Nuke Posted Saturday at 04:41 AM Share Posted Saturday at 04:41 AM kicking the tires and lighting the fires again, already. i guess the bureaucrats really want to keep their jobs before they get doged out of existence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exoscientist Posted Saturday at 01:28 PM Share Posted Saturday at 01:28 PM (edited) The conclusion you could get a Saturn V-class launcher, i.e., 100+ ton payload to LEO, using the Starship as a 1st stage and a “mini-Starship” as an upper stage is based on this estimate Elon once made for an expendable Starship dry mass. But that is for an upper stage use where it did not have enough engines for liftoff from ground. Assume for 1st stage use it needs 9 engines. Increase the dry mass now to 50 tons for the greater engine mass. For the mini-Starship, an upper stage commonly is 1/3rd to 1/4th the size of the lower stage, so call it 420 tons propellant mass. As an upper stage it doesn’t need high engine thrust so assume same mass ratio of ~30 to 1 as for Elon’s expendable Starship estimate, giving it a dry mass of 14 tons. Take Starship exhaust velocity as ground launched as comparable to that of the Superheavy, 3,500 m/s. And take the upper stage’s vacuum exhaust velocity as 3,800 m/s. Then we could get ~120 tons to LEO: 3,500Ln(1 + 1,200/(50 + 434 + 120)) + 3,800Ln(1 + 420/(14 + 120)) = 9,200 m/s. In that last post I cited Zubrin’s comment that Elon’s says the Starship production cost could be brought down to ~$10 million. But that undoubtedly is for high production rates. But the current production cost for Superheavy/Starship is estimated to be ~$90 million, with about 30%, $27 million, for Starship: STARSHIP COST ANALYSIS OVERVIEW Note: This is Payload's current estimate and not based on access to any internal Space data or proprietary information. Current Estimated Starship & Booster Full Stack Cost (S in thousands) 39 Raptor Engines 39,000 Labor. 35,000 Structure, plumbing, tiles, parts 13,000 Avionics 3.000 Total 90,000 *Payload costs estimates are based on a post-R&D 1-2 year forward-looking model. This is an educated best estimate and not based on Space internal data. Further cost reductions are expected in the long-run. $90M cost: Payload estimates it costs $90M to manufacture a fully integrated Starship based on a post-R&D/test production phase near-term model. The go-forward cost does not factor in the near $5B SpaceX has spent on R&D to date. ~70% of costs accrue to Super Heavy and ~30% to Starship upper stage. Future Starship (upper stage) cost reductions: As Starfactory comes online and Raptor production is refined, Space aims to reduce costs even further. A focus on Starship's upper stage: When SpaceX achieves full reusability, production of Starship second stage vehicles will be an order of magnitude higher than booster production. • The company plans to eventually build multiple second stage Starships per week and reduce Raptor engine's production cost to $250K a pop. If successful, the long-term cost to mass produce second-stage Starships could drop to $10M to $15M a vehicle. However, for purposes of this report, we will analyze costs as they are today. Raptor 2 engines ($39M) Payload estimates each Raptor 2 engine costs ~$1M to build. The 39 engines-which include three additional upper-stage engines that will be added in the future-are by far the biggest Starship cost, adding $39M to total cost. SIM per Raptor 2 engine is half as expensive as its $2M+ Raptor 1 predecessor. 20 SpaceX hopes to eventually bring the cost per engine down to ~$250K. Payload Research 18. Elon Musk on X 19. Space 20.Elon Musk on X 21. Elon Musk on X https://docsend.com/view/fi9wuazzeex57iig Say, for a mini-Starship upper stage its cost would be a 3rd of the $27 million production cost of the Starship, so $9 million. So the full vehicle production cost at $36 million. So a Saturn V-class launcher capable of 100+ tons to LEO at ca. $36 million. Note also SpaceX demonstrated with the Falcon 9 landing just the first stage, i.e., partial reusability, much easier than full reusability. Then this Starship now as first stage could be reused cutting its cost to, say, $2.7 million per launch, for the total partial reuse cost of $11.7 million per launch. This is a Saturn V-class vehicle capable of single launch Mars or Moon missions we could launch now. No thermal tile problems, or needing to master orbital refueling, or stretching tanks, or increasing Raptor thrust. We have this capability now. Bob Clark Edited Saturday at 09:29 PM by Exoscientist Clarity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthgently Posted Saturday at 03:42 PM Share Posted Saturday at 03:42 PM Noice pic! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RCgothic Posted Saturday at 04:31 PM Share Posted Saturday at 04:31 PM (edited) On 11/16/2024 at 1:28 PM, Exoscientist said: This is a Saturn V-class vehicle capable of single launch Mars or Moon missions we could launch now. No thermal tile problems, or needing to master orbital refueling, or stretching tanks, or increasing Raptor thrust. We have this capability now. Cool, if all SpaceX wanted to do is send a flag and footprints mission to the moon or *maybe* Mars. And that might be a sensible way forward (for the getting Orion to the moon portion of Artemis before Starship gets rated for lunar returns) if SLS gets cancelled. But that is *not* what SpaceX wants to do. SpaceX wants a permanent base on the moon. They want a city on Mars. They want the ability to brake hundreds of tonnes of mass into orbit of the outer planets arriving off a fast trajectory. And they want all that to be affordable on their own budget. Starship Superheavy expendable can accomplish some useful missions soon in the short term for a reasonable price. But frankly SpaceX would find that to be a distraction from what they actually want to do. If, as a nation, the US has different priorities, then I'm sure SpaceX wouldn't say no to a big cheque. But humanity would advance faster by investing in the long term goals SpaceX are pursuing rather than distracting them with short term dead-end avenues like flag and footprints (again). Edited Tuesday at 07:48 AM by RCgothic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthgently Posted Saturday at 05:11 PM Share Posted Saturday at 05:11 PM Nice endorsement if accurate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthgently Posted Saturday at 05:32 PM Share Posted Saturday at 05:32 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted Saturday at 08:10 PM Share Posted Saturday at 08:10 PM 4 hours ago, darthgently said: Noice pic! Tuesday? Poo. I will have to watch the replay. Maybe - just maybe - I can run it during class. