Jump to content

SpaceX Discussion Thread


Skylon

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, CatastrophicFailure said:

...3:45 shalt be the number thou shalt launch at, and the number thou shalt launch at shall be 3:45. 
3:46 shalt thou not count, nor either count thou 3:44, excepting that thou then proceed to 3:45. 
3:46 is right out, as are scrubs, delays, unnecessary explosions, or other such nonsense.  

Amen.

LIKE LIKE LIKE LIKE LIKE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@qzgy:


"

Lightning and wind are the primary weather concerns that preclude rocket launch.

A rocket's control system needs to compensate for lots of un-modeled or difficult to model factors. For example, uncertainty in mass properties, engine performance, mechanical alignments, errors in inertial measurement units (IMU), gyroscopes, GPS, etc. If any of these errors become too large the system will not longer be able to compensate, the system will become uncontrollable, and the mission will be lost.

Wind, unsurprisingly, is one of these uncertain factors, and especially wind shears, which are rapid changes in wind direction as a function of location, are difficult for control systems to handle because they can put enormous aerodynamic loads on a vehicle very quickly.

Lightning is dangerous for entirely different reasons. Rockets are full of sensitive electronics, attract lightning nicely (even when not grounded), and are vulnerable to direct lightning strike. Even something as typically benign as a reset or temporarily glitch that could potentially be tolerated in a satellite would be disastrous to a rocket under powered flight. Airplanes avoid lightning storms for the same reason, although they have more margin available to incorporate lightning mitigation into their designs.

For these reasons (and to a lesser extent others, such as the extreme temperature example provided in another answer), rockets launches are frequently delayed for ideal conditions. There's no sense in risking a rocket and payload worth hundreds of millions of dollars for a week.

In contrast, rockets that must be able to be launched in at a moments notice (think ICBMs and SLBMs) are designed with very different requirements. Here, the performance hit taken to design robustness to weather is accepted because a weapon isn't very useful if you have to wait for the storm to pass before it can be fired. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, qzgy said:

Mind if I ask, but what fails if we have these high upper level winds? Is it a structural thing or is it something with guidance/control?

It's structural. Differential wind shear can rip a high-fineness rocket apart.

Two minutes to fueling poll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ArkaelDren said:

Imagine wind shear of 2-300ft.  Now imagine a massive test rocket at MaxQ travelling through it.  You think air is soft and fluffy???  :0.0:

About as soft and fluffy as an avalanche hitting you in the face :D. And avalanche is much slower LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rats, there's just enough cloud cover we're not going to be able to see anything outside... But I heard this morning on the news we might get a sonic boom or two... not sure if we'll hear it all the way over here, but who knows...

 

Edited by Just Jim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...