x]

  On 6/5/2017 at 3:31 PM, Skylon said:

You either use tweakscale or use 1.25m with radial SRBs (I'm assuming 1.875m with SRBs is disallowed for now, correct @Oliverm001x?)

Or wait for 2.5m

Expand  

We use tweakscale which is in the mod list for reference page at the front, with SRBs allowed!

[StupidAndy]

so now that its summer-ish and coming for everyone in school probably

will this be going a bit faster? its a bit annoying where we have massive amounts of activity in one day and for the next few its nothing

you are FORCED to play Kerbal! no exceptions!

oh and a question...since we are about to roll out Mk2s, can I jump in the LP business and make a Mk2?

Edited June 10, 2017 by StupidAndy

[tsgaerospace]

an idea for a new rule:

when a launch failiure occures, a launch escape should be in place and be activated, if not present you face a penalty for putting your kerbals in danger, if they die by a faulty launch escape system you get a bit bigger penalty and if they die by the lack of a launch escape system you get an even bigger penalty 

or something like that

[Skylon]

  On 6/12/2017 at 7:04 PM, tsgaerospace said:

an idea for a new rule:

when a launch failiure occures, a launch escape should be in place and be activated, if not present you face a penalty for putting your kerbals in danger, if they die by a faulty launch escape system you get a bit bigger penalty and if they die by the lack of a launch escape system you get an even bigger penalty 

or something like that

Expand  

I believe all capsules require redundant launch escape systems already. Good idea though!

[tsgaerospace]

  On 6/12/2017 at 7:17 PM, Skylon said:

I believe all capsules require redundant launch escape systems already. Good idea though!

Expand  

it is not specified in the OP

but still i´m adding a les to my capsule

[StupidAndy]

how about if you kill a Kerbal, its a penalty

but if you kill a Kerbal TOURIST its a bigger penalty

[tsgaerospace]

  On 6/13/2017 at 1:50 AM, StupidAndy said:

how about if you kill a Kerbal, its a penalty

but if you kill a Kerbal TOURIST its a bigger penalty

Expand  

What about if it's a tourist the penalty gets upgraded by one degree and if you kill a tourist by the lack of a les you get an even bigger penalty

The penalty is per each kerbal

Edited June 13, 2017 by tsgaerospace

[StupidAndy]

  On 6/13/2017 at 5:48 AM, tsgaerospace said:

What about if it's a tourist the penalty gets upgraded by one degree and if you kill a tourist by the lack of a les you get an even bigger penalty

The penalty is per each kerbal

Expand  

yeah! that's a good idea

but why would you not have a LES anyways?