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuke Posted Saturday at 11:20 PM Share Posted Saturday at 11:20 PM tuesday is shopping day, but im broke so... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted Sunday at 12:44 AM Share Posted Sunday at 12:44 AM I'll be back east, but beats Monday when I'll be on a plane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultimate Steve Posted Sunday at 02:48 AM Share Posted Sunday at 02:48 AM I guess being unemployed and not in education has its benefits. Watch party it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superpluto126 Posted Sunday at 05:01 AM Share Posted Sunday at 05:01 AM Luckily I'll be out of School, see y'all at the livestream! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthgently Posted Sunday at 06:15 AM Share Posted Sunday at 06:15 AM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikegarrison Posted Sunday at 06:43 AM Share Posted Sunday at 06:43 AM On 11/15/2024 at 8:41 PM, Nuke said: kicking the tires and lighting the fires again, already. i guess the bureaucrats really want to keep their jobs before they get doged out of existence. It almost sounds like you think it is a good thing if billionaires buy access to the government in order to intimidate the people regulating their companies from doing the job that the people of the country hired them to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuke Posted Sunday at 07:15 AM Share Posted Sunday at 07:15 AM 28 minutes ago, mikegarrison said: It almost sounds like you think it is a good thing if billionaires buy access to the government in order to intimidate the people regulating their companies from doing the job that the people of the country hired them to do. where have you been? this has been the norm as far back as i can remember. bureaucrats are the second most wasteful thing in government right behind war, and im not sure i got the order right. that said no administration that has existed since ive been alive has made one step towards solving the problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deddly Posted Sunday at 08:20 AM Share Posted Sunday at 08:20 AM I think I smell politics. Yes. I smell politics. Let's not, please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultimate Steve Posted Sunday at 02:35 PM Share Posted Sunday at 02:35 PM Crew-10 in February is using a brand new Dragon, likely the last one they will build unless Starship encounters insurmountable problems, so we will get a new spacecraft name in a few months. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted Sunday at 03:31 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:31 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthgently Posted Sunday at 04:11 PM Share Posted Sunday at 04:11 PM 38 minutes ago, tater said: If it isn’t obvious this vid is a comparison between the simulation (left) and the reality (right). What I want to know is whether that is a pre-flight predictive sim, or after the deed. If the former, even more impressive Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuessingEveryDay Posted Sunday at 05:31 PM Share Posted Sunday at 05:31 PM 1 hour ago, darthgently said: If it isn’t obvious this vid is a comparison between the simulation (left) and the reality (right). What I want to know is whether that is a pre-flight predictive sim, or after the deed. If the former, even more impressive I couldn't find the video itself from SpaceX, but I did find a channel reposting it, back in April. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted Sunday at 05:53 PM Share Posted Sunday at 05:53 PM 20 minutes ago, GuessingEveryDay said: I couldn't find the video itself from SpaceX, but I did find a channel reposting it, back in April. Yeah, it's a sim that predates the flight. They are substantially less seat of the pants than their critics claim. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuke Posted Sunday at 05:55 PM Share Posted Sunday at 05:55 PM (edited) 9 hours ago, Deddly said: I think I smell politics. Yes. I smell politics. Let's not, please. its getting there, i had to be very careful how much detail i used, but then again i realized that since its such a universal apathy (or perhaps willful intent) that it was apolitical. if everyone is doing it, then its simply human behavior. Edited Sunday at 05:57 PM by Nuke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuessingEveryDay Posted Sunday at 05:58 PM Share Posted Sunday at 05:58 PM 26 minutes ago, GuessingEveryDay said: I couldn't find the video itself from SpaceX, but I did find a channel reposting it, back in April. Alright, April 6th! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuke Posted Sunday at 06:00 PM Share Posted Sunday at 06:00 PM thing i worry about here is that spacex lets this fast tracking go to its head and starts making mistakes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted Sunday at 07:32 PM Share Posted Sunday at 07:32 PM 1 hour ago, Nuke said: thing i worry about here is that spacex lets this fast tracking go to its head and starts making mistakes. They've been working this for a long time, look at the hardware ahead of launches (eqp rich). There will be problems, but they'll get data and sort them. Second pad is very near completion—if they wreck the current pad, they can't fly until they finish the new pad... if they wait for the backup before flying, they can't fly until they finish the new pad. Seems like no difference to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthgently Posted Sunday at 07:38 PM Share Posted Sunday at 07:38 PM I’ve been subject to intrusive imaginings of a duel Superheavy launch and landing utilizing both towers at once. I can’t think of a valid use case but it would be so dang spectacular Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.